Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.49s
Office Employees International Union, Local No. 11 v. National Labor Relations Board
235 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1956
For example, in National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. & Const. … National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, 18 , 63 S.Ct. 394 , 87 L.Ed. 579 (1943); National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 3 timesPublished801 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1986
To the contrary, it appears that the Board’s decision may “obviate the need for judicial intervention.” Schlesinger v. … This case presents us with the dilemma and opportunity of choosing which path to follow. *260 In Brown v.
Cited 79 timesPublishedMcCormick v. District of Columbia
752 F.3d 980 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 2014
See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569–70 (1972). At first reading, the record does not support a conclusion that the District of Columbia deprived appellant of a legally protected interest. … And the Eighth Circuit found adequate a hearing where a dismissed school supervisor was given unlimited time to speak before the school board and have his attorney speak on his behalf. Hammer v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedGarvey v. National Transportation Safety Board
190 F.3d 571 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1999
Martin v. … It is also the position the FAA has consistently taken in litigation before the Board. See Administrator v. Gentile, 6 N.T.S.B. 60 , 64 (1988); Administrator v. Wells, 1 N.T.S.B. 1472 , 1474 (1971).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBraniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Intervenor
379 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1967
Invoking Civil Aeronautics Board v. … Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1, 67 , 81 S.Ct. 1357, 1395 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961).
Cited 256 timesPublishedFruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen Local 760 v. National Labor Relations Board
316 F.2d 389 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1963
The Union argues that the position taken by the Board on this issue contravenes the spirit, if not the precise holding, of National Labor Relations Board v. Truitt Mfg. … That is a matter for the Board in the first instance.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
117 F.3d 1454 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1997
Skyline Distribs. v. NLRB, 99 F.3d 403, 411 (D.C.Cir.1996). In NLRB v. … But see NLRB v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTrinity Services Group, Inc. v. NLRB
998 F.3d 978 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 2021
We review the Board’s factual findings for substantial evidence. See Davidson Hotel Co. v. NLRB, 977 F.3d 1289, 1292 (D.C. … Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67 (2008). Unless the employer threatens “reprisal or force” or promises “benefit[s],” such expressions “cannot be used as evidence of an unfair labor practice.” Sasol N. Am. Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedEastern Air Lines, Inc., and National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
354 F.2d 507 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1965
Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. … Furthermore, we think its action fully within the Board’s discretion and not subject to review. ****** An order will be entered, to take effect ten days after the date of this opinion, approving the order of the Board of
Cited 75 timesPublishedInternational Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
262 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 24, 1958
Were we sitting as members of the Board we might well have reached a different conclusion from that of the Board but, within the limited scope of our appellate review, we are unable to say that the finding of the Board that … Federal Communications Commission v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp., 1955, 349 U.S. 358 , 75 S.Ct. 855 , 99 L.Ed. 1147 . See also Universal Camera Corp. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMarjam Supply Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
213 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 2007
Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947). … ., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRafael E. Chirino v. National Transportation Safety Board and Secretary of Transportation
849 F.2d 1525 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 1988
Administrator v. … See, e.g., Administrator v. Klayer, 1 N.T.S.B. 982 (1970); Administrator v. Powell, NTSB Order No.
Cited 28 timesPublishedInternational Union, United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
257 F.2d 211 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1958
In Penello v. International Union, U.M. … In International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. W. L. Mead, Inc., 1 Cir., 230 F.2d 576 , and United Construction Workers v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedEmployers Group of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc. v. National War Labor Board
143 F.2d 145 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1944
. v. … United States Railroad Labor Board, 261 U.S. 72, 84 , 43 S.Ct. 278, 283 , 67 L.Ed. 536 . 33 Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedWilliam R. Deaton v. District of Columbia Board of Parole
180 F.2d 396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1950
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint for a mandatory injunction to require the Parole Board to reverse its action and exercise in appellant’s favor the Board’s discretion under D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHerbert Glenn v. George J. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of Parole
289 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1961
The Board of Parole held a ■“hearing” on December 10, 1958 and revoked parole on March 13,1959. … Moore v. Reid, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 379 , 246 F.2d 654, 660 ; Fleming v. Tate, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 205, 206 , 156 F.2d 848, 849 .
Cited 17 timesPublishedChaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. England
454 F.3d 290 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2006
Glenn Cohen, Attorney. 2 Before: HENDERSON , ROGERS and BROWN , Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN . … Bd., 354 F.3d 249, 261 (4th Cir. 2003); Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Transp., 321 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2003); Tenafly Eruv Ass’n v. Borough of Tenafly, 309 F.3d 144, 178 (3d Cir. 2002); Iowa Right to Life Comm., Inc. v.
Cited 635 timesPublishedAmerican Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. National Labor Relations Board
395 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1968
We begin by noting the deference a court gives to a Board finding of impasse. See Dallas General Drivers etc. v. … The Board’s decision and order, issued March 20, 1967, are reported at 163 NLRB No. 55 . . The Act appears at 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (1964). . NLRB v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Courier Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
516 F.2d 1229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1975
See, e. g., Washington Research Project v. HEW, 164 U.S.App. D.C. 169, 504 F.2d 238 (1974); Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, 160 U.S.App. D.C. 270, 491 F.2d 63 (1974); Norris v. Hirshberg, supra. … See also Independent Bankers Ass’n v. Federal Reserve Board, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 278 , 516 F.2d 1206 (No. 73-2025), filed July 31, 1975). . S.Rep.
Cited 58 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors of Fair-Fax County, Virginia v. Bond
612 F.2d 586 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1980
612 F.2d 586 198 U.S.App.D.C. 91 Board of Supervisors of Fair-fax County, Virginia v. Bond No. 78-1813 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 1/23/80 1 F.A.A. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna