Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

1.07s

  • Elsinore Christian Center v. City of Lake Elsinore

    291 F. Supp. 2d 1083 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 21, 2003

    See, e.g., Board of Dirs. of Rotary Int’l v. Rotary Club of Duarte, 481 U.S. 537, 549 , 107 S.Ct. 1940 , 95 L.Ed.2d 474 (1987) (remedying discrimination against women and racial minorities); United States v. … City of Boerne, 521 U.S. at 519-20, 526 , 117 S.Ct. 2157 ; accord Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 365 , 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001); Kimel v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Elsinore Christian Center v. City of Lake Elsinore

    270 F. Supp. 2d 1163 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 24, 2003

    See, e.g., Board of Dirs. of Rotary Int’l v. Rotary Club of Duarte, 481 U.S. 537, 549 , 107 S.Ct. 1940 , 95 L.Ed.2d 474 (1987) (remedying discrimination against women and racial minorities); United States v. … City of Boerne, 521 U.S. at 519-20, 526 , 117 S.Ct. 2157 ; accord Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 365 , 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001); Kimel v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Maloney v. T3Media, Inc.

    94 F. Supp. 3d 1128 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 6, 2015

    Browne v. McCain, 611 F.Supp.2d 1062, 1068 (C.D.Cal.2009) (citing Overstock.com, Inc. v. Gradient Analytics, Inc., 151 Cal.App.4th 688, 699-700 , 61 Cal.Rptr.3d 29 (Cal.Ct.App.2007)). … Browne v. McCain, 611 F.Supp.2d 1062, 1068 (C.D.Cal.2009); accord Smith v. Santa Rosa Democrat, No. C 11-02411 SI, 2011 WL 5006463 , at *7 (ND.Cal.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Snellink v. Gulf Resources, Inc.

    870 F. Supp. 2d 930 · District Court, C.D. California · May 15, 2012

    Gulfs common stock was actively traded under the ticker “GFRE” on the NASDAQ and the OTC BB (Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board). (Id. ¶ 26.) … Morley v. Walker, 175 F.3d 756, 759 (9th Cir.1999). III.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. Currency

    527 F. Supp. 2d 1103 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2007

    See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 604 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (“The voluntariness of the statement is a threshold requirement.”). … See Brown, 422 U.S. at 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 . A few courts have held that the Government’s burden can only be met with “clear and convincing evidence.” Collins v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Diaz v. Allstate Insurance Group

    185 F.R.D. 581 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 14, 1998

    Brown v. Allstate, 17 F.Supp.2d 1134, 1138-39 (S.D.Cal. 1998), citing Doctors’ Co. v. Superior Court, 49 Cal.3d 39, 44 , 260 Cal.Rptr. 183 , 775 P.2d 508 (1989). See also Davis & Cox v. … See Brown v. Allstate, 17 F.Supp.2d 1134 (S.D.Cal.1998) (making this observation).

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Myron v. United States

    382 F. Supp. 590 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 1974

    R. v. … The court in John Duguid & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ministry of Health v. Shiley Inc.

    858 F. Supp. 1426 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 1, 1994

    June 13, 1994) (preempting tort claims against manufacturer of penile prosthesis, which bypassed premarket approval through 510(k) notification); Brown v. … Brown v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.3d 1049 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 (1988). Brown held, for policy reasons, that drug manufacturers could not be held strictly liable for design defects in prescription drugs.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Green v. Baca

    306 F. Supp. 2d 903 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 20, 2004

    Plaintiff cannot sue the Board of Prison Terms or the Department of Corrections as they are arms of the state of California. See Chamberlin v. … (the Board of Prison Terms and the Department of Corrections are not subject to suit under the Eleventh Amendment); Frye v. Board of Prison Terms, 961 F.2d 216 , 1992 WL 84210, * 2 (9th Cir. Apr.24, 1992) (Unpub.Disp.)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Comfort v. Fund for the Republic, Inc.

    422 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 1976

    Its board of directors consisted of some 25 wealthy persons who contributed generously to its work. … Schirmer Stevedoring Company Ltd. v. Seaboard Stevedoring Corp., 306 F.2d 188, 194 (9th Cir. 1962).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Motus v. Pfizer Inc.

    196 F. Supp. 2d 984 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 20, 2001

    Brown v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco, 44 Cal.3d 1049, 1058 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 (1988). … Thomas v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Westways World Travel v. AMR Corp.

    182 F. Supp. 2d 952 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 10, 2001

    Toms v. … of Directors (“Board”).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Nosrati v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.

    383 F. Supp. 3d 990 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 16, 2019

    In du Mortier v. Mass. Gen. Life Ins. Co. , 805 F. Supp. 816 (C.D. … Mandala v. Cal. Law Enf't Ass'n , 561 F. Supp. 2d 1130 , 1133-34 (C.D. Cal. 2008). In Hanson v. United Life Ins. Co. , 170 F. Supp. 2d 966 (C.D.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Meat Cutters Union Local No. 421

    360 F. Supp. 548 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 1973

    As so succinctly stated in Direct Transit Lines v. … Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Marilyn Gladle v. U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2020

    Brown, Ms. Weldon, or Mr. Love. Sec. SUF No. 81. … See e.g., Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 (1976): Vinieratos v. Dep’t of the Air Force, 939 F.2d 762, 773-75 (9th Cir. 1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sherman v. Behner

    58 F.R.D. 70 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 18, 1973

    Kahan informed Edward Drew, Chief Deputy Clerk of this Court, that allegations in Sherman v. Dellums, Civil No. 72-1917-AAH and Sherman v. … [Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972) and Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2708 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)]. 4. The complaint is dismissed without leave to amend.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Aeilts

    855 F. Supp. 1114 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 27, 1994

    See United States v. Brown, 918 F.2d 82, 84 (9th Cir.1990). The person must claim the privilege on a document-by-document or question-by-question basis. See id.; United States v. … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 918 F.2d 82 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Rendahl, 746 F.2d 553 (9th Cir.1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Yahoo! Litigation

    251 F.R.D. 459 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 21, 2008

    Corp. v. … Defendants rely on Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Cantillon

    309 F. Supp. 700 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 1970

    Cyc.Fed.Proc. 42.38; Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 , 82 S.Ct. 1038 , 8 L.Ed.2d 240 . In United States v. … Brown v. United States, 359 U.S. 41 , 79 S.Ct. 539 , 3 L.Ed.2d 609 . In the instant case there was during the first conference an inquiry by the court when there were four defense al. torneys present.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Standfacts Credit Services, Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

    405 F. Supp. 2d 1141 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 7, 2005

    Browne Decl. ¶ 9; Leslie Decl. ¶ 6; Malloy Decl. ¶ 8. … Browne Decl. ¶ 13; Malloy Decl. ¶ 8.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.