Case law

United States v. Bradt

291 F. Supp. 1022 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 1968

Brown-Pacific-Maxon Company v. Toner, 255 F.2d 611 (7th Cir. 1958); National Labor Relations Board v. Prettyman, 117 F.2d 786 (6th Cir. 1941). … The cause is remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Board of Airport Commissioners

661 F. Supp. 1223 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 1985

In Rosen v. … Wolin v. Port of New York Authority, 392 F.2d 83 (2nd Cir.1968). The answer was no for the Port Authority and it is no for the Board of Airport Commissioners.

Orion Dillon Brown v. Warden

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 15, 2021

, Case No. 2:19-01196 SVW (ADS) 11 Petitioner, 12 v. … Anderson v. Air West, Inc., 542 F.2d 522, 17 524 (9th Cir. 1976).

Daniel Brown v. T. Cisneros

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2021

See Brown v. Montgomery, No. 2:14-cv-00069 (C.D. … Brown I (Dkt. 38, 41, 14 42). On September 23, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth 15 Circuit denied Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability. Brown I (Dkt. 16 48); see Brown v.

Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

371 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 25, 1973

Mallonee, 332 U.S. 245 , 67 S.Ct. 1552 , 91 L.Ed. 2030 (1947); Home Loan Bank Board v. Mallonee, 196 F.2d 336, 390 (9th Cir. 1952). … In People v.

Andrew Brown v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 11, 2022

Revels v. … Trevizo v.

K. Brown v. Alejandro Villanueva

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 2022

CV 22-5449-MWF(JEMx), Guzman v. Alejandro Villanueva, et al. CV 22-5450-MWF(JEMx), Brown v. Alejandro Villanueva, et al. CV 22-5453-MWF(JEMx), Gilbert v. … Brown v. Alejandro Villanueva, CV 22-5450-MWF(JEMx) T. Gilbert v. Alejandro Villanueva, CV 22-5453-MWF(JEMx) E. Guzman v.

Tiana Dannella Sara Brown v. Michelle King

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 28, 2025

of the court shall make a de novo determination of 11 those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to 12 which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also United States v. … Chith v. 21 Haynes, 2021 WL 4744596, at *1 (W.D. Wash.

Minasian v. Engle

292 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, C.D. California · May 12, 1967

Its decision, as in the case of a Selective Service board, when made in conformity with the regulations is final even though erroneous. Estep v. United States, supra. The recent case of Brown v. … This court is in agreement with the decision of Judge Lane in the Brown ease, supra.

Mayallpostan, LLC v. Loretta Brown

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2019

Brown, et al. Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. … and Nathaniel Brown, Jr.

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Baker

739 F. Supp. 1401 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 1990

Corp. v. … Brown, Church and Hastings Ltd., and Joseph L. Hastings is co-extensive to whatever duty is owed to the bank. See FDIC v.

Thomas v. Atascadero Unified School District

662 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 19, 1987

Defendants Kenneth Beck, Ray King, Carl Brown, Leslie Haynes, Emile La Salle, Susan Molle and Jean Thiebaud are the current elected members of the Board of Education of the School District (“School District”). … District 27 School Board v. Board of Education, 130 Misc.2d 398 , 502 N.Y.S.2d 325 (1986). 3.

Silver v. Jordan

274 F. Supp. 882 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 1967

The Court further takes judicial notice that the Supreme Court of the State of California in its decision dated October 6, 1967 in the cases of Silver et al. v. Reagan, etc. et al., No.Sac. 7814, and Vickter et al. v. … (See Silver v. Brown, 63 Cal.2d 316, 318 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 531 , 405 P.2d 571 ].) This order is final forthwith.” 2.

Joseph Nichols III v. Christian Pfeiffer

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 2019

Oct. 2, 2018); Bird v. Board, 2016 WL 15 3456838, at *2 (D. Mont. … See Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 371 (1987); Greenholtz, 442 28 U.S. at 12.

United States v. Pacific Southwest Airlines

358 F. Supp. 1224 · District Court, C.D. California · May 8, 1973

Authority for the first ground for dismissal, defendants assert, may be found in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1942) and subsequent cases relying on the rationale of that case. … This rather expansive language is immediately followed by a qualifying quote from Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. v. FTC, 263 F.2d 502, 509 (4th Cir. 1959): “The teaching of Parker v.

King v. Saddleback Junior College District

318 F. Supp. 89 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 17, 1970

Brown, 299 F.Supp. 1360, 1362 (N.D.Ala.1967), (“ * * * the classification of male students * * * by their hair style is unreasonable and fails to pass constitutional muster.”); Olff v. … Gillis, 315 F.Supp. 94 (N.D.Ill. 1969); Zachry v. Brown, supra.

Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. v. Limited, Inc.

587 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 27, 1984

Schoenkopf v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 637 F.2d 205, 210-11 (3d Cir.1980). … See, e.g., United States v. E.I. du Pont Nemours & Co., 353 U.S. 586 at 593-4 , 77 S.Ct. 872 at 877-8 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1057 ; Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. at 1523 .

Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Tyco International Ltd.

253 F.R.D. 528 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 11, 2008

See, e.g., United States v. … (footnote omitted)); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 357 F.3d 900 , 907 (9th Cir.2004) (same); Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary v.

Murphy v. National Shipping Corp.

459 F. Supp. 1173 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 20, 1978

Brown v. Ivarans Rederi, supra; Slaughter v. S.S. Ronde, 390 F.Supp. 637, 646-47 (S.D.Ga. 1974), aff’d per curiam, 509 F.2d 973 (5th Cir. 1975); Wiles v. Delta Steamship Co., 1976 A.M.C. 2646 (E.D.La.1976); Marant v. … Farrell Lines, Inc., supra; Brown v. Mitsubishi Shintaku Ginko, 550 F.2d 331 (5th Cir. 1977); Hurst v. Triad Shipping Co., 554 F.2d 1237 (3d Cir. 1977).

United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.

213 F. Supp. 3d 1249 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2016

THE REGIONAL BOARD’S SEVENTH CLAIM. … "The task of accomplishing [the goal of the highest water quality] belongs to the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) and the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards; together the State Board and the regional