Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

0.34s

  • Reed v. Gardner

    261 F. Supp. 87 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 1966

    In the case of Short v. … See Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U.S. 118, 136 [ 63 S.Ct. 1333, 1342 , 87 L.Ed. 1796 ]; Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners [of State of N. M.], 353 U.S. 232, 246 [ 77 S.Ct 752, 760 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 ].

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gherebi v. Bush

    262 F. Supp. 2d 1064 · District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2003

    Al Odah v. United States In Al Odah v. … See Vermilyar-Brown Co. v. Connell, 335 U.S. 377, 390 , 69 S.Ct. 140 , 93 L.Ed. 76 (1948) (recognizing distinction between “sole power” and “sovereignty”); Cuban Am. Bar Ass’n, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Practice Management Information Corp. v. American Medical Ass'n

    877 F. Supp. 1394 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 8, 1994

    Doran v. Salem, Inn, Inc., 422 U.S. 922, 931 , 95 S.Ct. 2561, 2567-68 , 45 L.Ed.2d 648 (1975); Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Phoenix Control Syst., Inc., 886 F.2d 1173 , 1174 (9th Cir. 1989). … Order re the AMA’s Motion for Summary Judgment, at p. 14-15, citing the Declaration of Judith .Brown, ¶¶ 6-8.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trevino v. Gates

    798 F. Supp. 621 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 7, 1992

    Defendants cite several cases in which legislators were held entitled to legislative immunity with respect to their votes, e.g., Kuzinich v. County of Santa Clara, 689 F.2d 1345 (9th Cir.1982); Brown v. … Yakus v. United Stated, 321 U.S. 414, 424 , 64 S.Ct. 660, 667 , 88 L.Ed. 834 (1944) (citation omitted). Cinevision Corp. v. City of Burbank, 745 F.2d 560, 580 (9th Cir.1984).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rea v. Gower

    47 F. Supp. 3d 1026 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 19, 2014

    See Boyde v. Brown, 404 F.3d 1159, 1172-73 (9th Cir.) (admission of evidence didn’t violate due process when “jury could draw permissible inference” from it), amended on other grounds by 421 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir.2005). … The Supreme Court granted certiorari in McDaniel v. Brown, 558 U.S. 120 , 130 S.Ct. 665 , 175 L.Ed.2d 582 (2010), a habeas case involving a due process challenge to supposedly unreliable testimony from a DNA expert.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • John Mitchell v. Scott Wilkinson

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 13, 2019

    (See, generally, Twana Brown v. Scott Wilkinson, et al., Case No. CV 19-5568 FMO (AGRx) (C.D. Cal.) (“Brown”), Dkt. 1, “Brown Complaint’; Haitham Saeed v. Scott Wilkinson, et al., Case No. … Huene v. United States, 743 F.2d 703, 704 (9th Cir. 1984). “A district court generally has ‘broad’ discretion to consolidate actions[.]” Pierce v. Cty. of Orange, 526 F.3d 1190, 1203 (9th Cir. 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Adams v. Howerton

    486 F. Supp. 1119 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 25, 1980

    The only Circuit Court case we have found is On v. Brownell, 253 F.2d 814 (5th Cir. 1958), but there are a number of Board of Immigration appeals decisions to the same effect. … Among them are: Anonymous v. Anonymous, 67 Misc.2d 982 , 325 N.Y.S.2d 499 (1971); Baker v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Walt Disney Productions v. Filmation Associates

    628 F. Supp. 871 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 20, 1986

    Berkic v. … See Zacchini v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Moulder Bros.

    717 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 25, 1989

    Dariano & Sons, Inc. v. District Council of Painters No. 33, 869 F.2d 514, 517 (9th Cir.1989); Carpenters Local Union No. 1478 v. … See Waggoner v. *700 Dallaire, 649 F.2d 1362, 1369 (9th Cir.1981).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Orantes-Hernandez v. Holder

    713 F. Supp. 2d 929 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2010

    Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 604 , 121 S.Ct. 1835 , 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001); Miles v. … Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Donald W. Park v. United States

    District Court, C.D. California · Jun 27, 2024

    (“Board”). … Here, the relevant procedures permit the Board to deny an application without holding a hearing. See 32 C.F.R. §§ 723.3(e)(1), (3); see also Mahoney v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Air Crash in Bali, Indonesia

    462 F. Supp. 1114 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 1978

    In Lisi v. … In Husserl v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cancino v. Craven

    305 F. Supp. 539 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 1969

    Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953); Schlette v. People of State of California, 284 F. 2d 827 (9th Cir., 1966); and Sampsell v. People of State of California, 191 F.2d 721 (9th Cir., 1951). … Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969), and United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bulletin Displays, LLC v. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc

    518 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 6, 2007

    In Klehr v. A.O. … Under Blank v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Carmen Claudia Salgado v. Andrew M. Saul

    District Court, C.D. California · Jul 9, 2021

    Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493; Holohan v. Massanari, 246 17 F.3d 1195, 1202-03 n. 1 (9th Cir. 2001); Chavez v. … Bagner, III, M.D., a board eligible psychiatrist. (AR 629-633.) Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ray Charles Foundation v. Robinson

    919 F. Supp. 2d 1054 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 25, 2013

    Brown Elec. Contractor, Inc. v. Rhino Elec. … Brown that do not require any action by the Copyright Office, so they fall outside the anti-SLAPP statute. Defendants are correct.

    Reversed on other grounds by The Ray Charles Foundation v. Raenee Robinson, 795 F.3d 1109 (2015)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Corey Williams v. Ricardo Garcia

    District Court, C.D. California · Feb 17, 2023

    Order following Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint in 25 Zavala v. Ronald Brown, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-4472-SJO(ASx), (C.D. Cal. … U.S. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carole Butcher v. Scott Wilkinson

    District Court, C.D. California · Dec 13, 2019

    (See, generally, Twana Brown v. Scott Wilkinson, et al., Case No. CV 19-5568 FMO (AGRx) (C.D. Cal.) (“Brown”), Dkt. 1, “Brown Complaint’; Haitham Saeed v. Scott Wilkinson, et_al., Case No. … Huene v. United States, 743 F.2d 703, 704 (9th Cir. 1984). “A district court generally has ‘broad’ discretion to consolidate actions[.]” Pierce v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Heichman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

    943 F. Supp. 1212 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 26, 1995

    v. … Franchise Tax Board, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Western State University of Southern California v. American Bar Ass'n

    301 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 6, 2004

    (citing Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents, & Assocs., Inc. v. Brown, 875 F.2d 453, 456 (5th Cir.1989)). 3 2. … (citing Sanjuan v. American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 250 (7th Cir.1994)); Medical Institute of Minnesota v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.