Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

0.48s

  • California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Stores Co.

    697 F. Supp. 1125 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 1988

    Benda v. … RSR, 602 F.2d at 1323 , quoting Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 336-37 , 82 S.Ct. at 1529-30 .

    Reversed on other grounds by State of California v. American Stores Co. Alpha Beta Acquisition Corp. Lucky Stores, Inc., 872 F.2d 837 (1989)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Harris v. United States Department of Justice

    322 F. Supp. 1158 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 1971

    . § 4205 which provides : “A warrant for the retaking of any United States prisoner who has violated his parole, may be issued only by the Board of Parole or a member thereof and within the maximum term or terms for which … Willis v. Meier, 435 F.2d 852 (9th Cir. 1970); Van Buskirk v. Wilkinson, 216 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1954). Therefore, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus be, and the same is, denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • California Republican Party v. Mercier

    652 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 1986

    Young v. Board of Education of Fremont School District, 416 F.Supp. 1139, 1141 (D.Colo.1976); Salveson v. … See Brown v. Pitchess, 13 Cal.3d 518 , 119 Cal.Rptr. 204 , 531 P.2d 772 (1975). 8 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Yagman v. Republic Insurance

    91 Daily Journal DAR 8162 · District Court, C.D. California · May 31, 1991

    At that point, instead of complying with the Circuit’s command to reassign the sanctions issue, Judge Real ordered the parties to Brown v. Baden (i.e. … Instead, he relied on obfuscation, switching the facts of Brown v. Baden with those of Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, United States District Court for Central District of California v. Stephen Yagman.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. United States

    911 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 27, 1995

    Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), was another 9-0 decision, and yet, it was obviously a new rule, given that it overruled Plessy v. … Brown, 347 U.S. at 494-95 , 74 S.Ct. at 691-92 . Nor was Austin dictated by Halper. Halper provided a new framework for determining whether a given sanction constitutes punishment or remediation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Novalogic, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard

    41 F. Supp. 3d 885 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 2013

    Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc., 2009 WL 8763151 (C.D.Cal. Sept. 23, 2009). … Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc. is currently on appeal to the Ninth Circuit. The Brown case was consolidated with Keller v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mendoza v. Apfel

    88 F. Supp. 2d 1108 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2000

    Smolen, 80 F.3d at 1288 ; Higbee v. Sullivan, 975 F.2d 558, 561 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam); Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir.1983). … See Ghant v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Chuidian v. Philippine National Bank

    734 F. Supp. 415 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 9, 1990

    .”); Wohl v. … See, Lapin v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Homeowners Emergency Life Protection Committee v. Lynn

    388 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 30, 1974

    of Water and Power Commissioners, and the President of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners. … Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp., 321 F.Supp. 923, 930 (N.D.Cal.1970); Coffee Dan’s, Inc. v. Coffee Don’s Charcoal Broiler, 305 F.Supp. 1210, 1213 (N.D.Cal.1969). See King v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Public Employees' Retirement System v. Stanley

    605 F. Supp. 2d 1073 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 6, 2009

    Gould v. Nat’l Life Ins. … Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 40 (2d Cir.1993) (internal citation and quotation omitted).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Standing Committee on Discipline v. Yagman

    856 F. Supp. 1384 · District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 1994

    See, e.g., Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, 482 U.S. 569 , 107 S.Ct. 2568 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987). … Moreover, the Panel notes that given the disqualification of Chief Judge Real in Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. DeLorean

    561 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 22, 1983

    The AP, relying primarily upon Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 , 100 S.Ct. 2814 , 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980) and U.S. v. … In extending a first amendment right of access to voir dire, Chief Judge Browning, quoting from the recent Supreme Court decision in Globe Newspaper Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nodleman v. Aero Mexico

    528 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 10, 1981

    Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, 461 F.Supp. 99 (E.D.N.Y.1978) (available procedures provided inadequate remedy for Section 504 claim); see also Rosado v. … Board of Higher Educ., 461 F.Supp. 99 (E.D.N.Y.1978); Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America, 451 F.Supp. 7 (E.D.Mich.1977); Cruz, 84 F.R.D. 307 (D.P.R.1979); see also Larry P. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc.

    232 F. Supp. 2d 1092 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 20, 2002

    (“the Access Board”) pursuant to the ADA. … In this language, the Board uses “inferior lines of sight” to refer to uncomfortable viewing angles, not just to obstructions. AMC also relies on Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America v.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc., 549 F.3d 760 (2008)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Siebert v. Standard Insurance Co. Group Long-Term Disability Policy

    220 F. Supp. 2d 1128 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 9, 2002

    (citing Brown v. … Clark v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Franco-Gonzales v. Holder

    828 F. Supp. 2d 1133 · District Court, C.D. California · May 4, 2011

    Diouf v. Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2011). … U.S. v. Ramos, 623 F.3d 672, 682 (9th Cir.2010).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Outpost Development Corp.

    369 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 1973

    Board as to whether the activity complained of in fact constitutes an illegal activity. … United States v. Baren, 305 F.2d 527, 533 (2d Cir. 1962); Linden v. United States, 254 F.2d 560, 566 (4th Cir. 1958).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sherman v. City of Pasadena

    367 F. Supp. 1115 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 1973

    The Review Board recommended that plaintiff be restored to his employment with the City. 10. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) or Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

    District Court, C.D. California · Nov 17, 2023

    CV 23-8708 FMO (SKx) Date November 17, 2023 Title Board of Trustees Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund v. … P. 4 & 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Bakshinian

    65 F. Supp. 2d 1104 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 7, 1999

    In that case, defendant DeLoach and codefendant Brown were indicted together on various charges. See id. at 1002-3 . Brown had earlier been tried on related charges. See id. … See e.g., Huey v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.