Case law

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

489 F.3d 1310 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 2007

Testing Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 160 F.3d 14, 20, 22 (D.C. Cir. 1998); accord Raven Servs. Corp. v. NLRB, 315 F.3d 499, 505 (5th Cir. 2002); Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc. v. … Detroit Typographical Union No. 18 v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 109, 117-18 (D.C. Cir. 2000); see also TruServ Corp. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 1105, 1114 & n.8 (D.C. Cir. 2001); Noel Foods, a Div. of Noel Corp. v.

Ghaith R. Pharaon v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

135 F.3d 148 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1998

In-teramericas Invs., Ltd. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 111 F.3d 376, 384 (5th Cir.1997). It is enough, as the Board found, that Pharaon agreed to act as BCCI’s nominee. … Design, Inc. v.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 7, 1965

The only significant question presented is whether under our recent decision in International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots of America, Inc., et al. v. … The Board’s order will be enforced.

Truck Drivers & Helpers Local No. 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

403 F.2d 921 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1968

No. 21,272 The Supreme Court recently said in NLRB v. … See NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 (1938). The trial examiner and the Board, which adopted his findings, found that the Company failed to meet this burden.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Brandt Airflex Corp.

645 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1981

Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, 104 F.2d 227, 228 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 640 , 59 S.Ct. 1033 , 83 L.Ed. 1521 (1939); cf. Potomac Passengers Ass’n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951).

Local 833, UAW-AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

300 F.2d 699 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 1962

O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 507-508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). . 93 Cong.Rec. 6077-78 (1947) (remarks of Sen. Taft). Cf. O’Leary v. … Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., supra note 23; Swift & Co. v. United States, 316 U.S. 216 , 62 S.Ct. 948 , 86 L.Ed. 1391 (1942) ; Allegheny Corp. v.

Ardith M. Horne v. Merit Systems Protection Board and Interstate Commerce Commission

684 F.2d 155 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1982

Healthy Board of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 279 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 572 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … The Board’s decision is therefore vacated, and the case remanded to the ICC for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. So ordered. 1 . ICC Commissioner Brown selected Horne as an attorney-advisor in 1967.

Dunkin' Donuts Mid-Atlantic Distribution Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

363 F.3d 437 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 2004

No. 22, at 3 (Sept. 30, 2002), quoting NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus., 691 F.2d 1117, 1124 (3d Cir. 1982). This is ‘‘essentially a factual issue.’’ Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473, 481 (1964). … To this end, we have required the Board to take into account employ- ee turnover. See Douglas Foods Corp. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 1056, 1066 (D.C. Cir. 2001); Avecor, Inc. v. NLRB, 931 F.2d 924, 937 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

San Antonio ex rel. City Public Service Board v. United States

631 F.2d 831 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1980

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. Wichita Bd. of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 806 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2374 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973) (quoting Board of Trade v. … Aberdeen & Rockfish R.R. v.

Walter Jackson, Jr. v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.

808 F.3d 933 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 2015

The District Court granted summary judgment to the Board. Jackson v. Mabus, 56 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2014). We review the District Court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Roberts v. … See, e.g., Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

381 F.2d 265 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1967

Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Eugene L. … And in Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v.

Quazite Division of Morrison Molded Fiberglass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

87 F.3d 493 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1996

The Board’s finding that an employer violated these provisions is conclusive if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. … Inc. v.

Paralyzed Veterans Of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board

752 F.2d 694 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1985

In North Haven Board of Education v. … Sec. 1681 (a) (1982)) 88 See, e.g., Brown v.

Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers, Local 633 v. National Labor Relations Board

509 F.2d 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1974

This Court refused to accept the Board’s position based on its loss in NLRB v. … The need for this safe harbor is considerably lessened by the Board’s new practice on authorization cards announced at oral argument in Gissel, 395 U.S. at 594 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , and is eliminated altogether by the Board’s

John S. Wertz v. Brown & Root, Inc., Raymond International, Inc., Walsh Construction Co.

316 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1963

Retail Clerks International Ass'n Local No. 455 v. National Labor Relations Board

510 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1975

Div. v. NLRB, 492 F.2d 63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Local 445, Electrical Workers v. Sperry Systems Mgmt. Div., 419 U.S. 831 , 95 S.Ct. 55 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974); Boire v. … While the Board may defer to arbitration on the issue of accretion to an existing unit, both the Board and the courts have required that any award be consistent with Board bargaining unit policy. See Boire v.

Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local Union No. 745, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America v. National Labor Relations Board

355 F.2d 842 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1966

with such problems. 8 Where good faith bargaining has not resolved a key issue and where there are no definite plans for further efforts to break the deadlock, the Board is warranted, see American Ship Building Co. v. … N.L.R.B. v.

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

880 F.2d 1422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1989

We find no clear answer to this question in the Board’s precedent, and thus we leave it to the Board, in its expertise, to confront the claim initially. V. … Retail Clerks Union 1059 v.

George W. Melson v. Thomas R. Sard

402 F.2d 653 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1968

In Garrity v. … See Boswell v. United States Bd. of Parole, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 311, 315 , 388 F.2d 567, 571 (1967); Brown v. Taylor, 287 F.2d 334 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 970 , 81 S.Ct. 1933 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1259 (1961).

Louis DeNaples v. Office of the Comptroller of Currency

706 F.3d 481 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 2013

Kuray, Attorney.  2 Before: ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … But that does not mean the Board has exclusive enforcement authority over § 19 violations. See, e.g., United States v.