Case law

Michael Hood v. City of Tustin; Alex Cowdell; Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.; Tricia Damian; Jesse Sanchez; and Does 1–20, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · May 19, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in this 23 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 24 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material … If only a portion of the material on 3 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 4 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 5

Los Angeles NAACP v. Los Angeles Unified School District

518 F. Supp. 1053 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 16, 1981

Additionally, they assert two grounds peculiar to themselves, Eleventh Amendment immunity and lack of an Article III justiciable controversy. … Thus, the possibility of a retrial and the taking of additional evidence remains open; certainly, Crawford II does not clearly preclude such a result.

Gilbert Garcia v. Welltower OpCo Group LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 2023

Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392–93 (1987) (establishing the “well-pleaded complaint” rule). … Thus, reliance on an agency’s advisory opinion is insufficient to establish federal jurisdiction.4 Id.

Mujica v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.

381 F. Supp. 2d 1134 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 28, 2005

Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430-31 , 107 S.Ct. 1207 , 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987) (holding that, in order to establish that they “would be threatened” for purposes of asylum, the alien “must establish by objective evidence that … The unavailability of a remedy is a firmly established ground for finding that the alternative forum is inadequate.

Brian Velazquez v. FCA US, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 2, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in this 2 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 3 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 4 material … If only 10 a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 11 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins).

Perez-Funez v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service

611 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 1984

When mandatory, rather than prohibitive, relief is being sought, however, the plaintiffs must “clearly establish that a change in the status quo is warranted,” Orantes-Hernandez v. … Greenville Airport Comm’n., 284 F.2d 631 , 633 (4th Cir.1960) (Negroes excluded from airport waiting room — "District Court has no discretion to deny relief by preliminary injunction to a person who clearly establishes by

Angela Diamos v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 19, 2020

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 9 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 10 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 20 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 21 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 22 in the margins).

Johnson v. Macy

145 F. Supp. 3d 907 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 16, 2015

Second, defendant asserts that “[a]n issue exists as to whether Plaintiff has a qualified disability.” (See PI Opp. at 3). Defendant attempts to distinguish Gonzalez v. … Then, defendant argues, “[t]hese facts are contrary to the facts of this case as it has already been established that Plaintiff can walk and has not established her prima facie case that she is likely to succeed on the merits

Xclusive-Lee, Inc. v. Christine Teigen

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 23, 2026

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 5 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 6 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a 16 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 17 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 18 in the margins).

Megan Heredia v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 2026

If only a portion 6 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 7 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 8 margins). … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 20 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s)

Faramarz Naeim v. Robert L. Wilkie

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 26, 2020

The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery 9 Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent evidence 10 by declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 21 by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Veronica Romero v. Costco Wholesale Corp. and Does 1-10 Inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 2, 2026

If only a 18 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also mus 19 || clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 20 || margins). 21 … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies fo > || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) □□□□□□ 3 by making appropriate markings in the margins). 4 (b

Casey Taha, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Momentive Software, Inc., and Anaheim Ducks Hockey Club, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 17, 2026

Except as otherwise 6 provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or 7 Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be 8 clearly so designated before … If only a portion of the material on 27 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 28 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 1

Margaret Aguirre, an Individual v. AS ORE (ON JAVE COMPANY; Atlantica North America LLC, a Delaware Company; and Does 1-10, Inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 5, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in this 7 Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 8 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 9 material … If 27 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 28 1 also must clearly identify the protected portion

Avrek Law Firm, a California Professional Law Corporation v. Kimberly N. Acosta (also known as Kimberly Navarro), an individual

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 9, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in 12 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 13 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 14 material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 21 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 22 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Maryam Balouch v. Steven D. Park; Vincent Tremonti; Park Lawless & Tremonti LLP

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2026

If only 12 a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 21 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 22 privilege review.

Zhang v. Napolitano

663 F. Supp. 2d 913 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2009

Unlike sections 203(h)(1) and (2), which when read in tandem clearly define the universe of petitions that qualify for the “delayed processing formula,” the language of section 203(h)(3) does not expressly state which petitions … qualify for automatic conversion and retention of priority dates. 25 I. & N.

Ryan Lewis v. County of San Bernardino, a public entity; Deputy Elias Mendoza (#31905); Deputy Brandon Ventre (#17917); Deputy Chester Arizala (#J2153); and Does 1-10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 2, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings the margins) … If only a portion or portions of the material a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party must clearly identify the protected 28 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 1

Robinson v. California Board of Prison Terms

997 F. Supp. 1303 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 1998

The authority establishing the BPT is set forth in California Penal Code (“P.C.”) §§ 5075-5082. … Defendant BPT is, thus, immune under the Eleventh Amendment from suit for equitable relief or damages. Allison v. California Adult Authority, 419 F.2d 822, 822-23 (9th Cir.1969); Silver v.

Day v. Sears Holdings Corp.

930 F. Supp. 2d 1146 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 13, 2013

Thus, it does not appear that a complaint that employees were driving drunk after hours qualifies as a complaint that defendants violated § 6403. … Day, however, proffered no additional argument as to why her complaint qualified as a complaint about workplace safety.