Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscadc

10,000+ results

0.63s

  • Stanley Siegel v. Juanita M. Kreps, Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce

    654 F.2d 773 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1981

    Appellant relies on such decisions as Coles v. Penny, 174 U.S.App.D.C. 277 , 531 F.2d 609 (D.C.Cir.1976); Bell v. Brown, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 557 F.2d 849 (1977); and Laffey v. … Brown v. General Services Administration, supra; Bunch v. United States, 548 F.2d 336, 340 (9th Cir. 1977); Meisch v. U. S.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals

    127 F.3d 72 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 1997

    See Brown v. … Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980); Mustfov v. Superintendent of Chicago Police Dep’t, 733 F.Supp. 283, 292 (N.D.Ill.1990); Maynard v.

    Cited 266 timesPublished
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

    35 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 2002

    This cause was heard on the record from the National Labor Relations Board (Board) and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. … Country Ford Trucks, Inc. v. NLRB, 229 F.3d 1184, 1189 (D.C.Cir.2000). The Board’s determination in this case is not arbitrary and is supported by the evi *5 dence.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Southland Manufacturing Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    475 F.2d 414 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1973

    The Board ordered the company to pay back pay and reinstate the discriminatees. That decision was affirmed by this court in United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers, International Union v. … See NLRB v. Rice Lake Creamery Co., 124 U.S.App.D.C. 355 , 365 F.2d 888 (1966); NLRB v. Mastro Plastics Corp., 354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baptist Memorial Hospital-Golden Triangle v. Sebelius

    566 F.3d 226 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2009

    Brown v. Thompson, 374 F.3d 253, 259 (4th Cir. 2004) (A “change in statutory language need not ipso facto constitute a change in meaning or effect. … Power & Light Co. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Nicholas County Health Care Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    13 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 2001

    This appeal was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs of the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. … It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the Board’s application for enforcement be granted substantially for the reasons given by the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joseph L. Jones v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    79 F.3d 1168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 26, 1996

    See Irving Bank Corp. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 845 F.2d 1035, 1039 (D.C.Cir.1988); Investment Co. Inst. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. … Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 537 F.2d 1146, 1147 (1st Cir.1976); Bank of Commerce v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve *1171 Sys., 513 F.2d 164, 166-67 (10th Cir.1975); First Nat’l Bank v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Citizens Protective League v. Clark

    155 F.2d 290 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1946

    (d). 6 National War Labor Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 1944, 79 U.S.App. … Schwarzkopf v. Uhl, 2 Cir., 1943, 137 F.2d 898 . 16 Brown v. United States, 1814, 8 Cranch 110 , 3 L.Ed. 504 ; De Lacey v. United States, 9 Cir., 1918, 249 F. 625 , L.R.A.1918E, 1011; Grahl v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • McKenzie-Willamette Regional Medical Center Associates, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    671 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 22, 2016

    The company claims the Board appointed Hooks on January 6, 2012, at which time it lacked a *2 quorum. See N.L.R.B. v. Noel Canning, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2550, 2557, 2578 , 189 L.Ed.2d 538 (2014). … The Administrative Law Judge, in a decision the Board adopted, took official notice of the certificate. In light of that document, the Board determined—with ample support, see, e.g., Marbury v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

    637 F. App'x 611 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2016

    Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. NLRB, 330 F.3d 531, 539 (D.C.Cir.2003); accord Brennan Sand & Gravel Co., 289 N.L.R.B. 977 , 979 (1988). … Our review is confined to the reasons given by the Board. See, e.g., Macmillan Publishing Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

    637 F. App'x 613 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2016

    Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. NLRB, 330 F.3d 531, 539 (D.C.Cir.2003); accord Brennan Sand & Gravel Co., 289 N.L.R.B. 977 , 979 (1988). … Our review is confined to the reasons given by the Board. See, e.g., Macmillan Publishing Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • No. 90-1503

    949 F.2d 441 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1991

    The choice between rulemaking and adjudication is up to the Board. See NLRB v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Association v. National Labor Relations Board

    277 F.2d 681 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1960

    Connolly, its Executive Vice President and Chairman of its Wage Scale Committee, Atlantic Coast District, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 14985. … I would dismiss the petition for review as moot. 1 See Douds v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Independent, 147 F.Supp. 103 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1956), affirmed 241 F.2d 278 (2 Cir., 1957) 2 Labor Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Philip E. Forest v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army

    379 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1967

    That trial itself was envisaged by Congress as taking place before the Board of Inquiry, and explicit provision was made for a “fair and impartial” hearing. Brown v. … See Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579 , 78 S.Ct. 433 , 2 L.Ed.2d 503 (1958).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor

    228 F.2d 432 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1955

    United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 7 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 100, 105 . … United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1946, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 89, 91 , 155 F.2d 169, 171 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 147 v. National Labor Relations Board

    294 F.3d 186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 2002

    The Board has an obligation to engage in reasoned decision-making, see Penrod v. … Corp. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Elsa Maldonado v. DC

    61 F.4th 1004 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2023

    Indeed, the case is no more moot than Brown v. … See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 763 (D.C.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wilson and Sons Heating and Plumbing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    971 F.2d 758 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 1992

    Local No. 455 v. … The Board relies heavily on the decision of the First Circuit in C.E.K. Industrial Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • William v. Robbins v. George J. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of Parole

    269 F.2d 242 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1959

    In Fleming v. Tate, 81 U.S. … Tate and Moore v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Cheryl Taylor v. US Department of Agriculture

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 2011

    Finberg, Petitioners v. … Clark Deputy Clerk * Circuit Judge Brown did not participate in this matter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.