Case law

Saint-Gobain Industrial Ceramics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

310 F.3d 778 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 2002

eligibility, NLRB v. … Agency San Francisco v. NLRB, 163 F.3d 1369 , 1373 & n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1999). Our review of the Board’s unfair labor practice finding is for substantial evidence in the record as a whole. See Universal Camera Corp. v.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

334 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1964

Involved is the validity of an order of the National Labor Relations Board entered after usual administrative proceedings within the agency. … We think the evidence did not require the Board to uphold the Union’s claim in this respect.

Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

449 F.2d 1058 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1971

In this case the Board’s legal error resulted in no prejudice to the Union. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 411-412 , 379 F.2d 453, 465-466 (1967). … Compare NLRB v.

Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 425, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Intervenor. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. National Labor Relations Board, Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 425, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

419 F.2d 314 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1969

assertion of its jurisdiction even assuming applicability of the narrower standard suggested by Member Brown. … Indeed the Board's panel happened to consist of Chairman McCulloch and Members Brown and Zagoria, and there was no dissent. This controversy was not clearly a mere question of contract interpretation.

Capital Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

171 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1948

In view of the finality of the rates, which stood unchallenged for more than three years, the Board was without power to revise them retroactively. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. … Federal Power Commission v. National Gas Pipeline Co., 1942, 315 U.S. 575, 590 , 62 S.Ct. 736 , 86 L.Ed. 1037 , and cases cited.

Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board

331 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1964

Subversive Activities Control Board, decided April 25, 1963, 3 and in No. 13260, National Council of American-Soviet Friendship v. … With this proviso the order of the Board is Affirmed. . Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1 , 81 S.Ct. 1357 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). . Tit.

Retail, Wholesale & Department Stoke Union v. National Labor Relations Board

466 F.2d 380 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 1972

See NLRB v. Local Union No. 1229, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 346 U.S. 464, 476 , 74 S.Ct. 172 , 98 L.Ed. 195 (1953). . NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 451 (8th Cir. 1963). . … Brown & Root, 132 NLRB 486 (1961), enforced 311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 3963) ; American Flint Glass Workers’ Union v.

Consumers Union of the U.S., Inc. v. Federal Reserve Board

938 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1991

Pursuant to that end, the Board is entitled to wide and respectful deference in its implementation of the statute. See Anderson Bros. Ford v. … And, of course, with respect to the interpretation of statutory ambiguities, the Board is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.

Board of Pharmacy of the District of Columbia v. Feldman

279 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1960

Board of Pharmacy, in which the Board had declined to renew respondent’s license as a druggist, and remanded the case to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the court’s opinion. Feldman v. … Board of Pharmacy of the District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App.1960, 160 A.2d 100 . The Board now petitions this court for the allowance of an appeal from the court’s decision.

Seafarers International Union of North America v. National Labor Relations Board

265 F.2d 585 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1959

265 F.2d 585 SEAFARERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, ATLANTIC & GULF DISTRICT, HARBOR AND INLAND WATERWAYS DIVISION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 14373. … . § 163 8 Holy Trinity Church v. United States, 143 U.S. 457 , 12 S.Ct. 511 , 36 L.Ed. 226 (1892); United States v. Kirby, 7 Wall. 482 , 74 U.S. 482 , 19 L.Ed. 278 (1869) 9 NLRB v. Denver Bldg. & Const.

Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

80 F.3d 485 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 1996

NLRB v. … See generally NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 286-90 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 985-88 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); American Ship Bldg. Co. v. NLRB, 380 U.S. 300, 312-13 , 85 S.Ct. 955, 964 , 13 L.Ed.2d 855 (1965).

Insurance Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

360 F.2d 823 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1966

See General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200, 206 , 56 S.Ct. 185 , SO L.Ed. 154 (1935). . National Labor Relations Board v. American Nat. Ins. … Wkrs., etc. v. N.L.R.B., 120 U.S. App.D.C. 45, 343 F.2d 327 (1965). In City of Chicago v.

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. National Labor Relations Board

858 F.2d 756 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 30, 1988

In NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

393 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1968

II The Board’s finding that the company’s no-solicitation rules unlawfully infringed upon employees’ rights is obviously correct. Republic Aviation Corp. v. N. L. R. … B. v. Allen Manufacturing Co., 6 Cir., 364 F.2d 814, 816 (1966); Anchor Manufacturing Co. v. N. L. R. B., 5 Cir., 300 F.2d 301, 303 (1962). We too find their use unobjectionable and within the competence of the Board.

International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Honorable Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense

698 F.2d 536 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1983

See International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Hon. Harold Brown, et al, No. 79-1074 (D.D.C. Aug. 6, 1981), reprinted in J.A. at 114 [hereinafter cited as District Court Opinion]. … See Blaha v.

Cap Santa Vue, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

424 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1970

See also Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603-604 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961); Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 166-167 , 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878). This principle has been repeatedly applied. … See also Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516 , 65 S.Ct. 315 , 89 L.Ed. 430 (1945); West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943); People v.

Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 342 v. National Labor Relations Board

598 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1979

The dissent would accept the interpretation offered by counsel for the Board on appeal, and enforce the order as interpreted. This solution is said to derive from J. I. Case Co. v. … While we express no opinion on the appropriate unit on the facts of this case (an issue which “involves questions of fact and policy reserved for the Board,” Lewis v.

United States v. James Clayborne, United States of America v. William E. Brown, Jr.

509 F.2d 473 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1974

Davey, Clerk] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. … Nye & Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 619 , 69 S.Ct. 766 , 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949); United States v. Lumpkin, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 162, 167 , 448 F.2d 1085, 1090 (1971); United States v.

Great Lakes Chemical Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

967 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1992

The Board has broad authority in “devising remedies to effectuate the policies of the Act,” NLRB v. … Fairness to the Board and our own concern to avoid making an ill-informed decision counsel as much, as circuit practice attests. See, e.g., Town of Norwood v. FERC, 962 F.2d 20, 25 (D.C.Cir.1992); McBride v.

Centralia Building and Construction Trades Council v. National Labor Relations Board

363 F.2d 699 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1966

The order of the Board will be Enforced. 1 . 155 NLRB No. 80 (1965). 2 . National Labor Relations Act as amended, 73 Stat. 519 , 544. 3 . See Meat and Highway Drivers, Dockmen, etc. v. … Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. N.L.R.B., 117 U.S.App.D.C. 91, 95, 96 , 326 F.2d 634 , 638, 639 (1963).