Case law

Department of Water & Power of Los Angeles v. ABB Power T & D Co.

902 F. Supp. 1178 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 8, 1995

The contract was actually executed by DWP and ABB's predecessor, BBC Brown Boveri, Inc ("BBC"). ABB is an indirect subsidiary of ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. … ABB Ltd. is the result of a 1987 combination of two groups — a Swedish company, ASEA AB, and a Swiss entity, BBC Brown Boveri Ltd. In 1988, ASEA AB and Brown Boveri Ltd.'

United States v. Browne

233 F. Supp. 3d 814 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 10, 2017

Rakas v. … In Terry v.

Braswell Motor Freight, Inc. v. United States

336 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 14, 1971

The Plaintiff carriers opposed the application and the Commission initially denied the application in the order of its Motor Carrier Board on May 25, 1970. … Merchants Delivery Co. v. United States, 265 F.Supp. 669 (W.D. Mo.1967).

Cevallos v. City of Los Angeles

914 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 17, 1996

Kraft v. Jacka, 872 F.2d 862, 866 (9th Cir.1989) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-71 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … Board of Regents, 408 U.S. at 576 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 ; Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Christie, 812 F.2d 1097, 1102 (9th Cir.1987).

Welker v. Cicerone

174 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 27, 2001

Judicial Board members are appointed to two-year terms by the Executive Cabinet. … Such a finding can be appealed to the Judicial Board, which will issue a final, non-appealable ruling. B.

Bunnell v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America

567 F. Supp. 2d 1148 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 22, 2007

Harper v. Wallingford, 877 F.2d 728 (9th Cir.1989). … The Ninth Circuit further elaborated on the definition of “storage” in Theofel v.

Daughtry v. Diamond M Co.

693 F. Supp. 856 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 2, 1988

In Sherrill v. … Opinions have referred to a person working on board a sea going vessel as a "seaman.” E.g., Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire, 477 U.S. 207, 232 , 106 S.Ct. 2485, 2500 , 91 L.Ed.2d 174, 196 (1986).

Negrete v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America

926 F. Supp. 2d 1143 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 25, 2013

(citing United States v. Benny, 786 F.2d 1410, 1416 (9th Cir.1986)); see also River City Markets, Inc. v. … The court relied heavily on Fitzgerald v.

Ribbens International, S.A. De C v. v. Transport International Pool, Inc.

45 F. Supp. 2d 982 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 14, 1999

TIP’s sole authority for its claim of standing is County of Alameda v. State Board of Control, 14 Cal.App.4th 1096 , 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 487 (1993). … In that case, the Court of Appeal held that neither the County of Alameda, a member of its board of supervisors in his official capacity, nor the board member in his County taxpayer capacity had standing to assert the rights

E.H. v. Valley Christian Academy

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 25, 2022

North 4 Haven concerned a challenge by two school boards to Title IX regulations; the school boards 5 contended that the regulations exceeded agency authority because Title IX was not meant to reach 6 the employment … See, e.g., Austin v. Univ. of Oregon, 10 925 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2019) (Title IX claim brought by basketball players brought Title IX 11 claim against university following their expulsion); Brown v.

Castro v. Klinger

274 F. Supp. 870 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 31, 1967

v. … Nelson v. People of State of California, 346 F.2d 73, 77-82 (9th Cir. 1965); Henderson v. Heinze, 349 F.2d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir. 1965); Pembrook v. Wilson, 370 F.2d 37, 39 (9th Cir. 1966); See Kuhl v.

Fortuna Enterprises, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles

673 F. Supp. 2d 1000 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 2008

Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Brown, - U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2408, 2412 , 171 L.Ed.2d 264 (2008). The first is know as Garmon preemption, see San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v. … Bray, 21 Cal.3d 841, 847-48 , 148 Cal.Rptr. 148 , 582 P.2d 604 (1978) (same); Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855, 860 , 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 (1973) (same).

R.S. By & Through His Guardian Ad Litem v. Berryhill

357 F. Supp. 3d 1033 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 2019

Hence, while an ALJ's decision need not be drafted with "ideal clarity," it must, at a minimum, set forth the ALJ's reasoning "in a way that allows for meaningful review." *1037 Brown-Hunter v. … V.

Voight v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

28 F. Supp. 2d 569 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 15, 1998

It also stated that it had had the file reviewed by a board certified family practitioner and board certified psychiatrist, as well as by a Physicians’ Roundtable. … See also Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala., Inc., 898 F.2d 1556, 1569 (11th Cir.1990).

Gutowitz v. Transamerica Life Insurance

126 F. Supp. 3d 1128 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 14, 2015

Edison Co. v. … See Pinson v. U.S.

Gomez v. Astrue

695 F. Supp. 2d 1049 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 10, 2010

Fanning v. … Stedman’s Medical Dictionary retardation (27th ed. 2000); see also Brown v.

Gart v. Logitech, Inc.

254 F. Supp. 2d 1119 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 2003

The Autocom consisted of a hand-piece, a board of sensors with letters on it, electronics attached to the board, and a printing device. … The Autocom system tracked the handpiece as it was moved around the board filled with letters.

Phase II Transportation, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co.

228 F. Supp. 3d 999 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 2017

Industrial Welfare Com., 211 Cal.App.2d 729 , 28 Cal.Rptr. 238 (1963); and Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs’ Assn. v. Board of Retirement, 16 Cal.4th 483 , 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 304 , 940 P.2d 891 (1997)). … Co. v.

Nutratech, Inc. v. Syntech (SSPF) International, Inc.

242 F.R.D. 552 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 20, 2007

Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir.1992). The court may order that the trade secret or commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a designated way. Fed. … Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v.

Lockwood v. The M/S Royal Viking Star

663 F. Supp. 181 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 23, 1986

The Bilyk Court also pointed out that in Tjonaman v. … As Justice Harlan, dissenting in Hellenic Lines Ltd. v.