Case law

Adam Bloom v. National Labor Relations Board, United Parcel Service, Inc., Intervenor

603 F.2d 1015 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 1979

See, e. g., Arnold Co. v. Carpenters District Council, 417 U.S. 12, 16-17 , 94 S.Ct. 2069 , 40 L.Ed.2d 620 ; Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Co., supra, at 270-72, 84 S.Ct. 401 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … In Banyard v.

Sign & Pictorial Union Local 1175 v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 23, 1969

In such instances, Congress has decided that the Board’s inference shall control”, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO v. … Recognizing that where unilateral wage action of this kind is shown the inferences to be drawn from the evidence must be left to the Board, N.L.R.B. v.

Plasterers Local Union No. 79 v. National Labor Relations Board

440 F.2d 174 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 1971

. v. … B. v.

Pan American Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

171 F.2d 139 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1948

The findings and opinion in this' so-called Second Atlantic case do not appear in the printed volumes of the Board’s decisions, but they are available in mimeographed form. Transcontinental & Western Air v. … Docket No. 1706 before the Board; now No. 9674 in this court. Board Docket No. 1499; now No. 9675 in this court. See. 406(a) of the Civil Aeronautics Act, 52 Stat. 998 (1938), 49 U.S.C.A. § 486 (a); Morgan v.

United Packinghouse, Food & Allied Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

416 F.2d 1126 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1969

In its historic decision in Brown v. … This circumstance does not gainsay the Supreme Court’s finding in Brown v.

Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union Local 535 v. National Labor Relations Board

310 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1962

The sole issue before us is whether substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole supports the Board’s finding. We hold that the finding is thus supported. … The Board’s order will accordingly be affirmed and enforced. So ordered.

Medco Health Solutions of Las Vegas, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

701 F.3d 710 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 2012

See, e.g., United Steelworkers, AFL- CIO-CLC v. Marshall, 647 F.2d 1189, 1236 (D.C. Cir 1980). Before the Board and on appeal Medco has invoked New River Industries, Inc. v. … We recognize that “the Board draws on a fund of knowledge and expertise all its own,” NLRB v.

Detroit Newspaper Agency v. National Labor Relations Board

171 F. App'x 352 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 2006

Our review “is limited to determining whether the Board’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence” in the record as a whole, and if so, “whether the Board acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying established … Stanford Hosp. & Clinics v. NLRB, 370 F.3d 1210, 1212 (D.C.Cir.2004). The Board’s findings are supported by the testimony of multiple witnesses, as well as by other direct evidence.

United Transportation Union-General Committee of Adjustment v. Surface Transportation Board

363 F.3d 465 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 2004

The termination of a trackage rights agreement is among the transactions requiririg Board approval, Thompson v. Texas Mexican Ry. … Further, the Board may not create exemptions that relieve rail carriers of their obligations to *31 protect the interests of employees. 49 U.S.C. § 10502 (g); see also McGinness v.

Paralyzed Veterans Of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board

804 F.2d 1306 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1986

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Respondents, Regional Airline Association, Intervenor. No. 83-1055. … Before WALD, Chief Judge and MIKVA, Circuit Judge. * PER CURIAM. 1 In Paralyzed Veterans of America v.

Artis, Cynthia v. Greenspan, Alan

158 F.3d 1301 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1998

."); see also Barnes v. … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 15 (D.C.

Ari Bailey v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.

793 F.3d 127 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 2015

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. … Court of Appeals had already explained the broad discretion retained by the Board under the 1987 Regulations. Davis v. Henderson, 652 A.2d 634 (D.C.1995); White v.

Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. National Labor Relations Board

863 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1988

See Southwest Regional Joint Bd. v. … See NLRB v.

Northwest Graphics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

156 F. App'x 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2005

The record easily supports the Board’s decisions. … . § 160 (e) (Board’s factual findings are “conclusive” upon this court if “supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole”); Tualatin Elec., Inc. v.

Truck Drivers And Helpers Local Union 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

249 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1957

B. v. Denver Bldg. & Const. Trades Council, supra, 341 U.S. at page 692, 71 S.Ct. at page 953. 8 We recognize the doubt, but we must give weight to the resolution of it by the Board. … Carlson v. People of State of California, 310 U.S. 106 , 60 S.Ct. 746 , 84 L.Ed. 1104 ; Thornhill v. State of Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 , 60 S.Ct. 736 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 .

Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v. National Labor Relations Board

334 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 1964

Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.), supra; and Brown v. Local No. 17, Amalgamated Lithographers, N.D.Cal., 180 F.Supp. 294 (1960). … Employing Lithographers of Greater Miami v. N. L. R. B., supra, at 24-27 of 301 F.2d; N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.), supra, at 45 of 309 F.2d; Brown v.

International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 62-B v. National Labor Relations Board

781 F.2d 919 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1986

On January 10, 1981, Jay Browne and Larry Cotter, officials of the Union, called Mr. Head of ATC. Browne and Cotter told Head that they wanted Union members to load the Eastern Hope. … In enforcing this section, the Board is required to “hear and determine the dispute .... ” Section 10(k), 29 U.S.C. § 160 (k) (1982); see NLRB v.

International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

184 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 1950

These and other contentions were resolved against the petitioners by the Board. We agree with its conclusions. … Reference is made to the Board’s decision and order reported in Volume 83 at page 916 of the Decisions and Orders of the National Labor Relations Board. See also National Labor Relations Board v.

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

489 F.3d 1310 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 2007

Testing Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 160 F.3d 14, 20, 22 (D.C. Cir. 1998); accord Raven Servs. Corp. v. NLRB, 315 F.3d 499, 505 (5th Cir. 2002); Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc. v. … Detroit Typographical Union No. 18 v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 109, 117-18 (D.C. Cir. 2000); see also TruServ Corp. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 1105, 1114 & n.8 (D.C. Cir. 2001); Noel Foods, a Div. of Noel Corp. v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Brandt Airflex Corp.

645 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1981

Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, 104 F.2d 227, 228 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 640 , 59 S.Ct. 1033 , 83 L.Ed. 1521 (1939); cf. Potomac Passengers Ass’n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951).