Case law

Brown v. Wells

45 App. D.C. 428 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1916

Crenshaw v. McCormick, 19 App. D. C. 494. … Galloway v. Galloway, 32 App. D. C. 77; Taylor v. Leesnitzer, 37 App. D. C. 356; and English v. Cooper, 183 Ill. 203 , 55 N. E. 687 .

Brown v. United States

63 F.2d 136 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 1933

Appellant, defendant below, Benjamin Brown, was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to death. From this judgment defendant appeals. … In the case of Eagles v. United States, 58 App. D.

United States v. Dawayne Brown

892 F.3d 385 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 2018

See, e.g. , United States v. Brown , 808 F.3d 865 , 867, 872 (D.C. Cir. 2015) ; United States v. Akhigbe , 642 F.3d 1078 , 1086 (D.C. Cir. 2011) ; In re Sealed Case , 527 F.3d at 191-192 . Today marks the fourth time. … Hughes v.

Brown v. Barter

701 F.2d 221 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1983

701 F.2d 221 226 U.S.App.D.C. 210 Brown v. Barter 81-2272 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 1/6/83 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Kemp v. Brown

652 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1981

652 F.2d 196 209 U.S.App.D.C. 203 Kemp v. Brown 79-2487 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 3/6/81 1 D.C.D.C. REVERSED AND REMANDED

Mann v. Brown

43 App. D.C. 457 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 19, 1915

Brown, which issued during the pendency of Mann’s application. Evidence was taken and Brown moved to dissolve the interference. There were six claims involved. … Gold v. Gold, 34 App. D. C. 229, 236, 238; Moore *462 v. United States, 40 App. D. C. 201; Rotter v. Hodgkinson, present term \_ante, 254].

Brown v. Alexander

615 F.2d 1368 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 13, 1980

615 F.2d 1368 199 U.S.App.D.C. 9 Brown v. Alexander No. 79-1129 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/13/80 1 D.C.D.C. 2 VACATED AND REMANDED ***

Traver v. Brown

14 App. D.C. 34 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1899

That court sustained his claim that the Brown device was an infringement of Patent No. 431,957; but its decision was subsequently reversed on appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals. Brown v. Traver, 70 Fed. Rep. 810. … C. 497, 499, 501, or that of Wurts v. Harrington, 10 App. D. C. 149, 155, *42 both of which have been cited on behalf of appellant.

Franklin v. Brown

593 F.2d 1371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 1979

593 F.2d 1371 193 U.S.App.D.C. 217 Franklin v. Brown No. 78-1115 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/22/79 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Kemp v. Brown

589 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 1978

589 F.2d 733 191 U.S.App.D.C. 210 Kemp v. Brown No. 77-1476 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 10/23/78 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED *

Brown v. McIntire

7 App. D.C. 435 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1896

No receipt for this rent by Barbara Brown has been produced or accounted for. … Peugh, trustee, and Barbara Brown to Edwin A. Mclntire, trustee.

Bradford v. Brown

22 App. D.C. 455 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1903

Brown against the appellant James T. Bradford, who is a nonresident of the District of Columbia, and which attachment was levied upon certain real estate of the appellant situate in this District. … Brown with the defendants Leonard C. Bailey, John A. Pierre, Win-field S. Montgomery, and J ames T.

Huntington v. Brown

277 F. 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1922

Huntington was in the employ of the Majestic Electric Development Company, of which Brown was a director. The' case turns solely upon the question of originality. … Upon the issue of fact thus involved, priority was awarded to Brown by the Board of Examiners in Chief and by the Commissioner.

Brown v. Blood

22 App. D.C. 216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1903

The appellant, Henry Brown, is the senior party, having filed his application on August 28, 1900, upon which a patent issued February 26, 1901. … The rule of Mason v. Hepburn is a strict one, and we have several times had occasion to say that it will not be extended to any case not falling clearly within it. McBerty v. Cook, 16 App. D. C. 133, 139; Esty v.

Brown v. Hight

33 App. D.C. 260 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1909

The defendant Brown and the intervener Mercer in their answers tender themselves as ready and willing to pay said sum upon the order of the court, and we think it was *268 error for the trial court not to direct complainant

Coe v. Brown

44 App. D.C. 455 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1916

Brown, on the following counts: “1.

Brown v. Hardy

510 F.2d 223 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1975

510 F.2d 223 166 U.S.App.D.C. 270 Brown v. Hardy No. 74-1430 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/28/75 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Stephanie Brown v. Allen Sessoms

774 F.3d 1016 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2014

Dissatisfied, Brown sued the Board of Trustees of UDC (Board) and Sessoms (collectively, UDC defendants). She alleged one federal claim and six local-law claims. … This language makes clear that the Board is not required to review Brown’s tenure application.

United States v. Brown

504 F.3d 99 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 2007

As additional support for this argument, Brown cites Bartak v. … Brown cites two Eleventh Circuit cases as support for his argument. In United States v.

ITT Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

251 F.3d 995 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 2001

NLRB v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105, 112 (1956); see also Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, 502 U.S. 527, 534 (1992); Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hosp. at Stanford v. NLRB, 97 F.3d 583, 587 (D.C. Cir. 1996). … of the hospital"); NLRB v.