Case law

Paul Lawrence Kendall v. Army Board for Correction of Military Records

996 F.2d 362 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1993

See Walters v. … See Engle v.

San Antonio ex rel. City Public Service Board v. United States

655 F.2d 1341 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1981

San Antonio, Texas v. United States, 631 F.2d 831 (D.C.Cir.1980). . San Antonio, Texas v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 355 I.C.C. 405 (1976), aff'd, 555 F.2d 637 (8th Cir. 1977). . Id. at 418. . San Antonio, Texas v. … San Antonio, Texas v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 364 I.C.C. 887 (1981).

Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

564 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2009

Asiana Airlines v. FAA, 134 F.3d 393, 398 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting C.F. Commc’ns Corp. v. FCC, 128 F.3d 735, 739 (D.C. Cir. 1997)). … See United States v.

Local 1441, Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

326 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1963

We remand the case to the Board for the taking of the testimony of Ungar and LaVictor, together with any other testimony which may assist the Board in determining whether or not a conspiracy to violate the sections of the … If the Board finds that such a conspiracy did exist, it will provide appropriate remedies. So ordered. .

U-Haul Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

490 F.3d 957 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 2007

We review the Board’s Decision and Order for abuse of discretion. See Canadian Am. Oil Co. v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 469, 473 (D.C. Cir. 1996). … Co. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 343, 348 (1984).

Plumbers And Steamfitters Local 342 v. National Labor Relations Board

598 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1979

NLRB v. … of the agency. 36 Contrary to the majority's assertions, affirming the Board's decision on the construction suggested by the Board's counsel does not violate the doctrine of SEC v.

Cordelia Kelsey, Infant, by Her Parent, Louise Kelsey v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Individually and as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

498 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1974

Douds, supra note 38 , 339 U.S. at 407 ; United States v. CIO, supra note 38 , 335 U.S. at 121. 44 . Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). 45 . Bolling v. … Brown v. Board of Educ., supra note 46, 349 U.S. at 300-301 . 52 . Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., supra note 31, 402 U.S. at 18. 53 . Id. 54 . Brown v. Board of Educ., supra note 46, 349 U.S. at 301 . 55 .

Charlotte Amphitheater Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1996

See also NLRB v. … While there may be merit to this argument, it is not to be found in the Board's decision. In a petition for enforcement, a court may consider only the Board's own reasons, not the rationalizations of counsel. SEC v.

Epilepsy Foundation v. National Labor Relations Board

268 F.3d 1095 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 2001

Thus, as noted in NLRB v. … See NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.

Local 1441 v. National Labor Relations Board

326 F.2d 663 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1964

326 F.2d 663 LOCAL 1441, RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, and Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Central States Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, and Kentuckiana Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing

Teamsters Local Union No. 328 v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 688 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1969

Accordingly, we grant enforcement in No. 21,977; and we affirm the Board’s disposition of the Grunlund matter in No. 21,913. See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 379 U.S. 203 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 , 6 A.L.R.3d 1130 (1964); United Steelworkers of America v. N. L. R. B.

National Labor Relations Board v. Maywood Plant of Grede Plastics

628 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1980

Cir. 1971); NLRB v. … This does not imply that changed circumstances like those in this case will make a Board order moot. Generally, they will not. See NLRB v. Raytheon Co., 398 U.S. 25 , 90 S.Ct. 1547 , 26 L.Ed.2d 21 (1970); NLRB v.

Goya Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

298 F. App'x 12 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 2008

This cause was considered on a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) and was briefed and argued by counsel. … See Sociedad Española de Auxilio Mutuo y Beneficiencia de P.R. v. NLRB, 414 F.3d 158, 166 (1st Cir.2005); see also Adair Standish Corp. v.

Finch, Pruyn & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

296 F. App'x 83 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 25, 2008

Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. NLRB, 862 F.2d 354 , 357 n. 2 (D.C.Cir. 1988). … Tradesmen Int’l, Inc. v. NLRB, 275 F.3d 1137, 1141 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Int’l Union of Elec., Elec., Salaried, Mach. & Furniture Workers v. NLRB, 41 F.3d 1532 , 1536 (D.C.Cir. 1994)). Pursuant to D.C.

Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

283 F.2d 189 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1960

Civil Aeronautics Board, 1952, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 330 , 197 F.2d 384 ; see American Trucking Ass'ns v. United States, 1957, 355 U.S. 141 , 78 S.Ct. 165 , 2 L.Ed.2d 158 ; United States v. … Since Southeast was fairly on notice that Southern was in a competitive position for the Tennessee route, the Board could properly certify Southern. Civil Aeronautics Board v.

Local Union No. 112, International Union Allied Industrial Workers v. Rothman

209 F. Supp. 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1962

In Capital Service, Inc. et al. v. N. L. R. … The National Labor Relations Act is a law ‘regulating commerce’ (National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 [14] [, 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 ]).”

L. P. Steuart & Bro., Inc. v. Bowles

140 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1944

Brown, Administrator, v. Wilemon, 5 Cir., 139 F.2d 730 . Act of May 31, 1941, 55 Stat. 236 , which amended the Act of Tune 28, 1940, 54 Stat. 676 . Perkins v. Brown, D.G.,S.D.Ga., 53 F.Supp. 176 . … Wright v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 89 ; Nichols & Co. v. Secretary of Agriculture, 1 Cir., 131 F.2d 651 ; Nelson v. Secretary of Agriculture, 7 Cir., 133 F.2d 453 .

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. v. Hirsch Lumber Co.

35 F.2d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1929

In Thomas & Willis v. Wooldridge, 2 Woods, 667 , 23 Fed. Cas. page 986 , No. 13,918, in which Mr. … L. p. 807, § 37; Henry v. Gold Park Mining Co. (C. C.) 15 F. 649 ; American Bank v. Rollins, 99 Mass. 313 ; American Bank v. Snow, 9 R. I. 11, 98 Am. Dec. 364 ; Burrill v. Letson, 2 Speers (S. C.) 378.

Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

277 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1960

Counsel, Litigation and Research, Civil Aeronautics Board, with whom Messrs. Franklin M. Stone, Gen. Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, John H. Wanner, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, Ulrich V. … But in Civil Aeronautics Board v.

Tic-The Industrial Company Southeast, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

126 F.3d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 7, 1997

Evidence of Anti-Union Discrimination Board findings must be respected on review if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e) (1994); Laro Maintenance Corp. v. … Galloway Co. v. NLRB, 856 F.2d 275, 280 (D.C.Cir.1988).