Case law

David B. Lilly Co., Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

495 F.2d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 1974

Lilly Co., Inc. v. Renegotiation Board 71-1025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 4/16/74 1 D.C.D.C. REMANDED (VACATING 466 F.2d 345 )

Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

193 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 23, 1951

193 F.2d 40 AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATES, Inc., petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, respondent. No. 10914. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Decided November 23, 1951. … Nunneley, Jr., General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, John H. Wanner, Associate General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, and Warren L. Sharfman, Attorney, Civil Aeronautics Board, all of Washington, D.

North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

241 F.2d 445 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 1957

Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served by our reviewing the Board’s finding in regard to “willingness”. Cf. Kuhn v. … North American Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 55 , 237 F.2d 209 , decided September 13, 1956.

White Sulphur Springs Company v. National Labor Relations Board

316 F.2d 410 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 1963

Holmes Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 179 F.2d 876, 879 (5 Cir., 1950). … B. v. Winchester Electronics, Incorporated, 2 Cir., 295 F.2d 288, 292 (1961); National Labor Relations Board v. L. Ronney & Sons Furniture Mfg.

North America Freight Car Ass'n v. Surface Transportation Board

529 F.3d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 2008

We defer to the Board’s interpretation as consistent with the statutory language. See W. Coal Traffic League v. … Gulf R.R. v.

Paul R. Rosen, Esq. v. National Labor Relations Board

735 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1984

See Ward v. … In Butz v.

Sierra Realty Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 494 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1996

NLRB v. Burns Int'l Security Servs., Inc., 406 U.S. 272, 294-95 , 92 S.Ct. 1571, 1585-86 , 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972). … The Board did not purport to overrule that decision or to qualify it in any way. Compare Daily News of Los Angeles v. NLRB, 979 F.2d 1571 , 1574-76 (D.C.Cir.1992), with Consolidated Freightways v.

Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Federal Maritime Board

304 F.2d 938 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1962

The Supreme Court indicated in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 225 U. … Continental Can Co. v. United States, 272 F.2d 312, 315 (2nd Cir.1959).

District of Columbia v. Tyrrell

41 App. D.C. 463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1914

Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App. D. C. 273, 282, 25 L.R.A.(N.S.) 98. … Maximilian v. New York, 62 N. Y. 160, 164 , 20 Am. Rep. 468 ; Brown v. District of Columbia, supra."

Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

162 F.3d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1998

Workers v. ICC, 862 F.2d 330 (D.C.Cir.1988)). Subject to these conditions, the Board approved Wisconsin Central’s acquisition of Union Pacific’s rail lines. … Taking up each argument in turn, we review the Board’s interpretation of the ICC Termination Act under Chevron’s two-step analysis. See Chevron U.S.A. v.

Freund Baking Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

165 F.3d 928 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1999

Eastex, Inc. v. … See Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB,  461 U.S. 731, 741 (1983). In support of this argument, the Board points to NAACP v.

Oberthur Technologies of America Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

865 F.3d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 2017

Servs. v. NLRB, 668 F.3d 758, 765 (D.C. … The Board is entitled to deference in the application of such factors. See generally Evergreen Am. Corp. v. NLRB, 362 F.3d 827, 837-838 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Seattle Opera v. NLRB, 292 F.3d 757, 761 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

497 F.2d 684 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1974

497 F.2d 684 162 U.S.App.D.C. 97 North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board 73-1404 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 6/20/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Air Transport Associates, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

193 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 23, 1951

The orders of the Civil Aeronautics Board are therefore Affirmed.

Ark Las Vegas Restaurant Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

334 F.3d 99 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 2003

McQuaide, Inc. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 47, 49 (D.C. Cir. 1998); Grondorf, Field, Black & Co. v. NLRB, 107 F.3d 882, 885 (D.C. Cir. 1997). … See Corson & Gruman Co. v. NLRB, 899 F.2d 47, 50 n.4 (D.C. Cir. 1990); C.J. Krehbiel Co. v. NLRB, 844 F.2d 880, 883 n.1 (D.C.

Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, CO v. EPA

72 F.4th 284 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2023

Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 280 (1994). In other words, “retroactive rules alter the past legal consequences of past actions.” Arkema, Inc. v. EPA, 618 F.3d 1, 7 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (quoting Bowen v. … Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682, 702 (1979); see also California v. Texas, 141 S.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

343 F.2d 329 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1965

Compare Local 833, UAW etc. v. NLRB, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 107 , 300 F.2d 699 , cert. denied, Kohler v. Local 833, etc., 370 U.S. 911 , 82 S.Ct. 1258 , 8 L.Ed.2d 405 (1962). … See Textile Workers Union of America v. Lincoln Mills, 353 U.S. 448 , 77 S.Ct. 912 , 1 L.Ed.2d 972 (1957), and United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO v. Warrior & Gulf Nav.

Land Air Delivery, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

862 F.2d 354 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1988

American Cyanamid v. … The Supreme Court has instructed that in framing its complaint, the Board is not limited to specific matters alleged in the charge, NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sagamore Shirt Co.

401 F.2d 925 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1968

As they were here first our decision is reported in Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. N.L.R.B. and N.L.R.B. v. Sagamore Shirt Co., 124 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 365 F.2d 898 . … Such activities furnished a permissible basis for a Board inference adverse to the Company’s good faith in refusing to recognize the Union. Joy Silk Mills v.

Norman F. Hecht, Harry Kagan, Marc A. Miller, Washington Federals, Inc., Etal. v. Pro-Football, Inc.

444 F.2d 931 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1971

The defendants relied upon Parker v. Brown, supra, Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 19 and United Mine Workers v. … Tears later the Fourth Circuit explained some of the limitations inherent in Parker v. Brown: The teaching of Parker v. Brown is that the antitrust laws are directed against individual and not state action.