Case law

Zhang v. Napolitano

663 F. Supp. 2d 913 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2009

Unlike sections 203(h)(1) and (2), which when read in tandem clearly define the universe of petitions that qualify for the “delayed processing formula,” the language of section 203(h)(3) does not expressly state which petitions … qualify for automatic conversion and retention of priority dates. 25 I. & N.

Maryam Balouch v. Steven D. Park; Vincent Tremonti; Park Lawless & Tremonti LLP

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2026

If only 12 a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 21 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 22 privilege review.

Doreen Acra v. California Magnolia Convalescent Hospital, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 1, 2021

This immunity is broad. … jurisdiction,” i.e., “the extent to which the broad immunities afforded under the PREP Act apply to Defendant’s conduct.”

Delarosa v. Boiron, Inc.

818 F. Supp. 2d 1177 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 25, 2011

Judgment on the pleadings is therefore appropriate only “when the moving party clearly establishes on the face of the pleadings that no material issue of fact remains to be resolved and that it is entitled to judgment as … Defendant argues, without authority, that “even though the statutory heading *1186 for this section is entitled ‘Exceptions,’ subsection 379r(d)(l) clearly establishes the preemptive effect of all regulations and statutory

Nancy Kaczmarek v. University Council-American Federation of Teachers; United Field Representative Employees

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 30, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 3 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 4 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 14 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Dubrow v. Small Business Administration

345 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, C.D. California · May 19, 1972

The SBA therefore sought to preserve the few remaining millions of dollars to those able to establish eligibility by a clear showing of need for the amount requested and reasonable ability to repay. … The Disaster Relief Act clearly states that the SBA shall administer disaster relief loans in accordance with its *9 administration of the Disaster Loan Program.

Inland Empire Enterprises, Inc. v. Morton

365 F. Supp. 1014 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 30, 1973

The Complaint alleges that at all times the Plaintiff Inland Empire Enterprises, Inc., was a California corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California and qualified to do business in the State of California … Davis, supra, the United States Supreme Court has established guidelines for determining whether there should be Federal intervention. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), Boyle v.

John JB Doe v. United States of America

District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 2 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 12 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Sinatra Washington, et al. v. United States of America

District Court, C.D. California · May 4, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 10 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 11 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 21 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

William Fuentes v. Deputy Angel Blanco; Doe Deputies 1 – 10

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 19, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 20 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 22 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production

CSCDA Community Improvement Estate Partners, LLC; Oceanaire Recovery, LEC dba Genesis v. Does 1 through 50, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 17, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 10 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 11 |} portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions 21 || ofthe material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Joel E. Felix v. Stephen H. Dye; Charles F. Harlow; Mortenson Taggart Adams LLP

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 15 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the 25 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 26 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Jason Gold v. Cerence Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 7 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material 17 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 18 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

DANILO CALDERON v. AMIR NASSIHI; MOHAMMAD U. TARIQ; SARAH GARBUZOV

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 12, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 12 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 13 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 23 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 24 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Urban Fab Corp. v. Entro, Inc., et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 7, 2025

If only 11 a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 12 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 13 markings in the margins … If only a 23 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 24 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 25 markings in the margins

A.O. v. Glendale Unified School District, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 16, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 2 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 12 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

Jeremy Weaver v. Central Transport LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 20, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 8 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 18 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 19 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

White v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

803 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 15, 2011

Convenience Award, a claimant need only to sign a statement attesting to her belief that she qualifies as a class member. … Clearly, then, there is no subclass comprised of people with zero knowledge of their credit files. .

Kecia Smith v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., a Rhode Island corporation; Garfield Beach CVS, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 2026

If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 11 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 12 markings in the margins … If only a 22 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 23 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 24 markings in the margins

Matthew C. Lopez v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity; Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, an agency of the County of Los Angeles; Correctional Health Services, an agency of the County of Los Angeles; Does 1 to 10, Inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 20, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 10 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 11 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions 21 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 22 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the