Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.27s
National Labor Relations Board v. The Madison Courier, Inc.
472 F.2d 1307 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1972
N.L.R.B. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (8th Cir. 1963). See N.L.R.B. v. Ellis & Watts Products, Inc., 344 F.2d 67, 69 (6th Cir. 1965); N.L.R.B. v. … B. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (8th Cir. 1963), he usually goes further, pursuant to the N. L. R.
Cited 109 timesPublishedBoard of Directors of City Trusts v. Maloney
141 F.2d 275 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1944
“Should the estate in the future, allow enough for an additional student, the Board of City Trust is authorized to extend the benefaction at their discretion. … D.C. 73, 74 , 111 F.2d 514, 515 ; Walker v. Thomas, 64 App.D.C. 148, 149, 150 , 75 F.2d 667, 668, 669 , 99 A.L.R. 713 . Greenwood v. Page, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 166 , 138 F.2d 921, 924 , and authorities there cited. Ould v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMcGraw-Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
533 F.2d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 19, 1976
MacKINNON, Circuit Judge: At issue here is a petition for review and a cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board which directs petitioner McGraw-Edison Co. to cease and desist from … The revision of the first part of the Board’s order which appears in the margin 8 would meet the objection we have to its form. Judgment accordingly. 1 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedDurham School Services, LP v. National Labor Relations Board
821 F.3d 52 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 2016
Co. v. NLRB, 99 F.3d 413, 417 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Int’l Union of Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 418 F.2d 1191, 1195 n.10 (D.C. Cir. 1969). … See, e.g., NLRB v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFerriso v. National Labor Relations Board
125 F.3d 865 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 19, 1997
In Abrams v. … See Gwirtz v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown, Ronald L. v. Wheat First Sec
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2001
Brown, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. … We assume in Brown's favor that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph, 121 S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
302 F.2d 186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 8, 1962
Phelps Dodge Corp. *190 v. N. L. R. B., 313 U.S. 177, 186-187 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 (1941); Piasecki Aircraft Co. v. N. L. R. … B. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRollen F. Stewart v. District of Columbia Armory Board
863 F.2d 1013 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 1988
In Cornelius v. … In Lehman v.
Cited 48 timesPublishedAssociation of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board
237 F.3d 676 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 2001
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Board’s determination. See Western Coal Traffic League v. … (quoting Association of American Railroads v. Costie, 562 F.2d 1310 , 1316 (D.C.Cir.1977)); see also Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSitka Sound Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
206 F.3d 1175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 2000
Board of Regents of University of Washington v. EPA, 86 F.3d 1214, 1221 (1996) (citations omitted). So we hold again.* B. … Co. v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedVico Products Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
333 F.3d 198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2003
The Board’s ‘‘clear and unmistakable’’ rule as explained in Metropolitan Edison Co. v. … , Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDelta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
275 F.2d 632 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 1959
The Board denies the applicability of Ashbacker in this latter situation and refers us to Pauley v. … required by Delta Air Lines v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDenver S. Cooper v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
24 F.3d 1414 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1994
Railroad Retirement Board, 977 F.2d 647 (D.C.Cir.1992) (“Cooper I ”); 2) In re Cooper, No. 93-1102, 1993 WL 71714 (D.C.Cir. Mar. 3, 1993) (petition for mandamus); 3) proceedings on remand to the Board; and 4) Cooper v. … See Sullivan v.
Cited 70 timesPublishedRailway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board
38 F.3d 1224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 1994
38 F.3d 1224 309 U.S.App.D.C. 36 RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, Appellee. Nos. 91-5223, 91-5310. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJohn Daniel Brown v. Dale C. Cameron, Superintendent, St. Elizabeths Hospital
353 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 1965
Cited 13 timesPublishedNorth Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
281 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1960
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co., 288 U.S. 14, 84 , 53 S.Ct. 266, 272 , 77 L.Ed. 588 . … United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 7 Cir., 198 F.2d 100, 105, 106 ; Western Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 9 Cir., 196 F.2d 933 . .
Cited 1 timesPublishedManhattan Center Studios, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
452 F.3d 813 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 2006
We review the Board’s order to determine “whether the Board acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying established law to the facts of the case.” Antelope Valley Bus Co., Inc. v. … See Comprehensive Care Corp. v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedBartel v. National Transportation Safety Board
528 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 2013
See Schwartz v. Helms, 712 F.2d 633 (D.C.Cir.1983). … Moreover, the Board’s decision to dismiss Bartel’s petition under the doctrine of res judicata was not “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” See Dickson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGoya Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
309 F. App'x 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 2009
This cause was considered on a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) and was briefed and argued by counsel. … It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by this Court, that the petition for review is hereby denied, and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement is granted essentially for the reasons stated by the Board. Pursuant to D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAir Line Pilots Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board
458 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1972
Ill American Airlines v. CAB, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 348 , 235 F.2d 845 (1956), cert. denied, Air Coach Transport Ass’n v. … Western Air Lines v. CAB, 122 U.S.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna