Case law

Moeller v. Qualex, Inc.

458 F. Supp. 2d 1069 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 27, 2006

In March 2003, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants’ representative contacted her and told her that she needed to voluntarily terminate her employment in order to qualify for long term disability benefits. … Defendants clearly have an ERISA-cov-ered plan in place — the plan that covered Defendants’ non-union employees and under which Plaintiff initially sought benefits.

Jacqueline Garcia v. Marathon Petroleum Logistics Services, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 20, 2026

If only 18 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 19 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 20 the margins … If only 2 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 3 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 4 the margins).

Cecil Elmore Jr v. Starbucks Coffee Company; Starbucks Corporation; Doe 1

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 10, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 18 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 19 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Gerardo Cabanillas v. City of South Gate et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 3 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 4 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the … If only a portion or portions 14 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Sheryl Pulver v. Nissan North America, Inc., a Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2025

If only a 8 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 9 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 10 markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of 20 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 21 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Eduardo Gonzalez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 25, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 28 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 9 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 10 privilege review.

In Re Entropin, Inc. Securities Litigation

487 F. Supp. 2d 1141 · District Court, C.D. California · May 3, 2007

Wynn may have “unblinded” the study from the very first patient, Brown Depo. at 50:15-52:12, 53:9-54:24, 81:7-82:23, which clearly had “far-reaching implications.” … Kaplan, 49 F.3d at 1373-74 ; In re Immune Response Sec. Litigation, 375 F.Supp.2d 983, 1022 (S.D.Cal.2005).

Kenneth Soto v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 17 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 19

Jordan Sherwood v. Charter Communications, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 17 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Esperanza Rios v. Global Analytical Development LLC, a corporate entity form unknown; and Does 1-50, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 2026

If only a 9 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 10 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 11 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page 21 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 22 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 23

Fadi Khamasmeih v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 17 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 19

Rad Communications Inc. v. Security National Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 5, 2025

If only a 24 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 25 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 26 markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 17 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 18 without prior privilege review.

Jeffrey Rudolph v. Marriott International Administrative Services, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 30, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 25 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 26 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 8 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 9 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 10 markings in the margins).

David Sanchez Banaga v. California Highway Patrol

District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a 10 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 11 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 21 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 23 margins

Rowden v. Pacific Parking Systems, Inc.

282 F.R.D. 581 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 2, 2012

One such manageability concern is a court’s ability to clearly define and ascertain the contours of the proposed class. Schwartz v. … The parties did not raise the issue of whether Laguna Beach qualifies as a "merchant" within the meaning of FACTA.

Paul Lehrman v. New York State

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 3, 2019

A violation of a state constitutional right alone “does not establish a basis for a § 1983 lawsuit.” Armstrong v. Asselin, 734 F.3d 984, 989 (9th Cir. 2013). … In particular, if Plaintiff believes there are amendments to his Complaint that would render it cognizable, he should set them forth clearly and explain why they would render his claim viable in federal court.

Gwen H. v. George Foreman

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 23, 2023

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 26 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 27 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate … If only a 14 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 16 protected portion

GRAHAM GOULDMAN, an individual v. HARVEY LISBERG, an individual; California corporation and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 | qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 5 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material 15 | ona page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 16 | protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins)

Coleman v. Allison

223 F. Supp. 3d 1035 · District Court, C.D. California · May 28, 2015

The law is well established that, while egregious attorney misconduct can qualify as an “extraordinary circumstance” that can warrant equitable tolling, a “garden variety claim” of attorney negligence does not warrant equitable … Instead, the Supreme Court “qualifie[d] Coleman by recognizing a narrow exception: Inadequate assistance of counsel at initial-review collateral proceedings 23 may establish cause for a prisoner’s procedural default of a

Westways World Travel, Inc. v. AMR Corp.

218 F.R.D. 223 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 9, 2003

In this ease, Plaintiffs contend that the action qualifies under both Rule 23(b)(2) and Rule 23(b)(3). … Whether there are 1,400 or 10,000 class members is inconsequential because either number clearly meets the threshold of joinder impracticability. Harris v.