Case law

Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

347 F.3d 955 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 2003

See NLRB v. Truitt Mfg. Co., 351 U.S. 149, 152-53 (1956). … See, e.g., Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc. v.

Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

161 F.3d 58 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 17, 1998

See New York Dock Ry. v. … Given the conflicting positions, it was up to the Board to decide where to draw the line, and it did so rationally. See FCC v.

Wilkes-Barre Hospital Co., LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

857 F.3d 364 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2017

Relevant to this case, we previously suggested that “a properly constituted Board” could ratify the decisions of an improperly constituted Board. See Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. … Federal courts, not the Board, are the primary source of authority in interpreting collective bargaining agreements. Litton Fin. Printing Div. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190, 202–03 (1991); Enloe Med. Ctr. v.

San Miguel Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

697 F.3d 1181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 2012

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge, EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. … Its promulgation in 1989 was a notable event in which the Board responded to differing positions taken by the Board and courts of appeals. See generally St. Margaret Mem’l Hosp. v.

Kwik Care Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1996

Krehbiel Co. v. NLRB, 844 F.2d 880, 882 (D.C.Cir.1988); J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 571 F.2d 850, 854 (5 Cir.1978); Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. … See, e.g., NLRB v.

George J. Geiger v. Harold Brown, Secretary of the Air Force

419 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 1969

See Murray v. United States, 154 Ct.Cl. 185 (1961). 4 . The functions of this Board at the time were defined in AFR 35-16, see note 10 infra. 5 . … See also Birt v. United States, 180 Ct. C1. 910 (1967). 8 . The Government relies solely on Bailey v.

Action on Smoking & Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board

699 F.2d 1209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1983

Continental Air Lines v. CAB, 522 F.2d 107 , 116 (D.C.Cir.1974). . See Diefenthal v. CAB, 681 F.2d 1039 (5th Cir.1982); Continental Air Lines v. … Batterton v. Marshall, 648 F.2d 694, 709 (D.C.Cir.1980); see, e.g., Pickus v. United States Bd. of Parole, 507 F.2d 1107 (D.C.Cir.1974); Lewis-Mota v. Sec’y of Labor, 469 F.2d 478 (2d Cir.1972). .

Sears, Roebuck And Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

473 F.2d 91 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1973

Bannercraft Clothing Co., Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board, 151 U.S.App.D.C. 174 , 466 F.2d 345 (decided July 6, 1972). … While Myers v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Central Dispensary & Emergency Hospital

145 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 1944

See Great Southern Trucking Co. v. Labor Board, 4 Cir., 139 F.2d 984, 987 . … See National Labor Relations Board v. Appalachian Power Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 217, 220-222 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Botany Worsted Mills, 3 Cir., 133 F.2d 876, 881, 882 .

Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations Board

793 F.3d 85 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 2015

See Venetian Casino Resort, LLC v. Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, 257 F.3d 937, 939 (9th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 905 (2002). … The Board, in its 2005 Decision and Order, affirmed the ALJ’s decision. See id. On appeal, we affirmed the Board’s 2005 Decision and Order on all but one issue. See Venetian Casino Resort, LLC v.

American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board

103 F.2d 933 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 1939

And in Shields v. … IV), sec. 151 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. 2 gee particularly Consolidated Edison Co., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, et al., and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, et al. v.

Parsippany Hotel Management Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

99 F.3d 413 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1996

The purpose of Section 10(b) is “to prevent the issuance by the Board of complaints upon charges based upon stale unfair labor practices.” N.L.R.B. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 203 F.2d 139, 146 (8th Cir.1953); N.L.R.B. v. … Co. v.

E. Anthony & Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

163 F.2d 22 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1947

See National Labor Relations Board v. Willard, Inc., 1938, 68 App.D.C. 372 , 98 F.2d 244 ; National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash & O. … National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Corporation, 1939, 306 U.S. 240 , 59 S.Ct. 490 , 83 L.Ed. 627 , 123 A.L.R. 599 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

306 F.3d 1108 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 8, 2002

In Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board, 237 F.3d 676 (D.C.Cir.2001) (AAR v. … The AAR disagreed and sought review of the Board’s decision. In AAR v.

Thomas M. Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

863 F.2d 59 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1988

Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Civil Action No. 87-01682, slip op. at 2 (D.D.C. … Gaubert v. General Home Loan Bank Board, Civil Action No. 87-01682, Order at 2 (D.D.C. Feb. 12, 1988).

McDonald Partners, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

331 F.3d 1002 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 2003

This case was pending at the time of the Board’s Levitz decision and, under Levitz, the reasonable doubt standard therefore applied. Id. at *18 ; see, e.g., Marion Hosp. Corp. v. … We disagree with the Board’s interpretation of Auciello, an interpretation to which we owe no deference, New York New York v. NLRB, 313 F.3d 585, 590 (D.C.Cir.2002).

Laborers' District Council v. National Labor Relations Board

501 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1974

F. of L. v. NLRB, 308 U.S. 401, 410 , 60 S.Ct. 300, 304 , 84 L.Ed. 347 (1940). The Board has been entrusted with complete control of election proceedings. Excelsior Laundry v. NLRB, 409 F.2d 70 (10th Cir. 1968). … There is a broad presumption in favor of the remedy chosen by the Board. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 177 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 845 (1941); NLRB v. Rutter Rex Mfg.

Deferiet Paper Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

235 F.3d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 2000

Deferiet tells us that this precedent, which the Board invoked here, conflicts with a dictum in NLRB v. … In determining whether a unit is appropriate, the Board exercises wide discretion. Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 (1947).

The State of Georgia v. The Honorable John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States

450 F.2d 1317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 1971

County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968); Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). Ever since Brown v. … and a year later Brown II held must be abolished; school boards operating such school systems were required by Brown II ‘to effectuate a transition to a racially nondiscriminatory school system.’ 349 U.S., at 301 , 75 S.Ct

Knu-Vise, Inc. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

195 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1952

The War Contracts Price Adjustment Board determined that petitioner realized excessive profits of $80,0.00 for 1943 and of $35,000 for 1944. … Electrical Motors v. Jones, 1946, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 153 F.2d 134 ; Lowell Wool By-Products Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. —, 192 F.2d 405 . 2 . Sec.