Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.09s
Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
989 F.2d 515 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1993
See LTV Electrosystems, Inc. v. NLRB, 408 F.2d 1122, 1127 (4th Cir. 1969); United States v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 337 F.Supp. 381 (S.D.N.Y.1971); United States v. … The Board’s findings are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence and we give “substantial deference to inferences drawn from the facts.” Avecor, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedInvestment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
551 F.2d 1270 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1977
See Brief for Respondent Board of Governors at 46 n. 17, National Courier Ass’n v. Board of Governors, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 516 F.2d 1229 (1975). … Agents v. Board of Governors, supra, 160 U.S.App.D.C. at 145-146 , 489 F.2d at 1270-71 . See also Alabama Ass’n of Ins. Agents v.
Cited 125 timesPublished71 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1934
In reaching our conclusion, we have examined the cases of Hill v. Commissioner (C. C. A. 4) 66 F.(2d) 45 ; Commissioner v. Brown (C. C. A. 7) 69 F.(2id) 602, decided March 22, 1984; Robinson v. Commissioner (C. C. … As to those after 1926, the Board having decided such payments were in the peculiar facts shown capital transactions, the court sustained the Board on the ground there was substantial evidence on which the Board’s decision
Cited 29 timesPublishedAndrew Hofer v. Alan K. Campbell, Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission
581 F.2d 975 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 1978
In Richardson v. … . § 1981 , and the Fifth Amendment (emphasis added),” this court held, citing Brown v.
Cited 31 timesPublishedRetail Store Employees Union Local 880 v. National Labor Relations Board
419 F.2d 329 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1969
Atlantic Seaboard Refining Co. v. FPC, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 291 , 404 F.2d 1268 (1968). Here the Board drew a distinction, as will appear below, between the cases of Woe and Grund. . Quotation from Lorain Journal Co. v. … We think the Board was well within its discretion. See, e. g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947) ; S. D. Warren Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished23 F.2d 765 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1927
On appeal, the decision of the board was affirmed. … Lindmark v. Hodgkinson, 31 App. D. C. 612; Kirby v. Clements, 44 App. D. C. 12; Brown v. Tomlinson, 49 App. D. C. 310, 265 F. 460 ; Scott v. Longtin, 52 App. D. C. 102, 281 F. 606 ; In re Levy, 55 App. D.
Cited 2 timesPublishedInternational Molders & Allied Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board
410 F.2d 1061 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1969
B. v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9 , 82 S.Ct. 1099 , 8 L.Ed.2d 298 (1962); N. L. R. B. v. Phaostron Instrument & Electronic Co., 9 Cir., 344 F.2d 855 (1965). … Accordingly, we hold in abeyance our determination of this issue. 4 Otherwise the Board’s order will be enforced without awaiting that determination. So ordered. . Tyler Pipe & Foundry Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDaily News of Los Angeles v. National Labor Relations Board
73 F.3d 406 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 1996
NLRB v. Allied Prods. Corp., 548 F.2d 644, 652-53 (6th Cir.1977) (citations omitted); see also NLRB v. … UAW v. NLRB (Udylite Corp.), 455 F.2d 1357, 1365 (D.C.Cir.1971). Likewise, in NLRB v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedTeamsters Local Union No. 175 v. National Labor Relations Board
788 F.2d 27 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 1986
American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. NLRB, 395 F.2d 622 (D.C.Cir.1968) 6 American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. … Taft Broadcasting Co., 163 N.L.R.B. at 478. 8 See District 65, Distributive Workers of America v. NLRB, 593 F.2d 1155 , 1164 (D.C.Cir.1978); Dallas General Drivers, Local No. 745 v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRaymond Richardson, Jr. v. Hugh F. Rivers, D. C. Board of Parole
335 F.2d 996 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1964
Brown, 230 F.2d 465, 467 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 971 , 76 S.Ct. 1041 , 100 L.Ed. 1490 (1956): “It is clear that although the order of dismissal stated that it was granted on a motion to dismiss for failure to state … And in Dewey v.
Cited 43 timesPublishedAnna Allen v. National Labor Relations Board, Yellow Freight System, Intervenor
561 F.2d 976 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 1, 1977
Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 290-291 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488, 496-497 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Local 441, Int. Brhd of Elec. Wkrs v. … NLRB v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 290 , 85 S.Ct. 980 ; Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, supra, 340 U.S. at 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456 ; Midwest Regional Joint Board v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedTeamsters Local Union No. 175 v. National Labor Relations Board
788 F.2d 27 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 1986
American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. NLRB, 395 F.2d 622 (D.C.Cir.1968). . American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. NLRB, 395 F.2d at 628. . … See District 65, Distributive Workers of America v. NLRB, 593 F.2d 1155 , 1164 (D.C.Cir.1978); Dallas General Drivers, Local No. 745 v. NLRB, 355 F.2d 842 , 844-45 (D.C.Cir.1966). .
Cited 1 timesPublishedInternational Ladies' Garment Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board
414 F.2d 1214 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1969
the[ir] unlawful effect * * *." 6 Compare Retail Store Employees Union Local 880 v. … N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., et al., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 547 , Sinclair Company v. N.L.R.B., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). . Id. at 615 , at 1940 of 89 S.Ct. .
Cited 1 timesPublished140 F.4th 506 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 2025
The Board, with the Supreme Court’s approval, has recognized that the “use of impasse” is a legitimate “bargaining tactic.” Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 518 U.S. 231, 239 (1996). … Because the parties were at an “impasse,” we do not reach the issue. 9 See, e.g., Brown, 518 U.S. at 246; Thrifty Payless, Inc. v. NLRB, 86 F.4th 909, 917 (D.C. Cir. 2023); Laurel Bay Health & Rehab. Ctr. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedInternational Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. National Labor Relations Board
575 F.2d 896 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1978
See generally 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(E) (1976); NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Alabama, Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 64 , 96 S.Ct. 612 , 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976) (per curiam); accord, Elrod v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Ass'n of Casualty & Surety Agents v. Board of Governors
862 F.2d 351 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1988
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Mcclatchy Newspapers, Inc.
964 F.2d 1153 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1992
Case Co. v. … But the Board is comparing apples and oranges. In none of the cases the Board cites did the employer attempt to bargain about the change before enacting it. See NLRB v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Federation Of Television And Radio Artists v. National Labor Relations Board
462 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1972
The Board, with one member dissenting, adopted the examiner's decision. … See Federal Land Bank v. Bismarck Lumber Co., 314 U.S. 95, 99-100 , 62 S.Ct. 1 , 86 L.Ed. 65 (1941); Argosy Limited v. Hennigan, 404 F.2d 14, 20 (5th Cir. 1968); United States v.
Cited 14 timesPublished801 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1986
To the contrary, it appears that the Board’s decision may “obviate the need for judicial intervention.” Schlesinger v. … This case presents us with the dilemma and opportunity of choosing which path to follow. *260 In Brown v.
Cited 79 timesPublishedThomas-Davis Medical Centers, P.C. v. National Labor Relations Board
157 F.3d 909 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1998
We reject FPA's challenge because the Board's refusal was not an abuse of discretion. See Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. NLRB, 789 F.2d 9, 14 (D.C. … ."); Soft Drink Workers Union Local 812 v. NLRB, 937 F.2d 684, 688 (D.C. Cir. 1991); NLRB v. Mar Salle, Inc., 425 F.2d 566, 571-72 (D.C. Cir. 1970); Amalgamated Clothing Workers of Am. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna