Case law

Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Civil Aeronautics Board

494 F.2d 1156 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1974

494 F.2d 1156 161 U.S.App.D.C. 237 Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Civil Aeronautics Board 73-1076, 73-1680 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 3/15/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole

210 F. App'x 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 22, 2006

Parole Board’s policy or custom. Furthermore, to the extent appellant is suing the former Chairperson of the D.C. … Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 166 , 105 S.Ct. 3099 , 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985). See Simpkins v.

Citizens Investment Services Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

430 F.3d 1195 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 2005

McQuaide, Inc. v. … Dayton Typographic Serv. v. NLRB, 778 F.2d 1188, 1193 (6th Cir.1985). Here, the Board found such an inference.

Facchina Constraction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

180 F. App'x 178 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2006

. & Furniture Workers v. NLRB, 41 F.3d 1532 , 1536 (D.C.Cir.1994). … ‘We owe substantial deference to inferences drawn from the facts, to choices of remedies, and, overall, to the reasoned exercise of the Board’s expert judgment.” Avecor, Inc. v.

The Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

350 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 1965

C. v. Baltimore & O. Ry., 145 U.S. 263 , 281, 12 S.Ct. 844 , 36 L.Ed. 699 (1892). … Ry. v. Tennessee, 262 U.S. 318 , 43 S.Ct. 583 , 67 L.Ed. 999 (1923).

Nordstrom v. National Labor Relations Board.

984 F.2d 479 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 1993

NLRB v. Brown & Root, 311 F.2d 447, 454 (8th Cir.1963). … See NLRB v.

Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

345 F.2d 445 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 18, 1965

See American Air lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 7 Cir., 178 F.2d 903 (1949). . Railway Express Agency, Grandfather Certificate, 2 C.A.B. 531, 536 (1941). See also Consolidated Flower Shipments-Bay Area v. … Corp. v. Civil Aero. Bd., 90 U.S.App.D.C. 330, 331-332 , 197 F.2d 384, 385-386 (1952); American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, supra Note 7; Intra-Mar Ship *449 ping, Enforcement Proceeding, 27 C.A.B. 568 (1958).

Sunglass Products Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

165 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 2005

This cause was considered on a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board” or “NLRB”) and was briefed and argued by counsel. … It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by this Court, that the petition for review is hereby denied, and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement is granted substantially for the reasons given by the Board in the decision under

Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

609 F. App'x 656 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2015

Tasty Baking Co. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 114, 124 (D.C.Cir.2001) (citing Avecor, Inc. v. NLRB, 931 F.2d 924, 931 (D.C.Cir.1991)). Substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that OHL engaged in such conduct. … See Perdue Farms, Inc., Cookin’ Good Div. v. NLRB, 144 F.3d 830, 835 (D.C.Cir.1998). The record also supports the Board’s conclusion that OHL threatened employees with loss of benefits if they voted to unionize.

Hayes v. Chairman, United States Board of Parole

492 F.2d 669 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1974

492 F.2d 669 160 U.S.App.D.C. 403 Hayes v. Chairman, United States Board of Parole 73-1843 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 2/4/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Overseas National Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

307 F.2d 634 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1962

See New York Central Railroad Co. v. Lockwood, 17 Wall. 357 , 84 U.S. 357, 377 , 21 L.Ed. 627 (1873); Pacific Northwestern Airlines v. Alaska Airlines, 80 F.Supp. 592 , 12 Alaska 65 (D.C.Alaska, 1948). … See United States v. Drum, 368 U.S. 370 , 82 S.Ct. 408 , 7 L.Ed.2d 360 (1962); Fleming v. Chicago Cartage Co., 160 F.2d 992 (7th Cir.1947). United States v.

Grondorf, Field, Black & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

107 F.3d 882 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 1997

Workers v. NLRB, 980 F.2d 774 , 778 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1992) (findings not challenged before the Board are entitled to summary enforcement). … Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp. v. NLRB, 942 F.2d 151 , 160 (2d Cir.1991); see NLRB v. Katz’s Delicatessen, 80 F.3d 755 (2d Cir.1996); Ron Tirapelli Ford, Inc. v. NLRB, 987 F.2d 433 (7th Cir. 1993).

Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

294 F.2d 217 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1961

Currey cites National Labor Relations Board v. Burns 25 and Donnelly Garment Co. v. National Labor Relations Board 26 in support of its position, but these cases are inapposite. … E. g., United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, supra note 5; American Airlines v.

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board

29 F.3d 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1994

Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1718 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). 57 Unable to link its assertion of authority to any statutory provision, the Board's position in this case amounts to the bare suggestion that it possesses … National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943), and Leedom v.

EPI Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

324 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 2009

See NLRB v. … Pacific Micronesia Corp. v.

Trump Ruffin Commercial, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

689 F. App'x 638 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 2016

Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

237 F.3d 639 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 2000

Edison Co. v. … In Rios v.

Somerset Welding & Steel, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

987 F.2d 777 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1993

In NLRB v. … Finally, we cannot enforce the bargaining order remedy because no reasoned justification therefor appears in the Board’s order. In Peoples Gas Sys., Inc. v.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

527 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1975

order guidelines established in NLRB v. … See, e. g., NLRB v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals, 473 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1973); NLRB v. WKRG-TV, Inc., 470 F.2d 1302 (5th Cir. 1973).

City of Newport Beach v. Civil Aeronautics Board

665 F.2d 1280 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1981

See, e. g., Romero-Barcelo v. Brown, 643 F.2d 835, 862 (1st Cir. 1981). Judgment accordingly. During the course of these proceedings the Orange County Airport was named John Wayne Airport. … “[A]n impact statement should not be required where the impact will be minor or unimportant, or where ‘there is no sensible reason for making one’ .... ” Hanly v.