Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
0.65s
JC Ex Rel. RC v. BEVERLY HILLS UNIFIED SCHOOL
711 F. Supp. 2d 1094 · District Court, C.D. California · May 6, 2010
In support of her argument, Plaintiff cites the Second Circuit case Thomas v. Board of Educ., 607 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir. 1979). … Plaintiff also cites Porter v. Parish School Board, 393 F.3d 608 (5th Cir.2004), in support of her position.
Cited 0 timesPublishedD.A.R.E. America v. Rolling Stone Magazine
101 F. Supp. 2d 1270 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 27, 2000
Tieberg v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, 2 Cal.3d 943, 946 , 88 Cal.Rptr. 175, 177 , 471 P.2d 975 (1970). … Policy Advisory Board describing D.A.R.E.’s “efforts to prevent a second presentation of the RTI study through litigation,” and a letter from the Board to local D.A.R.E. chapters “expressing D.A.R.E.’s concerns about research
Cited 13 timesPublishedManok v. Southeast District Bowling Association
306 F. Supp. 1215 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 3, 1969
Smith v. Kern County Medical Association, 19 Cal.2d 263 , 120 P.2d 874 ; Kronen v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists, 237 Cal.App.2d 289, at 301 , 46 Cal.Rptr. 808 ; Berkeley Teacher’s Association v. … Board of Education, 254 Cal.App.2d 660 , 62 Cal.Rptr. 515 .
Cited 8 timesPublished757 F. Supp. 2d 971 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 3, 2010
Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 , 125 S.Ct. 1432 , 161 L.Ed.2d 334 (2005). … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKhademi v. South Orange County Community College District
194 F. Supp. 2d 1011 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2002
CV 99-9482 ABC (Mcx), plaintiffs Diep Burbridge, Scott Stephan-sky, and Dorothy Caruso brought a challenge to Defendant’s Board Policy 5406. … See Burbridge v. Sampson, 74 F.Supp.2d 940 (C.D.Cal.1999). 1 In the summer of 2000, Defendant adopted a new time, place, and manner regulation, Board Policy 8000.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCarpenter v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
101 F. Supp. 3d 911 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 27, 2015
The standard for general jurisdiction is explained in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011) and Daimler AG v. … Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 572 F.3d 1271, 1281 (11th Cir.2009) (internal quotation marks removed).
Cited 5 timesPublishedJames Jordan McClain v. Robert Neuschmid
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 14, 2020
Petitioner then filed a second habeas petition in Orange County Superior Court that included an affidavit of Georgia Brown (Ms. “Brown”) dated January 31, 2019. Id. at 5, 39-40. … Nino v. Galaza, 183 F.3d 1003, 1006 (9th Cir. 1999).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2024
Defendant Members of the San Bernardino County Board of 17 Supervisors (the “Board of Supervisors”) are responsible for overseeing the County’s polices, 18 practices, and operations, and appointing and supervising the … Brown, 2021 WL 4434011, at *9 (D. Or. Sept. 27, 2021) cites Clark K. v. Guinn, 25 2007 WL 1435428, at *15 (D. Nev. May 14, 2007) and Charlie H. v. Whitman, 83 F. Supp. 2d 476 (D.N.J. 2000).
Cited 0 timesUnknown504 F. Supp. 2d 825 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 24, 2007
See Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979).
Cited 8 timesPublished558 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 3, 2008
See Miller v. Keeney, 882 F.2d 1428, 1433 (9th Cir.1989); see also Morrison v. … See Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 745-46 (9th Cir.2002).
Cited 1 timesPublishedGolden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
660 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 23, 1987
On September 4, 1980, the City’s Board of Transportation Commissioners recommended the renewal of Golden State’s franchise. … In Chapman v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 2026
SACV 25-01890-MCS (AGR) 10 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 11 v. … Id.; Earp v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNelson Perkins v. Gloria Allred
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2025
Nelson v. Starr, No. 2:25-cv-01407-SB (C.D. Cal.); Nelson v. Biden, No. 2:25-cv-03601-SB (C.D. Cal.); Nelson v. Harris, No. 2:25-cv-03602-SB (C.D. Cal.), Nelson v. Gonzalez, No. 2:25-cv-03462-SB (C.D. Cal.); Nelson v. … See, e.g., Perkins v. Allred, No. 2:25-cv-04158-SB (C.D. Cal), Dkt. No. 1 at 7 of 10 (identifying his various names). 3 Perkins v. Brown, No. 2:25-cv-04073-SB (C.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLouis v. McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp.
460 F. Supp. 2d 1153 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 18, 2006
v. … Board of Trustees, 27 Cal.App.4th 853, 862 , 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 892 (1994) ].
Cited 85 timesPublishedGyro Engineering Corp. v. United States
276 F. Supp. 454 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 19, 1967
Brown, 380 U.S. 563 , 85 S.Ct. 1162 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965). XX Especially illuminating in a situation outside the confines of Internal Revenue Code of 1954 § 351 is Foresun, Inc. v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 563 , 85 S.Ct. 1162 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965), because the transaction in Brown was negotiated only after, in the words of the Supreme Court, “considerable good faith bargaining at arm’s length between the Brown
Cited 4 timesPublishedControl Components, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
439 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 28, 1977
Von Brimer v. Whirlpool Corp., 536 F.2d 838 (9th Cir. 1976); Transducer Patents Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 492 F.2d 247 (9th Cir. 1974). … See, e. g., Von Brimer v. Whirlpool, supra; Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Co., supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLos Angeles News Service v. CONUS COM. CO. LTD. PARTNERSHIP
969 F. Supp. 579 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 9, 1997
Plaintiffs own the copyrights to the videotape pictures that they call “Beating of Reginald Denny,” “Beating of Man in White Panel Truck,” “Beating of Man in Brown Hatchback with Rescue,” and “[JJapanese Man in Brown Bronco … See also Bryks v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedRosen Entertainment Systems, LP v. Eiger Vision
343 F. Supp. 2d 908 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 2004
Its mounting structure includes “integral circuit board projections” that extend more than 1/2 inch from the flat surface of the frame structure. … Polymer Techs. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished245 F.R.D. 429 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 4, 2007
Brown v. Regents, 151 Cal.App.3d 982, 989 , 198 Cal.Rptr. 916 (1984). Brown provides a similar example. … See, e.g., In re Paxil Litig., 212 F.R.D. 539, 550 (C.D.Cal.2003); Brown, 151 Cal.App.3d at 991 , 198 Cal.Rptr. 916 ; Osborne, 198 Cal.App.3d at 651 , 243 Cal.Rptr. 815 . For example, in Ikonen v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedDysthe v. Basic Research, L.L.C.
273 F.R.D. 625 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 8, 2011
Epstein v. MCA, Inc., 54 F.3d 1422, 1423 (9th Cir.1995). … Withers v. eHarmony, Inc., 267 F.R.D. 316, 320 (C.D.Cal.2010) (quoting Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc., 501 F.2d 324, 341 (7th Cir.1974) (quotation marks omitted)).
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna