Case law

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 7, 1965

The only significant question presented is whether under our recent decision in International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots of America, Inc., et al. v. … The Board’s order will be enforced.

Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Raines

534 F.3d 779 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 2008

Nat’l Red Cross v. … Under Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, we review the District Court’s decision for abuse of discretion. 863 F.2d 59 , 68 n. 10 (D.C.Cir.1988).

Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 425 v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 314 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1969

On the facts of this case we could not upset the Board’s assertion of its jurisdiction even assuming applicability of the narrower standard suggested by Member Brown. … Employer directs us particularly to the analysis of Board Member Brown in his concurring opinion in Cloverleaf Div. of Adams Dairy Co., 147 N.L.R.B. 1410 , 1421 (1964). .

Truck Drivers & Helpers Local No. 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

386 F.2d 643 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 1967

On consideration of intervenor’s motion to dismiss and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board and of the oppositions of the National Labor Relations Board and petitioner thereto; and on consideration of … International Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agricultural Workers v. NLRB (Preston Products Co.), 126 U.S.App.D.C. 11 , 373 F.2d 671, 674 (1967). The Board takes no position on the motion to transfer.

Quazite Division of Morrison Molded Fiberglass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

87 F.3d 493 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1996

The Board’s finding that an employer violated these provisions is conclusive if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … Inc. v.

Lutcher S. A. Celulose E Papel and F. Lutcher Brown v. Inter-American Development Bank

382 F.2d 454 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1967

Lutcher Brown is president and majority shareholder of Lutcher S.A. … This insured that members would not, in the Bank’s words, intrude into “essential policy decisions * * * entrusted to its officers and Board.”

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

880 F.2d 1422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1989

We find no clear answer to this question in the Board’s precedent, and thus we leave it to the Board, in its expertise, to confront the claim initially. V. … Retail Clerks Union 1059 v.

Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington v. Environmental Protection Agency

86 F.3d 1214 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1996

Rep. 21 ,430 BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and Carol M. Browner, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. … Co. v.

Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

606 F.2d 1004 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 16, 1979

Inst. v. Board of Governors, 398 F.Supp. 725 (D.D.C. 1975). This court upheld the District Court’s ruling. Investment Co. Inst. v. Board of Governors, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 551 F.2d 1270 (1977). … National Courier Ass’n v. Board of Governors, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 301, 308 , 516 F.2d 1229 , 1236 (1975). But see Alabama Ass'n of Ins. Agents v.

Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42 v. National Labor Relations Board

450 F.2d 1322 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 24, 1971

II Our review of the Board’s determination must begin with the Supreme Court’s opinion in N.L.R.B. v. … Finally, AIOO argues that the Board’s finding is inconsistent with Associated Independent Owner-Operators, Inc. v.

Swing Staging, Inc. Swing Staging Bridging, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

994 F.2d 859 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 1993

Swing Staging v. … A party challenging a Board-run representation election bears the burden of showing that the results of such an election are invalid. See NLRB v.

British Caledonian Airways, Limited v. Civil Aeronautics Board

584 F.2d 982 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1978

In Nader v. … Skidmore v.

Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford v. National Labor Relations Board

97 F.3d 583 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1996

Of America v. … Indeed, in NLRB v.

Neiman-Marcus Co. v. Lucas

41 F.2d 300 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1930

In this the Board was clearly right. United States v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 422 , 46 S. Ct. 131 , 70 L. Ed. 347 ; Wickwire v. Reinecke, 275 U. S. 101 , 48 S. Ct. 43 , 72 L. Ed. 184 ; Williamsport Co. v. … Ed. 985 ; Avery v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 6 , 55 A. L. R. 1277; Brown v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 797 ; Rieck v. Heiner (C. C. A.) 25 F.(2d) 453 ; W. K. Henderson Iron Works & Supply Co. v.

Highway Truck Drivers And Helpers Local 107 v. National Labor Relations Board

273 F.2d 815 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1959

273 F.2d 815 107 U.S.App.D.C. 1 HIGHWAY TRUCK DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL 107, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. … MILLER, Circuit Judge. 1 Pursuant to charges made by Virginia-Carolina Freight Lines, Inc., the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board filed with the Board on August 26, 1958, a complaint alleging Highway Truck

Active Transportation Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

112 F. App'x 60 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 15, 2004

Hotel Mgmt., LLC v. … The Board, thus, had ample basis to find the parties intended to switch health and pension plans. See Capitol-Husting Co. v. NLRB, 671 F.2d 237, 243 (7th Cir.1982).

Teamsters Local Union Nos. 822 & 592 v. National Labor Relations Board

956 F.2d 317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 1992

Teamsters Local Union Nos. 822 & 592 v. NLRB, 813 F.2d 472 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (table). … Our role in reviewing the Board’s holding is not without some teeth. We defer to the Board when it interprets the Act reasonably, see NLRB v.

Duane Reade Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

99 F. App'x 240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 2004

The National Labor Relations Board (Board) found that Duane Reade, Inc. … (citing Amalgamated Local Union 355 v. NLRB, 481 F.2d 996 , 1002 n. 8 (2d Cir.1973); Dep’t Store Food Corp. v. NLRB, 415 F.2d 74 , 77 n. 4 (3d Cir.1969); NLRB v. Clement Bros.

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

637 F. App'x 613 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2016

Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. NLRB, 330 F.3d 531, 539 (D.C.Cir.2003); accord Brennan Sand & Gravel Co., 289 N.L.R.B. 977 , 979 (1988). … Our review is confined to the reasons given by the Board. See, e.g., Macmillan Publishing Co. v.

Vip Health Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

164 F.3d 644 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 1999

P 10,333 VIP HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Local 2, Federation of Nurses, United Federation of Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. … . 1 Because certification of a bargaining unit by the Board in a representation proceeding is not an "order" subject to judicial review, see American Fed'n of Labor v.