Case law

Valentini v. Shinseki

860 F. Supp. 2d 1079 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 2012

Story acknowledges that the Library of Congress Trust Fund Board was authorized to accept donations in trust. Story, 184 F.2d at 455 . And in United States v. … See, e.g., Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 974 (6th Cir.1997). In the absence of controlling authority from the United States Supreme Court or the Ninth Circuit, the Court is convinced by the reasoning in Broudy . .

Brown v. Ruckelshaus

364 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 7, 1973

If sustained on the merits, Congressman Brown and Los Angeles would fall within the exception we note here. Campaign Clean Water v. Ruckelshaus, 361 F.Supp. 689 (E.D.Va.1973); City of New York v. … Gravel v. Laird, 347 F.Supp. 7, 9 (D.C.D.C.1972); cf. Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346 , 31 S.Ct. 250 , 55 L.Ed. 246 (1911). Congressman Brown’s class action allegation also must fail.

Brown v. Rison

673 F. Supp. 1505 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 25, 1987

Finnerty v. Cowen, 508 F.2d 979, 982-83 (2nd Cir.1974); Green v. Nelson, 442 F.Supp. 1047, 1052 (D.Conn.1977). … Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. at 94 n. 1, 99 S.Ct. at 941 n. 1. 6 .

Sigmond v. Brown

645 F. Supp. 243 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 15, 1986

Plaintiff claims that by filing the complaint, Shearer intended to influence the Board so that it would revoke plaintiff’s license. The Board eventually dismissed the complaint against plaintiff. … Enterprise In United States v.

Rising v. Brown

313 F. Supp. 824 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 1, 1970

Plaintiff John V. Tunney and defendant George E. Brown, Jr. are congressmen from near adjoining .districts in California. … They rely upon Massachusetts v. Mellon, Frothingham v.

Brown v. Vasquez

743 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 1990

People v. Brown, 46 Cal.3d 432 , 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1059 , 109 S.Ct. 1329 , 103 L.Ed.2d 597 (1989). … People v. Brown, 46 Cal.3d at 446-48 , 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 .

Nichols v. Brown

859 F. Supp. 2d 1118 · District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 2012

(Brown MTD at 8); see also Cal. Const., Art. V, sec. 1 (“The Governor shall see that the law is faithfully executed.”). … Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Brown, 124 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir.1997).

Nichols v. Brown

945 F. Supp. 2d 1079 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 3, 2013

Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. Brown, 124 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir.1997). … V.

Brown v. Grove

647 F. Supp. 2d 1178 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 16, 2009

See Jones v. … See Moore v.

Collier v. Brown

635 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 20, 2009

See Barry v. Ratelle, 985 F.Supp. 1235, 1237-38 (S.D.Cal.1997); see Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d at 934, 937-38 (under Booth v. … See Wood-ford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. at 83-94 , 126 S.Ct. 2378 . Therefore, Defendants Brown, Gibbons and LaCuesta are entitled to summary judgment. II.

Jarvis v. Brown

347 F. Supp. 1214 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 1972

Zwickler v. … Further, in Smith v.

Brown v. Yates

753 F. Supp. 2d 1069 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 2010

.’"); Stanley v. … [Pet.]: Alan Brown. [Morris]: Is that what you've been drinking, is a Miller Lite? [Pet.]: Miller Lite. [Morris]: Where at? [Pet.]: Bar. [Morris]: Bar, which bar?

Brown v. United States

403 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 23, 1975

United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 767 , 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941); Mitchell v. Riddell, 402 F.2d 842, 846 (9th Cir., 1968), cert. den., 394 U.S. 456 , 89 S.Ct. 1223 , 22 L.Ed.2d 415 (1969); Caton v. … In City of New York v.

Brown v. Federal Express Corp.

249 F.R.D. 580 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 26, 2008

Brown in Opp’n to Mot. for Class Certification (“Brown Decl.”) 113.) … (Brown Decl. 1f 12.) B.

Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

722 F. Supp. 2d 1148 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 13, 2010

Entm’t 2000, Inc. v. … .’ ” Verizon Del., Inc. v.

Brown v. American Airlines, Inc.

285 F.R.D. 546 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2011

In Cortez v. … See, e.g., Arena Depo., 80:3-9; 81:12-82:2; Figuroa Decl. ¶ 10; Watkins Deck ¶ 10; Sanzo-Davis Deck ¶ 11; Tiffany Deck ¶ 8; Brown Depo., 133:15-18; Holland Deck ¶ 11; Watkins Deck ¶ 11; Brown Depo., 132:9-133:5; Yammine Deck

Brown v. China Integrated Energy, Inc.

285 F.R.D. 560 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 17, 2012

See Brockmeyer v. … See Khachatryan v.

Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC

152 F. Supp. 3d 1243 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 22, 2016

The Fifth Circuit disagreed with the Board’s finding that the class action waiver in the arbitration agreement violated the NLRA. See also Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. … Concrete Prods. v. General Truck Drivers, Office, Food & Warehouse Union, Local 952, 353 F.3d 668, 678 (9th Cir.2003) (sympathy strike to support workers engaged in primary strike); Brown & Root, Inc. v.

Brown v. NFL Players Ass'n

281 F.R.D. 437 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2012

INTRODUCTION On December 9, 2011, Ronald Brown (“Brown”), Charles Detwiler (“Detwiler”), and Dwight Hicks (“Hicks”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against the National Football League Players Association (“ … Regardless of Brown’s or Hicks’s status as NFLPA members, Defendants do not contend that Detwiler is not a member of the proposed class or that his claims are atypical. See, e.g., Smith v. Cardinal Logistics Mgmt.

Brown v. County of San Bernardino

250 F. Supp. 3d 568 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2017

WHEN DEPUTIES ASKED BROWN WHAT HER NAME WAS SHE REFUSED TO GIVE HER NAME MULT TIMES AND SAID FUCK YOU. DO [sic] TO BROWN BEING A PRIOR UB SHE COULDN’T BE BOOKED INTO BB JAIL AND WAS TAKEN TO WVDC. … BROWN TRIED TO KICK OUT THE WINDOW IN THE UNIT SO SHE WAS HOBLED [sic], BROWN WAS COMBATIVE AND WVDC WAS ADVISED. BROWN REFUSED TO SIGN HER CITATION SO I COMPLETED A PC DEC FOR HER.