Case law

Oakey v. US Airways Pilots Disability Income Plan

723 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 2013

Judicial review of the board of adjustment’s decision is limited to three categories expressly set out in the RLA. Id. (citing Union Pac. R.R. v. … Cir. 1989) (emphasis in brief)) and (2) “the interpretative issue must be dispositive or conclusive” of the claim, id. at 23 (citing Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 254 F.3d 654, 668 (7th Cir. 2001) (emphasis in brief)).

EF International Language Schools, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

673 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 2017

Bay Hosps. v. NLRB, 687 F.3d 424, 437 (D.C. Cir. 2012); Titanium Metals Corp. v. NLRB, 392 F.3d 439, 446 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … We review the decision of the Board, not that of the ALJ. See Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. NLRB, 652 F.3d 22, 25-26 (D.C.

Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Federal Reserve Board, Bank America Corporation, Intervenor

509 F.2d 363 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1975

Org. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150, 152 , 90 S.Ct. 827, 829 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970). 8 . Id. at 153 , 90 S.Ct. at 830 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 . 9 . Sierra Club v. … Org. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); National Ass’n of Securities Dealers, Inc. v.

Jackson v. Spencer

313 F. Supp. 3d 302 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2018

See, e.g., Fisher v. Peters, 249 F.3d 433 , 438 (6th Cir. 2001) ; Brown v. United States, 227 F.3d 295 , 298 (5th Cir. 2000) ; Hodge v. Dalton , 107 F.3d 705 , 707-12 (9th Cir. 1997) ; Randall v. … Kendall v. Army Bd. for Corr. of Military Records , 996 F.2d 362 , 365 (D.C. Cir. 1993). Thus, a challenge to military board of corrections decision must be filed within six years of an adverse review board decision.

Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

293 F.2d 153 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 1961

Great Lakes Airlines v. C. A. B., supra at note 1 . … We find no abuse of the Board’s discretion. The order of the Board is Affirmed. 1 . Great Lakes Airlines v. C. A. B., 111 U.S.App.D.C.-, 294 F.2d 217 ; United Air Lines v. C. A. B., 1960, 108 U.S.

Connecticut Bankers Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

627 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1980

See Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 314 n.2, 551 F.2d 1270 , 1273 n.2 (1977); Independent Bankers Ass’n of Georgia v. … Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 591 F.2d 334, 335 (5th Cir. 1979); Citicorp v.

Truck Drivers & Helpers Local No. 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

364 F.2d 682 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1966

Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. … Co. v. NLRB, 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965); Wellington Mill Division, West Point Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 579 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 882 , 85 S.Ct. 144 , 13 L.Ed.2d 88 (1964) ; NLRB v.

George J. Reed, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole v. Lloyd D. Butterworth

297 F.2d 776 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1961

And in Fleming v. … See also Robbins v. Reed, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 51 at 52 , 269 F.2d 242 at 243 (1959). 2 It may be, as the Government says, that the Board lacks subpoena power.

Aircoach Transport Association, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

255 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1958

See Eccles v. Peoples Bank, 1948, 333 U.S. 426 , 68 S.Ct. 641 , 92 L.Ed. 784 ; Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States, 1939, 307 U.S. 125, 130 , 59 S.Ct. 754 , 83 L.Ed. 1147 . … See California Oregon Power Co. v. F.P.C., 1956, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 263, 270 , 239 F.2d 426, 433 .

Henry C. Field, Jr. v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense Henry C. Field, Jr. v. Harold Brown Joseph E. Hoker v. Harold Brown. James G. Little v. W. Graham Claytor, Jr.

610 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 2, 1980

FIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. Harold BROWN, Secretary of Defense, et al. Henry C. FIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. Harold BROWN et al. Joseph E. HOKER et al., Appellants, v. Harold BROWN. James G. LITTLE, Appellant, v. W. … Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. at 71 , 81 S.Ct. at 1397 .

Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

255 F. App'x 535 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 2007

The petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board was considered on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. … Conair Corp. v. NLRB, 721 F.2d 1355, 1368 (D.C.Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Communist Party of the United States of America v. Subversive Activities Control Board

223 F.2d 531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1955

Board of Education 42 and Wieman v. … United States, 1913, 227 U.S. 131, 143-144 , 33 S.Ct. 226 , 57 L.Ed. 450 ; Brown v. Walker, 1896, 161 U.S. 591, 600 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 ; United States v.

Montship Lines, Limited v. Federal Maritime Board and the United States of America

295 F.2d 147 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1961

On October 31,1960, the Second Circuit upheld the Board’s order and denied Kerr’s petition. Kerr S. S. Co. v. United States, 284 F.2d 61 . … But we agree with petitioners that the Board’s consideration of these motions on their merits constituted a waiver of the Board’s own limitation period. Cf. Bowman v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

363 F.2d 702 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1966

V. The Board ordered the Company to reinstate four employees it found to have been discharged to discourage union membership. The Company disputes the findings as to each. … See Local 152 v. NLRB, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 25, 27 , 343 F.2d 307 , 309 (1965); NLRB v. Delight Bakery, Inc., 353 F.2d 344, 347 (6th Cir. 1965).

Local 808, Building Maintenance, Service & Railroad Workers v. National Mediation Board

888 F.2d 1428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1989

R.R. v. … Ry. v.

Simon Boorda v. Subversive Activities Control Board, Robert Archuleta and Wayne Dallas Holley v. Subversive Activities Control Board

421 F.2d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1970

421 F.2d 1142 Simon BOORDA, Petitioner, v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. Robert ARCHULETA and Wayne Dallas Holley, Petitioners, v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. No. 22514. … See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 606-607 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 488 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960).

North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

237 F.2d 209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 1956

237 F.2d 209 NORTH AMERICAN AIRLINES, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. … Continental Southern Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 358 , 197 F.2d 397, 403

International Organization Of Masters, Mates And Pilots v. National Labor Relations Board

486 F.2d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 1973

ILA-AFL-CIO, Petitioners v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Marine & Marketing International Corporation, Intervenor No. 72-1595. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. … Labor Board, 357 U.S. 93, 99-100 , 78 S.Ct. 1011, 1016 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1958); see National Woodworkers Mfrs. Ass'n. v. NLRB, supra, 386 U.S., at 619 , 87 S.Ct. 1250 6 See NLRB v. Allis Chalmers Mfg.

Go Leasing, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board, Engen (Donald D.)

839 F.2d 824 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 1988

839 F.2d 824 268 U.S.App.D.C. 145 Go Leasing, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board, Engen (Donald D.) NO. 87-1284 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Bentonite Performance Minerals, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

456 F. App'x 2 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 2012

Mail Contractors of America v. NLRB, 514 F.3d 27, 31 (D.C.Cir. 2008). We find the Board’s order to be supported by substantial evidence and affirm the order in its entirety. … 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); see Highlands Hospital v.