Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
1.51s
Carter v. County of Los Angeles
770 F. Supp. 2d 1042 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 22, 2011
In Monell v. … Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112, 126-27 , 108 S.Ct. 915 , 99 L.Ed.2d 107 (1988); see also Board of County Commissioners v.
Cited 3 timesPublished640 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 25, 1985
Finally, in Johnson v. … Farms, Inc. v. Alton Box Board Co., 609 F.2d 112, 115 (4th Cir.1979) (“the entry of the order of remand” divested the district court of jurisdiction to act).
Cited 18 timesPublishedRichards v. County of Los Angeles
775 F. Supp. 2d 1176 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 2011
In Monell v. … Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112, 126-27 , 108 S.Ct. 915 , 99 L.Ed.2d 107 (1988); see also Board of County Commissioners v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.
343 F. Supp. 2d 922 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2004
(the “Board”) for a redetermination. … A provider may obtain judicial review of decisions by the Board under 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(l).
Cited 6 timesPublishedORANGE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AGENCY v. Dodge
793 F. Supp. 2d 1121 · District Court, C.D. California · May 31, 2011
Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 758 (9th Cir.2003) (citing Chang v. Chen, 80 F.3d 1293, 1296 (9th Cir.1996)); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir.2000); Polich v. … The county Board of Education sought a judgment denying the parent reimbursement for independent educational evaluations, which the Board of Education had been ordered to provide. Id.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGarden of Life, Inc. v. Letzer
318 F. Supp. 2d 946 · District Court, C.D. California · May 10, 2004
Project v. Shelley, 344 F.3d 914 , 918 (9th Cir.2003); Rodeo Collection, Ltd. v. West Seventh, 812 F.2d 1215 (9th Cir.1987). … See Virtual Works, Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHall v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.
146 F. Supp. 3d 1187 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 12, 2015
Subject to very limited judicial review, he will be bound by the result according to’ the finality provisions of the agreement” (citations omitted)); Brown v. … Over the years, it has-played host to the Emmy Awards, the Grammy Awards, the Rolling Stones, James Brown, Led -Zeppelin, Madonna, Barbra Streisand and hundreds of others”); August Brown, The Hollywood Palladium is for Sale
Cited 34 timesPublished809 F. Supp. 1393 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 4, 1992
Moreover, defendants asserted that the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Brown Bag Software v. … See also, Brown Bag, 960 F.2d at 1475-1476 ; Granite Music Corp. v. United Artists Corp., 532 F.2d 718, 720 (9th Cir.1976) (evidence of copying).
Cited 6 timesPublishedAmericans for Prosperity Foundation v. Harris
182 F. Supp. 3d 1049 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 21, 2016
See Brown v. Socialist Workers '7 4 Campaign Comm. (Ohio), 459 U.S. 87, 101-02 , 103 S.Ct. 416 , 74 L.Ed.2d 250 (1982); Louisiana v. NAACP, 366 U.S. at 297 , 81 S.Ct. 1333 . … Brown, 459 U.S. at 101-02 , 103 S.Ct. 416 ; Louisiana v. NAACP, 366 U.S. at 297 , 81 S.Ct. 1333 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedNational Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
635 F. Supp. 2d 1096 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 12, 2009
Lujan v. … United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 557 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996).
Cited 1 timesPublishedGray v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
560 F. Supp. 2d 928 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2008
Id. at 515 , 34 Cal.Rptr. 537 (quoting Cosper v. … (Brown Decl. ¶ 2; Tang Decl. ¶ 2.) Gray notes that both Mazda-Japan and Mazda-America warrant Mazda vehicles. (Anderson Decl. Ex. 2 pp. 2, 4, 6.)
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States of America v. California Institute of Technology
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 19, 2021
Barton to serve on the JCAP 2 Governance Board, while on notice that Dr. Barton was still a member of the Dow Chemicals Board of Directors. SUF 82-83. … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 378 (4th Cir. 2008)); U.S. ex rel. Butler v. Hughes Helicopters, Inc., 71 F.3d 321, 329 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The improper interpretation .
Cited 0 timesUnknown993 F. Supp. 1277 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 25, 1997
Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books, 109 F.3d 1394 , 1396 n. 2 (9th Cir.1997), citing Big Country Foods, Inc. v. Board of Educ., 868 F.2d 1085 , 1088 (9th Cir.1989). … Defendants assert that their products are different because they are “cut to fit Mexican Americans” 1 and are made in shades of red, brown, and green, in addition to indigo. Defs Opp. at 13.
Cited 8 timesPublishedIcon Desert Logistics v. City of Blythe
District Court, C.D. California · Apr 18, 2022
Brown knocked on the door, but no one answered. Brown Decl. § 5. … V. CITY OF BLYTHE POLICE DEPT., ET AL. inspection in July 2017, when he determined that the building was vacant. Brown Decl. § 9.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBain v. California Teachers Ass'n
156 F. Supp. 3d 1142 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 28, 2015
Finally, Plaintiffs interpret Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977), to hold that unions were state actors. (Dkt.76, 17.) In Abood . … In Beck v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedIndependent Living Center v. City of Los Angeles
296 F.R.D. 632 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 8, 2013
.”); Diaz v. … Plaintiffs also named as a defendant the Oversight Board for the CRA/LA, but all claims against the Oversight Board were dismissed pursuant to the Court’s Order of November 29, 2012. .
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn re Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc.
295 F.R.D. 438 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 17, 2014
Vaughns v. Board of Education of Prince George’s County, 18 F.Supp.2d 569, 578 (D.Md.1998). … Browning, 2007 WL 4105971 , at *5.
Cited 70 timesPublishedPfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.
545 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 8, 1980
In Ritter v. … V.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMiller v. Glenn Miller Productions
318 F. Supp. 2d 923 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 23, 2004
Notwithstanding the amount of consideration (ie., $1.00) specified in the 1956 license agreement, the minutes of a June 6, 1956 GMP Board meeting state that the Board agreed to pay Helen Miller $13,000 per year in re *928 … In Harris v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedThe Santa Barbara Smokehouse, Inc. v. AquaChile, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 2022
Smokehouse’s CEO Tim Brown (“Brown”) 16 rejected this offer and instead proposed a two-year 17 agreement. Id. ¶ 13. … Northrop Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna