Case law

Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. National Labor Relations Board

335 F.2d 709 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1964

We agree with Chairman McCulloch, joined by Member Brown, in dissenting from the opinion of the Board on this point: 10 'Deliveries to consignees in the Chicago area, regardless of origin, can justifiably be considered to … Drum, 368 U.S. 370 , 382 n. 26, 82 S.Ct. 408, 414 , 7 L.Ed.2d 360 (1962) Member Brown of the Board, who relied on Retail Clerks Union Local 770 v.

Cogburn Health Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

437 F.3d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 2006

The Board also issued a Gissel bargaining order, see NLRB v. … As we noted in Peoples Gas System, Inc. v.

Century Air Freight, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

679 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 1982

679 F.2d 261 220 U.S.App.D.C. 84 Century Air Freight, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board 81-2021 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 4/21/82 1 C.A.B.

Una Chapter, Flight Engineers' International Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

294 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1961

It should be noted, also, that in Leedom v. Kyne the National Labor Relations Board did not deny that it had contravened its governing statute. See 358 U.S. at page 187 , 79 S.Ct. at page 183 . … The purpose of the Board (and similarly of its designated committee) is to find facts. See Switchmen’s Union v. N. M. B., supra at page 301 of 320 U.S., at page 97 of 64 S.Ct.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

262 F.2d 456 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1958

In National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v.

Sol Tabor v. Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

566 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 1977

; Stanley v. … In response the Board first argued broadly that the recent Supreme Court decision in Wein-berger v.

Transportation Maintenance Services, L.L.C v. National Labor Relations Board

275 F.3d 112 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2002

Garvey Marine, Inc. v. … See Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v.

Donald Schriver, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

635 F.2d 859 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1980

Deference to the Board....................................886 V. THE SELF-ENFORCEMENT FEATURE OF THE AGREEMENTS .... 886 VI. … As stated in Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.

964 F.2d 1153 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1992

NLRB v. J.H. … But the Board is comparing apples and oranges. In none of the cases the Board cites did the employer attempt to bargain about the change before enacting it. See NLRB v.

Brewery Bev. Drivers, Etc. v. National Labor Relations Board

257 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 1958

We think it sufficient to say that in our view, on the facts of this case, the Board's conclusion appears arbitrary. Cf. Packard Motor Car Co. v. … R.B. 1199 3 The Union lost both of those elections 4 See National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 1939, 306 U.S. 292 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660 ; Zall v.

International Ass'n of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board

414 F.2d 1135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1969

Young’s Super Markets, Inc. v. NLRB, 377 F.2d 463, 466 (9th Cir. 1967). … The substantial nondiscriminatory change in personnel found by the Board, along with the changes in operational structure, negated any such presumption. See NLRB v.

Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

317 F.3d 316 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 2003

Agents, Inc. v. Hawke, 211 F.3d 638, 645 (D.C.Cir.2000) (citing Halverson v. Slater, 129 F.3d 180, 184-86 (D.C.Cir.1997)). The Board’s ambiguity argument therefore fails. B. … Printing Div. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. National Truck Rental Company, Inc.

239 F.2d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 1957

Relations Board v. … See Greene v. Bjorseth, 1932, 350 Ill. 469 , 183 N.E. 464, 472, 475 ; Kelly v. Brown, 1923, 310 Ill. 319 , 141 N.E. 743 , 747; Conley v. Hile, 1934, 207 Ind. 488 , 193 N.E. 95, 105 ; Frothingham v.

Patterson v. Subversive Activities Control Board

322 F.2d 395 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 1963

This is one of the cases referred to in Labor Youth League v. … We hold in California Labor School v.

Jefferson School of Social Science v. Subversive Activities Control Board

331 F.2d 76 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 17, 1963

This is another of the cases referred to in Labor Youth League v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 1 decided April 25, 1963. … Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1 , 81 S.Ct. 1357 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). . Southern Pacific Railroad v.

Western States Regional Council No. 3, International Woodworkers v. National Labor Relations Board

365 F.2d 934 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 1966

One week earlier the Supreme Court decided American Ship Building Co. v. NLRB, 380 U.S. 300 , 85 S.Ct. 955 , 13 L.Ed.2d 855 (1965), and NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). … , at least in those cases where the Board has not found the employers to have formed a multi-employer bargaining unit of the kind involved in Brown and Buffalo Linen. .

New York New York, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

313 F.3d 585 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 24, 2002

In Republic Aviation Corp. v. … The Eleventh Circuit enforced the Board’s order. Southern Services, Inc. v. NLRB, 954 F.2d 700 , 704 & n. 5 (11th Cir.1992).

Trump Marina Associates, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

435 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 2011

Finally, the Board’s conclusion Trump Marina Associates unlawfully interrogated an employee about his compliance with these rules, in violation of Section 8(a)(1), is not inconsistent with Board precedent and is supported … See Perdue Farms, Inc. v. NLRB, 144 F.3d 830, 834-36 (D.C.Cir.1998). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Southern New England Telephone Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

793 F.3d 93 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 2015

. *96 AT & T has filed a petition for review of the Board’s decision. We review the Board’s application of the law to the facts for reasonableness. See New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. … Guard Publishing Co. v. NLRB, 571 F.3d 53, 61 (D.C.Cir.2009).

National Labor Relations Board v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

438 F.3d 1198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 2006

FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d 96 , 99 n. 7 and 100 (D.C.Cir.1970); see also U.S. Inti Trade Comm’n v. ASAT, Inc., 411 F.3d 245 (D.C.Cir.2005); FTC v. MacArthur, 532 F.2d 1135 (7th Cir.1976). … See ASAT, 411 F.3d 245 ; La Rouche, 613 F.2d 849 ; Browning, 435 F.2d 96 ; see also FTC v. Cockrell, 431 F.Supp. 558 (D.D.C.1977) (cited approvingly in La Rouche, 613 F.2d at 855-56 ).