Case law

United States v. Boyce

38 F. Supp. 3d 1135 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2014

.”); Hansen v. … Brown v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 78 T.C. 215, 224 (Tax Ct.1982).

Hazleton v. Alameida

358 F. Supp. 2d 926 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 2, 2005

Lee, 250 F.3d at 688 (quoting Parrino v. … Lee, 250 F.3d at 688 (citing Fed.R.Evid. 201 and quoting Mack v.

In Re Debtor: Jinzheng Group, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 24, 2025

Plan v. Knoebber, 244 F.3d 691, 696 (9th Cir. 2001), overruled on other grounds by Egelhoff v. Egelhoff ex rel. Breiner, 532 U.S. 141 (2001). … United States v. Hinkson, 585 F.3d 1247, 1262 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc).

Plasencia v. State of California

29 F. Supp. 2d 1145 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 18, 1998

Is Plasencia required to file a claim with the State Board of Control? … .”); Hollimon v.

Tippett v. Nelson

331 F. Supp. 383 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 3, 1971

Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 415-422 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963); Lindsey v. Craven, 427 F.2d 153, 154 (9th Cir. 1970); Davidson v. Klinger, 411 F.2d 746, 747 (9th Cir. 1969). … Lembke v. Field, 380 F.2d 383 (9th Cir. 1967).

Haffke v. California

325 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 1971

Board of Elections of City of New York, 380 F.2d 445, 448 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1048 , 88 S.Ct. 768 , 19 L.Ed.2d 840 (1968); Herald Co. v. Harper, 410 F.2d 125, 128 (8th Cir. 1969); Glisson v. … State of California by and Through Brown, 238 F.Supp. 22, 23 (S.D.Cal.1964).

American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

577 F. Supp. 2d 1110 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 9, 2008

Authority to manage the assets of the port and craft rules governing port-related activities in each city is invested in defendants Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles and Board of Harbor Commissioners … of the City of Long Beach, and Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Long Beach.

Los Angeles Times v. County of Los Angeles

956 F. Supp. 1530 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 12, 1996

In Ripplinger v. … Globe Newspaper Co. v.

Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.

513 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 5, 1981

See, Lockwood v. … Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Weiner, 606 F.2d 864, 868 (9th Cir. 1979); Ross v. International *337 Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 634 F.2d 453, 457 (9th Cir. 1980).

Harel Talasazan v. City of Los Angeles, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 2026

As such, the Board of Bar Overseers and 3 the Office of Bar Counsel are arms of the state. Johnson v. … Brown v.

In Re HOMESTORE.COM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

347 F. Supp. 2d 769 · District Court, C.D. California · May 11, 2004

Paracor Fin., Inc. v. General Elec. … In Burgess v.

Antoinette Fernandez v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 10, 2025

Vestis Services, LLC v. Vestis Services, LLC aka Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC; and Samantha Shaunee Brown v. Western First Aid & Safety; et al. … Vestis Services, LLC v. Vestis Services, LLC aka Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC; and Samantha Shaunee Brown v. Western First Aid & Safety; et al. V.

Stearns v. Estes

504 F. Supp. 998 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 17, 1980

England v. Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 420-23 , 84 S.Ct. 461, 467-68 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964). … Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 165-66 , 94 S.Ct. 1633, 1649-50 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974) (Powell, J., concurring); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Board of Regents v.

Rubio v. Hampton

384 F. Supp. 218 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 29, 1974

Brancadora v. Federal National Mortgage Ass’n., 344 F.2d 933 (9th Cir. 1965); Robinson v. Blount, 472 F.2d 839 (9th Cir. 1973); Seebach v. Cullen, supra. … Arnett v.

National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma v. Unocal, Inc.

176 F.R.D. 329 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 1997

Brown Group, 517 U.S. at-, 116 S.Ct. at 1534 (quoting Hunt v. … Brown Group, 517 U.S. at -, 116 S.Ct. at 1535 (citing Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Allnet Communication Services, Inc., 806 F.2d 1093, 1094-95 (D.C.Cir.1986)).

Lana Ramos v. Vestis Services, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 10, 2025

Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC: Samantha Shaunee Brown v. Western First Aid & Safety; et al. C. Ramos v. … Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC: Samantha Shaunee Brown v. Western First Aid & Safety; et al. V.

Partida v. Union Pacific Railroad

221 F.R.D. 623 · District Court, C.D. California · May 17, 2004

All “minor disputes ... must be adjudicated under RLA mechanisms, which include an employer’s internal dispute-resolution procedures and an adjustment board established by the unions and the employer.” Monroe v. … For example, in Bernal v.

Bianco v. H.F. Ahmanson & Co.

897 F. Supp. 433 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 14, 1995

Ahmanson & Company and its affiliates prohibits entering into employment contracts unless they are in writing and approved by the Board of Directors. … See Gianaculas v.

In re Giz

264 F. Supp. 252 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 8, 1967

As stated by the Supreme Court in Berenyi v. … To further quote from Giz v.

Preservation of Los Olivos v. United States Department of the Interior

635 F. Supp. 2d 1076 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2008

Instead, the Board found that they lacked prudential standing. Purely economic injuries, the Board noted, are not within the zone of interests of NEPA. … the Board is not bound by the case or controversy restriction in Article III of the United States Constitution, applicable to federal courts.” *1093 Citizens for Safety and Environment v.