Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

1.30s

  • Hubbs v. Alamao

    360 F. Supp. 2d 1073 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 14, 2005

    People v. … However, having dismissed plaintiffs federal claims, this Court declines to retain jurisdiction over plaintiffs supplemental state claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (c); Brown v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dees v. Distenfield

    618 F. Supp. 123 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 17, 1985

    As the Supreme Court noted in Scherk v. … On March 15, 1985, plaintiff agreed to submit the state law causes of action to arbitration and selected the Board of Arbitration of the New York Stock Exchange to decide the claims. 3 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp. v. Oceanbridge Shipping International, Inc.

    48 F. Supp. 2d 1032 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 8, 1999

    On or about September 1, 1997, Yang Ming shipped nine of the Laufer Containers to Hong Kong on board the M/V NEWPORT BRIDGE, and one of the Laufer Containers and all eight of the Oceanbridge Containers to Hong Kong on board … the BROOKLYN BRIDGE, and were subsequently shipped from Hong Kong to Tokyo on board the M/V MING SOUTH,.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Roe

    232 F. Supp. 2d 1073 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 15, 2002

    People v. Brown, 77 Cal. App.4th 1324, 1333 , 92 Cal.Rptr.2d 433, 438-439 (2000)(quoting a California State Assembly committee’s bill analysis prepared- for the enactment of Cal. … Brown, 77 Cal.App.4th at 1334 , 92 Cal.Rptr.2d at 439 (following People v. Falsetta,, 21 Cal.4th 903, 917 , 89 Cal.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Opus Corp.

    464 B.R. 361 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 2011

    Roberts”) asserts that, despite this provision, the Board, in reality, “did not have the ability to say ‘no’ to [a] request” for dividends from the parent company, and that Board approval was a mere “rubber stamp.” 21 The … Roberts, who occupied a board seat as CEO).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Haddad v. State of Cal.

    64 F. Supp. 2d 930 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 24, 1999

    Ezzell v. Board of Regents, 838 F.2d 1569, 1571 (11th Cir.1988) (citing Papasan, 478 U.S. at 277-78 , 106 S.Ct. 2932 ). … Freeburn, 29 F.Supp.2d 764, 775 (E.D.Mich.1998) and Zupan v. Brown, 5 F.Supp.2d 792, 797 (N.D.Cal.1998) with Figueroa v. Rivera, 147 F.3d 77 , 81 n. 3 (1st Cir.1998).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • C.F. v. Capistrano Unified School District

    647 F. Supp. 2d 1187 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2009

    In Craig v. … In Weinstein , a North Carolina prisoner brought an action against the North Carolina Board of Parole asserting that the Board was required to afford him certain procedural rights in considering his eligibility for parole

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • James Johnson v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Department

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2019

    Board of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. 27 v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404, 117 S. Ct. 1382, 137 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1997). In addition, a 1 the proximate cause of the constitutional deprivation.” Trevino v. … Nichols v. Brown, 859 F. Supp. 2d 1118, 1137 (C.D. Cal. 2012); see also Smith v. Cty. of Los Angeles, No. CV 12-02444- 25 JAK (JEM), 2013 WL 1829821, at *7 (C.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shaffer v. Field

    339 F. Supp. 997 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 20, 1972

    Robert Molett, the burglary suspect, had been crouched behind the stacked boards and was hit by the shot Shaffer fired. … United States v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Middlesex Retirement System v. Quest Software Inc.

    527 F. Supp. 2d 1164 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 22, 2007

    Smith (“Smith”) has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Quest (“the Board”) since 1998, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) since April 1997, and as a director since 1995. … Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 758 (9th Cir.2003) (citing Chang v. Chen, 80 F.3d 1293, 1296 (9th Cir.1996)); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir.2000).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Huston v. Imperial Credit Commercial Mortgage Investment Corp.

    179 F. Supp. 2d 1157 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 21, 2001

    Masayesva v. Hale, 118 F.3d 1371, 1382 (9th Cir.1997); see also Pegram v. … Dept. of Corp.’s v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Federal Trade Commission v. Commerce Planet, Inc.

    878 F. Supp. 2d 1048 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 22, 2012

    See FTC v. … See FTC v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • John S. Griffith Construction Co. v. Southern California Cement Masons Negotiating Committee

    607 F. Supp. 809 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 24, 1984

    In Local Union 204 v. … Castaneda v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Smeltzer v. Slater

    93 F. Supp. 2d 1095 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 28, 2000

    Plaintiff California State Legislative Board, United Transportation Union: The Plaintiff, California State Legislative Board, United Transportation Union, in its representative capacity, seeks redress on behalf of all UTU … Although Plaintiffs cite Skinner v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cordero v. CIA. Mexicana De Aviacion, S.A.

    512 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 13, 1981

    Such discrimination has been found where a denial of passage was based on race, 2 or where the carrier has failed to follow its own rules for boarding passengers in cases of oversale. 3 Under 49 U.S.C. § 1511 (a), an air … Fitzgerald v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 229 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1956). 3 . Smith v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., 567 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1978). 4 . Williams v. Trans World Airlines, 509 F.2d 942 (2d Cir. 1975).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Morton v. Rank America, Inc.

    812 F. Supp. 1062 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 1993

    Computer Prod. v. … Fender v. Prescott, 476 N.Y.S.2d 128 , 101 A.D.2d 418, 423 (1984), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 1077 , 489 N.Y.S.2d 880 , 479 N.E.2d 225 (1985), citing Robert N. Brown Assoc., Inc. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Pacific Legal Foundation v. Watt

    539 F. Supp. 841 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 1982

    The California Brown Pelican is listed as an endangered species by FWS. a. 50 C.F.R. § 17.11 , 35 Fed.Reg. 16,047 (1970). 18. … Betts v. Coltes, 467 F.Supp. 544, 546 (D.C. Hawaii, 1979); United States v. State of California, 403 F.Supp. 874, 902 (E.D.Cal.1975); Factora v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Speaker Ex Rel. Speaker v. COUNTY, SAN BERNARDINO

    82 F. Supp. 2d 1105 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 2, 2000

    In Folb v. … Davis, and the Board’s approval noted thereon; 3) a check to the Board for a renewal of the application for the 1993 year; and 4) an annual report by Dr.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Loree Rodkin Management Corp. v. Ross-Simons, Inc.

    315 F. Supp. 2d 1053 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2004

    Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). … Roth Greeting Cards v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Baker

    758 F. Supp. 1340 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 1991

    It traces the historical duties of the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, and the FSLIC. … The bank was subsequently closed by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board and FSLIC filed suit in its capacity as receiver.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.