Case law

Glendale Unified School District v. Almasi

122 F. Supp. 2d 1093 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 5, 2000

An established that they, did not consistently address these self-feeding goals during Talar’s OT sessions. Ms. … A placement offer must meet certain substantive and procedural requirements to qualify as a FAPE. See Ojai, 4 F.3d at 1469. 1.

DALE GLENN v. SCHOENBERG FINKEL BEEDERMAN BELL GLAZER LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 2026

If only a 13 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 14 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 15 margins). … If only a portion of the material 25 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 26 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 27 (b)

Denzell Young v. City of Culver City, Culver City Policy Department

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 25, 2026

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 16 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) ( … If 27 only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(

Sofa Entertainment, Inc. v. Dodger Productions, Inc.

782 F. Supp. 2d 898 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 12, 2010

Yet, Plaintiff identified no precedent clearly establishing that such a distinction is dispositive. Cf. Hofheinz v. … Accordingly, the Court concludes as a matter of law that Defendant’s use of the Clip qualifies as a fair use. y. CONCLUSION In light of the foregoing: 1.

Moore v. Gonzalez

911 F. Supp. 2d 898 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 5, 2012

However, the state court’s rejection of this claim was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d). … To obtain relief, Petitioner must show that the state court’s decision was an “unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law.”

Ashley Clarke v. Orange County Social Services Agency

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 14, 2025

Social workers enjoy absolute immunity for certain kinds of actions, but they are not immune from liability for “judicial deception.” … Assuming the Complaint pleads facts sufficient to show that Plaintiff and M.C. have an established bond that qualifies for First Amendment protections, the Complaint fails to state a claim that this right has been violated

Aranda v. Van Sickle

455 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 15, 1976

It contains no reference to race, either express or implied, and it clearly challenges the candidate as an individual who participated in a recall endeavor which *628 the editorial writer characterized as an attempt to “wreck … The reason for such election scheme was set forth in a letter to State Assemblyman James Keysor as follows: “However, in some cities the use of districts would not only artificially limit qualified people from serving on

Jonathan Peltz v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 9, 2023

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 7 || Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 8 || appropriate markings in the margins). 9 … If only a 18 || portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 19 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 20 || in the margins). 21

William Allen Garrett v. Josie Gastello

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 13, 2020

However, 7 the hearing report clearly states that the mental health assessment was considered by the 8 hearing officer. (Id. at 39.) … Plaintiff[’s] mental illness clearly 13 contributed to the behavior that led to these four RVRs.

Voight v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

28 F. Supp. 2d 569 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 15, 1998

However, after the first 24 months of benefit payments, you must also be completely and continuously unable to perform the duties of any gainful work or service for which you are reasonably qualified taking into consideration … Slack opined that, while Voight appeared to suffer from a psychiatric condition, “the record [did] not establish disability.” (Def.’s Ex. S at 107.) Dr.

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Fifth Third Corp.

882 F. Supp. 2d 1123 · District Court, C.D. California · May 14, 2010

Using that information, the system qualified a caller to be able to transfer funds. If the caller was not qualified, the caller was prompted to reenter the transfer amount. … The issue is clearly one for the jury to determine. This Court must draw inferences against each moving party.

Matthew Ralston v. City of Redondo Beach, Officer Warren, and Doe Officers 1-10

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in 11 || this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection 12 |}under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is … If only a portion 19 || or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21

Anthony Michael Valdez v. SoFi Bank N.A.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 4, 2026

If only a portion 2 or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 3 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins … If only a 14 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 15 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 16 markings in the margins

Fernande Lyons v. Cucmber Holdings, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 3, 2021

In its Opposition, Defendants argue that it has established that subject matter jurisdiction exists. … Instead, when applicable, the PREP Act provides immunity to defendants on state law claims.

Jordan Alan v. City of Los Angeles; Officer Vasquez, LAPD Serial No. 44741; Officer Alvarez, LAPD Serial No. 44807; Does 1-50, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 31, 2026

If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion of the material 6 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 7 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8 (b

Matthew Ralston v. City of Redondo Beach, Officer Warren, and Doe Officers 1-10

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in 11 || this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection 12 |}under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is … If only a portion 19 || or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21

Matthew Ralston v. City of Redondo Beach, Officer Warren, and Doe Officers 1-10

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 2026

Except as otherwise provided in 11 || this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection 12 |}under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is … If only a portion 19 || or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 20 || must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 21

Estate of Reynaldo Ramos v. County of Riverside, a public entity

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 15, 2025

If only a 11 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 12 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 13 markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 26 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 27 without prior privilege review.

Dominique Daniels v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 10, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 27 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 1 b. … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 12 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 13 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 14

Danoff v. United States

324 F. Supp. 2d 1086 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 7, 2004

Because .a statute of limitations constitutes a condition on the Government’s waiver of immunity, United States v. … income taxes, 11 plus statutory interest *1097 on the amount remitted. 12 In any event, Baral and 26 U.S.C. § 6513 (b)(2), pursuant to which the $22,382.00 is deemed to have been paid as “estimated tax” on April 15, 1997, clearly