Case law

Oberthur Technologies of America Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

865 F.3d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 2017

Servs. v. NLRB, 668 F.3d 758, 765 (D.C. … The Board is entitled to deference in the application of such factors. See generally Evergreen Am. Corp. v. NLRB, 362 F.3d 827, 837-838 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Seattle Opera v. NLRB, 292 F.3d 757, 761 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Casino Ready Mix, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.3d 1190 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 2003

The Board’s findings are fully supported by substantial evidence in the record and, therefore, command our deference. See Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951). … The Board’s judgment in Sunland Construction accords with the opinion issued by the Supreme Court three years later in NLRB v. Town & Country Electric, Inc., 516 U.S. 85 (1995).

Local Union No. 636 v. National Labor Relations Board

430 F.2d 906 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 1970

Manufacturers Ass'n v. … See also Danielson v. Painters District Council No. 20, etc., S.D.N.Y., 305 F.Supp. 1108, 1113-1117 (1969); Rotenberg v.

Hicks v. National Labor Relations Board

880 F.2d 1396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 1989

HICKS, d/b/a Ebon Research Systems, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3430, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. No. 88-1625. … We therefore remand the case to the Board, for further action either consistent with its existing precedents or for generation of a new jurisdictional rule. Compare NLRB v.

Camarda v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc.

672 F. App'x 28 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 2016

Bagley v. … Accordingly, the CFP Board’s cross-appeal was timely filed. As mootness is a question of law, see Gul v. Obama, 652 F.3d 12, 15 (D.C.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sagamore Shirt Co.

401 F.2d 925 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1968

As they were here first our decision is reported in Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. N.L.R.B. and N.L.R.B. v. Sagamore Shirt Co., 124 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 365 F.2d 898 . … Such activities furnished a permissible basis for a Board inference adverse to the Company’s good faith in refusing to recognize the Union. Joy Silk Mills v.

Air Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

663 F.3d 476 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 2011

See NLRB v. Cent. … See, e.g., FCC v.

District 50, United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Bowman Transportation, Inc.

237 F.2d 585 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 1956

We hold the Board does not have such authority. In United Mine Workers of America v. … District 50, United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board and Pittsburgh Valve Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 1956, 234 F.2d 565, 571 . .

Associated Milk Producers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

193 F.3d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 22, 1999

See NLRB v. … .”); NLRB v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

309 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1962

Nor was anything shown as was shown in Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. … We are advised that the Board’s Regulations have since been clarified. . WKAT, Inc. v. F. C. C., 111 U.S.App.D.C. 253, at 260 , 296 F.2d 375 , at 382. . Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v.

Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

855 F.3d 436 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 2017

Wayneview Care Ctr. v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Pirlott v. NLRB, 522 F.3d 423, 432 (D.C. Cir. 2008). … Edison Co. of N.Y. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 217 (1938); see also Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951).

Can-Am Plumbing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.3d 145 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 2003

Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, 244 (1959). In such instances, ‘‘due regard for the federal enactment requires that state jurisdiction must yield.’’ Id.; see also Brown v. Hotel & Rest. … NLRB v.

Marlin v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

236 F.3d 716 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 2001

Ass'n, 460 U.S. at 45 (citing Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461 (1980)). … Ass'n, 460 U.S. at 45 (citing Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461 (1980)).

National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

952 F.2d 523 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 7, 1992

Cook Paint & Varnish Co. v. … Workers v.

International Organization of Masters v. National Labor Relations Board

486 F.2d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 1973

National Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass’n v. NLRB, 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 167, 173 (1960). … See National Marine Engineers Beneficial Assn v. NLRB, 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 167 (1960).

National Labor Relations Board v. St. Barnabas Hospital

46 F. App'x 32 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 17, 2002

The National Labor Relations Board (Members Wilma B. Liebman, John C. Truesdale, and Dennis P. Walsh) adopted the findings and order of the ALJ. St. Barnabas Hospital v. … NLRB v. GAIU Local 13-B, 682 F.2d 304, 311 (2d Cir. 1982). The Board has adopted regulations requiring parties to set forth their exceptions in detail. 29 C.F.R. § 102.46 (b).

National Labor Relations Board v. The Madison Courier, Inc.

505 F.2d 391 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1974

For example, in NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Federal Maritime Board

304 F.2d 938 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1962

The Supreme Court indicated in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 225 U. … Continental Can Co. v. United States, 272 F.2d 312, 315 (2nd Cir.1959).

American Postal Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

370 F.3d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 2004

They were: Hardy, an MCOA driver; Brown, the president of APWU Local 32; and Grimes, an APWU organizer. … Discrimination The Union argues the Board’s decision is inconsistent with NLRB v.

North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

241 F.2d 445 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 1957

Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served by our reviewing the Board’s finding in regard to “willingness”. Cf. Kuhn v. … North American Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 55 , 237 F.2d 209 , decided September 13, 1956.