Case law

City of Colton v. AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC.

824 F. Supp. 2d 1015 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 9, 2011

See Merry v. … The Water Board issued that CAO on the same day. SSUF No. 25; Johnson Deck, Ex. V.

QR SPEX, INC. v. Motorola, Inc.

588 F. Supp. 2d 1240 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 2008

See Metabolite Labs., Inc. v. Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings, 370 F.3d 1354, 1360 (Fed.Cir.2004); Ferguson Beauregard v. … Stumbo v.

Harrison v. Catholic Healthcare West Group Long Term Disability Plan

612 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 2009

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Glenn As an initial matter, in June of 2008, the Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. … In Glenn , the Court revisited its holding in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v.

Hootkins v. Napolitano

645 F. Supp. 2d 856 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 28, 2009

United States v. … Rather, the remand necessarily required that the issue be addressed by the Board itself.” Defs' 9th Cir. Reply at 19, citing Gonzales v.

Selph v. Council of City of Los Angeles

390 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 13, 1975

McDonald v. Board of Election COM of Chicago, 394 U.S. 802 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 , 22 L.Ed.2d 739 (1969); Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134, 143 , 92 S.Ct. 849 , 31 L.Ed.2d 92 (1972). … In Rosario v.

Phu Phung v. FCA US, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 24, 2020

As the Ninth Circuit held Libhart v. … See also Abada v.

Landscape Specialties, Inc. v. Laborers' International Union of North America

477 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 25, 1979

Ayala v. United States, 550 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. dismissed, 435 U.S. 982 , 98 S.Ct. 1635 , 56 L.Ed.2d 76 (1978). … See also N.L.R.B. v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 38, 338 F.2d 23, 30 (9th Cir. 1964). 8 .

Aloha Consolidators International v. United States

395 F. Supp. 1006 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 13, 1975

By Report and Order issued on May 21, 1973, the Commission’s Review Board No. 3, a three-member Board, found that a grant of substantially all of the authority requested by Blanco would be consistent with the public interest … Co. v. Norfolk & W. R. Co., 385 U.S. 57, 69-70 , 87 S.Ct. 255 , 17 L.Ed.2d 162 (1966); Bowman Transportation, Inc. v.

Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, Inc.

569 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 1983

Most of these cases are collected and analyzed in Perini Corp. v. Orion Ins. Co., 331 F.Supp. 453 (E.D.Cal. 1971). See also Colonial Bank & Trust Co. v. … E.g., Jones v. Daly, 122 Cal.App.3d 500, 510 , 176 Cal.Rptr. 130 (1981). On the removal/remand issue, defendant is bound by the allegations of the complaint. Cf. Alton Box Board Co. v.

Hornsby v. Lufthansa German Airlines

593 F. Supp. 2d 1132 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 6, 2009

See Roberts v. Corrothers, 812 F.2d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir.1987). … The Convention provides the exclusive remedy for injuries or damage to individuals incurred on board international flights. Montreal Convention Art. 29; Aikpitanhi v.

In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities Litigation

588 F. Supp. 2d 1132 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 1, 2008

He alleges specific dates when he reported to Countrywide’s board and states that the board “knew that appraisers were strongly encouraged to inflate appraisal values by as much as 6% to allow homeowners to ‘roll up’ [into … Dough- *1155 erty and Kathleen Brown had their own counsel. Dougherty and Brown’s (“D & B’s”) arguments are therefore identified separately where appropriate. KPMG submitted separate briefing.

Reed v. County of Orange

716 F. Supp. 2d 876 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 10, 2010

Some deputies, for example, those assigned to corrections, may not wear the body armor and full Sam Browne belt. (Pl.’s Mot. Summ. J., Ex. 1 at 61.05.0.) … Steiner v. Mitchell, 350 U.S. 247 , 76 S.Ct. 330 , 100 L.Ed. 267 (1956); Bamonte v. City of Mesa, 598 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 2010); Ballaris v.

Garamendi v. SDI Vendome S.A.

276 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 4, 2003

For example, Marc Ladreit de Laeharriere, a member of the Board of Directors of Credit Lyonnais, acted as a front in the ELIC transaction through his company. … Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., 7 Cal.4th 926, 931 , 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 440 , 873 P.2d 613 (1994).

Meinhold v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

949 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 6, 1996

In Morales v. … Costa v.

Corona v. Quad Graphics Printing Corp.

218 F. Supp. 3d 1068 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 2016

“[W]hen the employee’s claim is based on conduct normally occurring in the workplace, it is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.” Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Prot. … Fretland v.

Zurich Specialties London Ltd. v. Bickerstaff, Whatley, Ryan & Burkhalter, Inc.

650 F. Supp. 2d 1064 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 2009

Co. v. … Conestoga failed to return the rider to the state board, so it never took effect. Id.

Anthony Nuño v. Deborah Boschini et al.

District Court, C.D. California · May 29, 2026

Rodriquez; Marcus Brown; Lena 22 Taub-Robles; and Maryann Parada. (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 50.) … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 10 563 (1968). Damiano v. Grants Pass Sch. Dist. No. 7, 140 F.4th 1117, 1137 (9th Cir. 11 2025). “First, a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of retaliation.”

Burke v. French Equipment Rental, Inc.

498 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 1980

See Burroughs v. Board of Trustees, 542 F.2d 1128 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1096 , 97 S.Ct. 1113 , 51 L.Ed.2d 543 (1977); Alvares v. … Waggoner v.

Jarrod Browne v. Cedars Sinai Health System

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 26, 2023

Fidelitad, Inc. v. Insitu, Inc., 904 F.3d 1095, 1099 (9th Cir. 2018). III. … Cnty. of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp., 32 F.4th 733, 756 (9th Cir. 2022) (citing Watson, 551 U.S. at 152-53).

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena for Verplank

329 F. Supp. 433 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 1971

And yet, his encounter with his draft board may be one of the most significant experiences in his life. … See, DeGregory v. Attorney General of New Hampshire, 383 U.S. 825 , 86 S.Ct. 1148 , 16 L.Ed.2d 292 (1966); Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539 , 83 S.Ct. 889 , 9 L.Ed.2d 929 (1963); NAACP v.