Case law

Murray B. Marsh Co. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.

326 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 1971

Supreme Court cases of Kelly v. Kosuga, 358 U.S. 516 , 79 S.Ct. 429 , 3 L.Ed.2d 475 (1959) and Bruce’s Juices, Inc., v. … the Board of Directors of this Corporation has created the office of Chairman of the Board, and prescribed that the Chairman of the Board shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and shall have the general

Reese v. Nixon

347 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 1972

This appears to be an oblique reference to the State taxing process as carried out by the Franchise Tax Board, of which Mr. Flournoy is chairman. … In Bivens v.

Eric Shane Silveira v. J. Gastelo

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 23, 2020

See Nettles, 830 F.3d at 934–35; see also, e.g., Brown v. Montgomery, No. 19-cv-2021-CAB(WVG), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146162, at *15–17 (S.D. Cal. … See Nettles, 830 F.3d at 934–35; see also Brown, 2020 U.S. Dist.

Watson Laboratories, Inc. v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc.

178 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2001

Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. … Microsoft Corp., 87 F.Supp.2d 992, 1000 (N.D.Cal.2000) (quoting F.T.C. v. Brown Shoe Co., 384 U.S. 316 , 86 S.Ct. 1501, 1504 , 16 L.Ed.2d 587 (1966)); see also Carter v.

Vallier v. Jet Propulsion Laboratory

120 F. Supp. 2d 887 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 2, 2000

Id.; see also Faber v. … The United States claims that government participation in the Master- Planning Board cannot be equated to detailed control over the JPL workforce’s daily activities. 12 . California Institute of Technology v.

United States v. Wayte

549 F. Supp. 1376 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 15, 1982

In Nixon v. … prosecuted all Chinese who violated the commands of the licensing board.

Oliva v. Hedgpeth

600 F. Supp. 2d 1067 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 9, 2009

Hair black or dark brown.” (R.T. 567). … See Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. at 41-42 , 109 S.Ct. 285 . 15 . Compare Brown v.

Spin Master, Ltd. v. Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC

944 F. Supp. 2d 830 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 2012

Corp. v. … board game.

Perea v. Walgreen Co.

939 F. Supp. 2d 1026 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 11, 2013

Defendant’s argument that the term “honey” is the common or usual name for a product where the pollen’s removal was avoidable is supported by the National Honey Board (the “Board”), which uses the word “honey” without mentioning … When defining “honey” the Board states: “Honey is honey, it’s just that simple.

In Re Burbank Environmental Litigation

42 F. Supp. 2d 976 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 2, 1998

Marlene Hook, an individual; Carmen Lacy, an individual; Jill Thomas, an individual; Mark Thomas, an individual; Jeani Brown, an individual; Millard Brown, an individual; Marion Flatt, an individual; Wayne Flatt, an individual … Durfey v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours Co., 59 F.3d 121, 125 (9th Cir. 1995); Hanford Downwinders Coalition, Inc. v. Dowdle, 71 F.3d 1469, 1477 (9th Cir.1995).

In Re Savage

329 F. Supp. 968 · District Court, C.D. California · May 17, 1971

The district court found jurisdiction under Local Loan Co. v. … act for and on behalf of the State Board of Equalization be, and each of them are, hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from taking any action to collect said tax.”

Craft v. County of San Bernardino

468 F. Supp. 2d 1172 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 7, 2006

See Brown Depo. at 28, 33; Fonzi Depo. at 33, 36; Tanguay Depo. at 34-35. … Ward v.

Gingrich v. Oberhauser

305 F. Supp. 738 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 7, 1969

Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 317 , 83 S.Ct. 745 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1962); Fay v. … BROWN (Deputy District Attorney) : Mr.

City of Los Angeles v. County of Kern

462 F. Supp. 2d 1105 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 20, 2006

Board of County Commissioners of County of Rogers, 27 F.3d 1499, 1506-07 (10th Cir.1994)); cf. Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. … Price v.

Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp. v. Oceanbridge Shipping International, Inc.

48 F. Supp. 2d 1049 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 1999

SPM Corp. v. M/V MING MOON, 22 F.3d 523 (3rd Cir. 1994). … The Oceanbridge Containers first arrived in Hong Kong on board the BROOKLYN BRIDGE, and were subsequently shipped from Hong Kong to Tokyo on board the M/V MING SOUTH, Voyage No. 719E. 8 .

United States v. Boyce

38 F. Supp. 3d 1135 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 8, 2014

.”); Hansen v. … Brown v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 78 T.C. 215, 224 (Tax Ct.1982).

Miller v. Thane International, Inc.

372 F. Supp. 2d 1198 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 2, 2005

In TSC Industries, Inc. v. … Unger v. Amedisys Inc., 401 F.3d 316, 320 (5th Cir. 2005). In discharging their duties, many courts have looked to the factors enumerated in Cammer v. Bloom, 711 F.Supp. 1264, 1286-87 (D.N.J.1989).

Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.

214 F. Supp. 3d 877 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 11, 2016

Fla. 2012); (7) Steven Helfand, 8 see Brown v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc., 2016 WL 631880 , *9-10 (N.D. Cal. 2016); and (8) Joseph Darrell Palmer, see Dennis v. Kellogg Co., 2013 WL 6055326 , *4 n. 2 (S.D. Cal. 2013). … See, e.g., Welch, 480 F.3d at 948-49 (affirming district court’s 20% across-the-board reduction for quarter-hour billing); Benihana of Tokyo, LLC v. Angelo, Gordon & Co., 2015 WL 5439357 , *7 (D.

In Re HOMESTORE.COM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

347 F. Supp. 2d 769 · District Court, C.D. California · May 11, 2004

Paracor Fin., Inc. v. General Elec. … In Burgess v.

Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.

990 F. Supp. 1188 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 4, 1997

In Jordan v. … The Cologne Water Quality Act, California Water Code Sections 13,000 et seq., established the California State Water Resources Control Board *1197 and the system of nine regional water quality control boards.