Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,916 results
0.65s
930 F. Supp. 2d 1196 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 13, 2013
BACKGROUND On August 13, 2004, and September 28, 2004, plaintiff filed applications for J.M.HB. 1 seeking Child’s Insurance Benefits and a Lump-Sum Death Payment, alleging that J.M.H-B. qualifies as the child of Donnell Delon … that she is Brice’s child under the Social Security Act, clearly indicates that it reached that determination.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEnfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
9 F. Supp. 3d 1126 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 31, 2014
A second district court addressed the question of what qualifies as a combination claim. … The case law clearly establishes that single means claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (a), without recourse to a written description analysis regarding the scope of the disclosure or claim.
Cited 4 timesPublished817 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 1993
Departure is Necessary to Avoid Manifest Injustice Finally the unique circumstances of this case qualify as a combination of factors warranting departure to the level of the mandatory minimum. … Jackson, 968 F.2d 158, 161, 163 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 664 , 121 L.Ed.2d 589 (1992), the Second Circuit, interpreting the same statute, in contrast, held that " ‘cocaine base’ clearly is a scientific
Cited 6 timesPublished19 F. Supp. 2d 1100 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 1, 1994
He also has been treated for a heart ailment. 2 The Secretary determined that plaintiff was disabled by reason of these impairments as of June 1,1989, and he therefore qualified for Medicare benefits as of that date. … A disability benefits claimant must establish that he became disabled at some time prior to the expiration of his insured status. Burkhart v. Bowen, 856 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir.1988).
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.
213 F. Supp. 3d 1249 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2016
In short, even the dictionary definitions provided by defendant (see Dkt. 92-1, Motion at 34-35), do not clearly establish that the word “shoreline” or the term “adjoining shorelines” apply only to large bodies of water. … Cal. 2011) (a stream that dries up in the summer months “qualifies as a navigable water” under the CWA); U.S. v. Brink, 795 F.Supp.2d 565, 578-79 (S.D.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSheree Ali v. Portside Partners Ventura Harbor LLC
District Court, C.D. California · May 28, 2024
If only a 18 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 19 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by 20 making appropriate markings … If 2 only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 3 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 4 appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownEstate of Reynaldo Ramos v. County of Riverside, a public entity
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 15, 2025
If only a 11 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 12 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 13 markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 26 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 27 without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGilbert Garcia v. Welltower OpCo Group LLC
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 2023
Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392–93 (1987) (establishing the “well-pleaded complaint” rule). … Thus, reliance on an agency’s advisory opinion is insufficient to establish federal jurisdiction.4 Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKohn v. Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
289 F. Supp. 2d 1155 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 2003
Because the Regional Director has clearly established that the banner has been displayed (a fact the union does not dispute), the principle issue before the Court is whether the display of the banner constitutes a “threat … However, this picketing clearly appears to qualify as "primary” picketing and so is not activity covered by this petition: Jack Caviness testifies, "I observed ... approx 50 men with signs along the construction fence.
Cited 8 timesPublishedLawanda D. Small v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
District Court, C.D. California · May 7, 2020
Except as otherwise provided in 12 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 13 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 14 the … If only a portion of the 21 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 22 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 23 appropriate
Cited 0 timesUnknown324 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 7, 2004
Because .a statute of limitations constitutes a condition on the Government’s waiver of immunity, United States v. … income taxes, 11 plus statutory interest *1097 on the amount remitted. 12 In any event, Baral and 26 U.S.C. § 6513 (b)(2), pursuant to which the $22,382.00 is deemed to have been paid as “estimated tax” on April 15, 1997, clearly
Cited 22 timesPublishedHealthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Jan 11, 2023
does not—without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, 24 establishing … If only a portion of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 15
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. Winnie Mae Manufacturing Co.
451 F. Supp. 642 · District Court, C.D. California · May 22, 1978
Thus, it is clear that the 1324(a)(3) proviso is designed to protect the employer “who unwittingly, or unknowingly, or thoughtlessly hires a man he does not know to be a wetback . . . .” 8 It does not offer a blanket immunity … However, Tsutagawa clearly states that retention of the aliens does not necessarily mean incarceration with all of the concomitant costs of incarceration.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDonald Rubio v. County of Los Angeles, a municipal entity; and Does 1-10, inclusive.
District Court, C.D. California · Dec 17, 2025
If only a 21 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 22 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 23 markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 12 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 13 without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMichael K. Hamra v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California · Dec 2, 2019
If only a portion of the 16 || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 17 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 18 || margins). 19 … If only a portion of the 2 || material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 3 || identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 4 || margins). 5
Cited 0 timesUnknownCriswell v. Western Air Lines, Inc.
514 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, C.D. California · May 12, 1981
The circumstances of his retirement, however, are even more explicitly age-related and deserve recounting because they clearly indicate that Western, beyond any doubt, has enforced a mandatory retirement rule at age 60 for … In fact, Western requires its new second officers to become qualified as pilots within a certain period of time.
Cited 20 timesPublishedLos Angeles NAACP v. Los Angeles Unified School District
518 F. Supp. 1053 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 16, 1981
Additionally, they assert two grounds peculiar to themselves, Eleventh Amendment immunity and lack of an Article III justiciable controversy. … Thus, the possibility of a retrial and the taking of additional evidence remains open; certainly, Crawford II does not clearly preclude such a result.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · Aug 27, 2026
Except as otherwise 24 provided in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of 25 Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be 26 clearly so designated before … If only a portion of the material on 17 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 18
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Jul 28, 2026
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 6 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., 7 by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Jan 26, 2026
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 25 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 26 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 8 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 9 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 10
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna