Case law

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

351 F.2d 778 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1965

We had reversed the Board’s order certifying Piedmont but concluded we had no authority to order the Board to certify State Airlines. State Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 374 , 174 F.2d 510 (1949). … And see State Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 374, 380 , 174 F.2d 510, 516 (1949), reversed on other grounds, 338 U.S. 572 , 70 S.Ct. 379 , 94 L.Ed. 353 (1950). . Securities and Exchange Comm’n v.

Canadian American Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1996

On questions regarding representation, we accord the Board an especially “wide degree of discretion.” NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 , 67 S.Ct. 324, 328 , 91 L.Ed. 322 (1946); see also C.J. Krehbiel Co. v. … Loewendick & Sons, Inc. v. Reich, 70 F.3d 1291, 1294 (D.C.Cir.1995) (quoting Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala, — U.S. —, —, 114 S.Ct. 2381, 2386 , 129 L.Ed.2d 405 (1994) (quoting Bowles v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

281 F.2d 53 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1960

The motion for production in the instant case was obviously intended to “probe the mental processes” of the Board (see United States v. … The Department refers to Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v.

Retail Store Employees Union v. National Labor Relations Board

627 F.2d 1133 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1979

The quoted words are from NLRB v. … Similarly, in American Bread Co. v.

International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

723 F.2d 963 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 1983

See, e.g., Windward Shipping, Ltd. v. American Radio Association, 415 U.S. 104 , 94 S.Ct. 959 , 39 L.Ed.2d 195 (1974); Incres Steamship Co. v. … ILA v. Allied International, Inc., 456 U.S. at 224-26 , 102 S.Ct. at 1663-64 (no exemption for “political” secondary boycott); see also Jacksonville Bulk Terminals v.

Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

605 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2015

The Board’s findings of section 8(a)(1) violations were supported by substantial evidence in the record, see United Mine Workers of Am., Dist. 31 v. … With respect to the séetion 8(a)(3) violations, the Board properly found, under its Wright Line test, see NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.

Phoenix Transit System v. National Labor Relations Board

63 F. App'x 524 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 2003

The Board has “considerable discretion in deciding whether to defer to an arbitration decision,” but must follow the standards of deference found in its own case law, American Freight Sys., Inc. v. … Austin, 418 U.S. 264 , 94 S.Ct. 2770 , 41 L.Ed.2d 745 (1974); Linn v.

Kwik Care Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1996

Krehbiel Co. v. NLRB, 844 F.2d 880, 882 (D.C.Cir.1988); J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 571 F.2d 850, 854 (5 Cir.1978); Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. NLRB, 424 F.2d 818 , 827 (D.C.Cir.1970). … See, e.g., NLRB v.

Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

219 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

Enloe seeks review of the Board’s order, arguing inter alia that the Board improperly failed to draw adverse inferences from the General Counsel’s refusal to make available for testimony the Board agents who supervised the … While the testimony of Board agents may be mandated when their participation is central to the case, see Drukker Commc’ns, Inc. v.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

502 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 1974

We conclude that the findings on which the Board rests its decision are adequately supported and that the result reached is a reasonable one. V. … National Aviation Trades Ass’n v.

Keokuk Junction Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

292 F.3d 884 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2002

Argued May 14, 2002 Decided June 14, 2002 No. 01-1305 Keokuk Junction Railway Co., Petitioner v. … We grant the petition because the BNSF has not received from the Board the certificate without which the Board lacks authority to order a crossing. I.

Local Union No. 636 v. National Labor Relations Board

430 F.2d 906 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 1970

Manufacturers Ass'n v. … See also Danielson v. Painters District Council No. 20, etc., S.D.N.Y., 305 F.Supp. 1108, 1113-1117 (1969); Rotenberg v.

Marquez Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

650 F. App'x 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2016

Again, petitioner never presented this issue to the Board. Relying on our decision in SSC Mystic Operating Co. v. NLRB, 801 F.3d 302, 308 (D.C. … In SW General, Inc. v. NLRB, 796 F.3d 67, 82 (D.C.

Boise Cascade Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

860 F.2d 471 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1988

Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB, 441 U.S. 488, 495-97 , 99 S.Ct. 1842, 1848-49 , 60 L.Ed.2d 420 (1979); Allied Chemical and Alkali Workers v. … V Three production unions, which have no members who are maintenance employees, assert that the Board erred in dismissing the complaint insofar as it relates to them. 18 The Board dismissed the union’s petition for review

Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

519 F.2d 944 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 22, 1975

Aug. 23, 1958, 72 Stat. 740 .) .See United States v. … Y. v. FPC (Texas Gulf Coast Area Rate Cases), 159 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 208-09 , 487 F.2d 1043, 1079-80 (1973), vacated and remanded sub nom. Shell Oil Co. v.

Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

208 F.3d 229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 2000

(citing NLRB v. … See, e. g., NLRB v.

Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

838 F.3d 16 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 30, 2016

BROWN, Circuit Judge: Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC (“Heartland”) successfully petitioned this Court to review an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board” or “NLRB”). … Corp. v.

Audrea Jones v. District of Columbia Armory Board

438 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1970

In Adderley v. … Women Strike for Peace v. Hickel, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 29 , 420 F.2d 597, 603 (1970).

Willamette Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

253 F.3d 720 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2001

Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 367 (1998). … Ctr. v. NLRB, 871 F.2d 137, 146-47 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

855 F.3d 436 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 2017

Wayneview Care Ctr. v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Pirlott v. NLRB, 522 F.3d 423, 432 (D.C. Cir. 2008). … Edison Co. of N.Y. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 217 (1938); see also Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951).