Case law

Waremart Foods v. National Labor Relations Board

354 F.3d 870 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 2004

In the Board’s view, Lechmere, Inc. v. … Unless California law is what the Board says it is, this case is indistinguishable from Lechmere and the Board’s decision is in error. See ITT Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 995, 1000-03 (D.C.Cir.2001).

Association Of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

162 F.3d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1998

The Board is left to decipher which "employees [ ] may be affected thereby." 28 Under the ruling of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. … Workers v. ICC, 862 F.2d 330 (D.C.Cir.1988). The Board reiterated this proposition at oral argument.

Precision Concrete v. National Labor Relations Board

362 F.3d 847 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 2003

Galloway Co. v. NLRB, 856 F.2d 275, 279 (D.C. … In Drug Plastics, 30 F.3d at 172–73, we upheld the Board’s test pursuant to Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v.

Waremart Foods v. National Labor Relations Board

354 F.3d 870 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2003

In the Board’s view, Lechmere, Inc. v. … Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 (1972),  4 and Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980).

Brown & Bigelow, Paul W. Felt v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

232 F.2d 41 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1955

Black-Clawson Co. v. Centrifugal Engineering & P. Corp., 6 Cir., 1936, 83 F.2d 116 , certiorari denied, 1936, 299 U.S. 554 , 57 S.Ct. 16 , 81 L.Ed. 408 . … Kistler v. Coe, 1944, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 36 , 142 F.2d 94 ; Application of Ashbaugh, 1949, 173 F.2d 273, 274 , 36 C.C.P.A., Patents, 902. Under the circumstances, there is no error in the judgment of the District Court.

North of Market Senior Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

204 F.3d 1163 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 2000

A The Integrity of the Election The Board attempts, as near as possible, to hold elections in a laboratory *1168 condition. See NLRB v. … Electrical Workers IUE v. NLRB, 67 L.R.R.M. 2361 (D.D.C.1968), acq. 171 N.L.R.B. 21 (1968), enf'd. NLRB v.

Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

547 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1976

The Board’s orders were granted enforcement in all respects by this court. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. … Perhaps more important, the Board failed to cite more recent authority in both this circuit, see Case v.

Post Tension of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

331 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 2009

The employer contends the Board’s findings are unsupported by substantial evidence. In accord with our “highly deferential” standard of review, Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc., v. … relationship,” NLRB v.

Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild, Local 82 v. National Labor Relations Board

877 F.2d 998 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1989

See NLRB v. Food Fair Stores, Inc., 307 F.2d 3, 14 (3d Cir.1962). The “membership” that can be required as a condition of employment is thus “whittled down to its financial core.” NLRB v. … Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), to a Board interpretation of ambiguous statutory language so long as its construction is “rational and consistent with the statute,” NLRB v.

Stephens v. US Airways Group, Inc.

908 F. Supp. 2d 10 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 2012

See Taylor v. D.C. … See id. at 442 n. 1 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring) ("Judge Brown's opinion is the controlling opinion in this case because it presents the narrowest grounds of the opinions forming a majority.” (citing Marks v.

Waremart Foods v. National Labor Relations Board

354 F.3d 870 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 2004

Unless California law is what the Board says it is, this case is indistinguishable from Lechmere and the Board’s decision is in error. See ITT Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 995, 1000–03 (D.C. Cir. 2001). … Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), a state law prohibited but then ‘‘dismissed review’’ without deciding the case. See CALI- FORNIA RULES OF COURT § 976(d); Stephen R.

Bernard S. Brown and Aaron A. Paulson v. Walter N. Tobriner, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, 2501-03 Fourteenth Street Cooperative Association v. Walter N. Tobriner, Commissioners of the District of Columbia

312 F.2d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1962

BROWN and Aaron A. Paulson, Appellants, v. Walter N. TOBRINER et al., Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellees. 2501-03 FOURTEENTH STREET COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. Walter N. … Brown and Paulson, along with their wives and a third party, were its founders. Brown's wife and Paulson were its first President and Secretary, respectively.

Wisconsin Bankers Association v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

589 F.2d 734 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1978

589 F.2d 734 191 U.S.App.D.C. 211 Wisconsin Bankers Association v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System No. 78-1083 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 10/27/78 1 B.G.F.R.S. 2 REMANDED *

Eugene Nyambal v. International Monetary Fund

772 F.3d 277 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 2014

Before: TATEL and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. … Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.  2 BROWN, Circuit Judge: The International Monetary Fund’s (“Fund’s”) motion to dismiss this tort suit was converted into a discovery

Commercial Solvents Corp. v. Mellon

277 F. 548 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1922

The decisions chiefly relied upon are United States v. United Verde Co., 196 U. S. 207 , 25 Sup. Ct. 222, 49 L. Ed. 449 ; Waite v. Macy, 246 U. S. 606 , 38 Sup. Ct. 395, 62 L. Ed. 892 ; Macy v. Browne (D. … C.) 215 Fed. 456 ; and Macy v. Browne, 224 Fed. 359 , 140 C. C. A. 45 .

West Coast Sheet Metal, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

938 F.2d 1356 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 16, 1991

Our review of the Board’s interpretation is guided by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). See Hammontree v. … Workers v.

Freund Baking Company v. National Labor Relations Board

165 F.3d 928 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1999

P 10,356 FREUND BAKING COMPANY, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. … See Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U.S. 731, 741 , 103 S.Ct. 2161 , 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983). In support of this argument, the Board points to NAACP v.

Allentown Mack Sales and Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

83 F.3d 1483 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 1996

In this situation, the only proper course is for us to defer to the Board. Fall River, 482 U.S. at 42 , 107 S.Ct. at 2235 ; Beth Israel Hosp. v. … NLRB v. A.W. Thompson, Inc., 651 F.2d 1141, 1144-45 (5th Cir.1981); Thomas Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 687 F.2d 863, 867 (6th Cir.1982); Ming-tree Restaurant, Inc. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 1295 , 1297-99 (9th Cir.1984). .

Paul Lawrence Kendall v. Army Board for Correction of Military Records

996 F.2d 362 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1993

See Walters v. … See Engle v.

Randy Brown v. DC

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 2023

September Term, 2022 1:16-cv-00947-EGS Filed On: May 31, 2023 Randy Brown … , Appellant v.