Case law

Winton v. National Transportation Safety Board

358 F. App'x 183 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 2009

This petition for review was considered on the record from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. … See Hinson v.

First Transit, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

22 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 2001

JUDGMENT This appeal was considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs filed by the par *4 ties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. … Because First Transit did not present to the National Labor Relations Board the arguments it now presents to the court, the court is without jurisdiction to consider First Transit’s arguments, as provided in § 10(e) of the

Teamsters Local 115 v. National Labor Relations Board

640 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 1981

Co. v. … B. v. Bush Hog, Inc., 405 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1968); N.L.R.B. v.

James E. Brown v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army

777 F.2d 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 1985

General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, 698 F.2d 516 , 526 & n. 57 (D.C.Cir.1983). … Schweiker v.

Peter J. Schweitzer, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

144 F.2d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1944

In a similar case construing National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 2 Cir., 1941, 121 F.2d 954, 957 . See National Labor Relations Board v.

Antelope Valley Bus Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

275 F.3d 1089 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2002

NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 (1946) (citing, e.g., Southern S.S. Co. v. … Ray McDermott & Co. v.

Citizens Investment Services Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

430 F.3d 1195 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 2005

McQuaide, Inc. v. … Dayton Typographic Serv. v. NLRB, 778 F.2d 1188, 1193 (6th Cir.1985). Here, the Board found such an inference.

Terrace Gardens Plaza, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

91 F.3d 222 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1996

Compare NLRB v. … See NLRB v.

McKinley v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

647 F.3d 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 2011

Reuss v. Balles, 584 F.2d 461, 462 (D.C. Cir. 1978). Two of the parts are relevant here—the Board and the Federal Reserve Banks (Reserve Banks). … See New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3, 20 (D.C.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

330 F.2d 853 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1964

In No. 18,068, the National Mediation Board appeals from an order issued by the District Court which, among other things, restrains the Board from conducting a representation election. … Mediation Board.

SFO Good-Nite Inn, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

700 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 20, 2012

NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 608 (1969). Notably, the Supreme Court has endorsed a conclusive presumption adopted by the Board in the context of union recognition. See Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. … NLRB v. Raytheon Co., 398 U.S. 25, 27 (1970) (quoting NLRB v. Mexia Textile Mills, 339 U.S. 563, 567 (1950)).

National Labor Relations Board v. Stant Lithograph, Inc.

297 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1961

The facts and circumstances are closely similar to those in Poole Foundry & Machine Co. v. … The present order of the Board will accordingly be Enforced.

Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

294 F.2d 217 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1961

Currey cites National Labor Relations Board v. Burns 25 and Donnelly Garment Co. v. National Labor Relations Board 26 in support of its position, but these cases are inapposite. … E. g., United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, supra note 5; American Airlines v.

DIC Entertainment, LP v. National Labor Relations Board

238 F.3d 434 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 2001

B B & L, Inc. v. NLRB, 52 F.3d 366, 369 (D.C. Cir. 1995). So long as the Board's decision is rational and in accord with past precedent, it will be upheld. Id. … B B & L, Inc. v. NLRB, 52 F.3d at 369.

Chritton v. National Transportation Safety Board

888 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1989

As the Board held in Administrator v. Christopherson, NTSB Order No. … Administrator v. Austin, 2 N.T.S.B. at 663-664. 45 The Board also correctly concluded that "[Mr.

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

351 F.2d 778 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1965

We had reversed the Board’s order certifying Piedmont but concluded we had no authority to order the Board to certify State Airlines. State Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 374 , 174 F.2d 510 (1949). … And see State Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 374, 380 , 174 F.2d 510, 516 (1949), reversed on other grounds, 338 U.S. 572 , 70 S.Ct. 379 , 94 L.Ed. 353 (1950). . Securities and Exchange Comm’n v.

Canadian American Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1996

On questions regarding representation, we accord the Board an especially “wide degree of discretion.” NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 , 67 S.Ct. 324, 328 , 91 L.Ed. 322 (1946); see also C.J. Krehbiel Co. v. … Loewendick & Sons, Inc. v. Reich, 70 F.3d 1291, 1294 (D.C.Cir.1995) (quoting Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala, — U.S. —, —, 114 S.Ct. 2381, 2386 , 129 L.Ed.2d 405 (1994) (quoting Bowles v.

Phoenix Transit System v. National Labor Relations Board

63 F. App'x 524 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 2003

The Board has “considerable discretion in deciding whether to defer to an arbitration decision,” but must follow the standards of deference found in its own case law, American Freight Sys., Inc. v. … Austin, 418 U.S. 264 , 94 S.Ct. 2770 , 41 L.Ed.2d 745 (1974); Linn v.

Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

219 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

Enloe seeks review of the Board’s order, arguing inter alia that the Board improperly failed to draw adverse inferences from the General Counsel’s refusal to make available for testimony the Board agents who supervised the … While the testimony of Board agents may be mandated when their participation is central to the case, see Drukker Commc’ns, Inc. v.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

502 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 1974

We conclude that the findings on which the Board rests its decision are adequately supported and that the result reached is a reasonable one. V. … National Aviation Trades Ass’n v.