Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
0.48s
California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Stores Co.
697 F. Supp. 1125 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 1988
Benda v. … RSR, 602 F.2d at 1323 , quoting Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 336-37 , 82 S.Ct. at 1529-30 .
Reversed on other grounds by State of California v. American Stores Co. Alpha Beta Acquisition Corp. Lucky Stores, Inc., 872 F.2d 837 (1989)Cited 8 timesPublishedHarris v. United States Department of Justice
322 F. Supp. 1158 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 1971
. § 4205 which provides : “A warrant for the retaking of any United States prisoner who has violated his parole, may be issued only by the Board of Parole or a member thereof and within the maximum term or terms for which … Willis v. Meier, 435 F.2d 852 (9th Cir. 1970); Van Buskirk v. Wilkinson, 216 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1954). Therefore, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus be, and the same is, denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Republican Party v. Mercier
652 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 1986
Young v. Board of Education of Fremont School District, 416 F.Supp. 1139, 1141 (D.Colo.1976); Salveson v. … See Brown v. Pitchess, 13 Cal.3d 518 , 119 Cal.Rptr. 204 , 531 P.2d 772 (1975). 8 .
Cited 17 timesPublished91 Daily Journal DAR 8162 · District Court, C.D. California · May 31, 1991
At that point, instead of complying with the Circuit’s command to reassign the sanctions issue, Judge Real ordered the parties to Brown v. Baden (i.e. … Instead, he relied on obfuscation, switching the facts of Brown v. Baden with those of Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, United States District Court for Central District of California v. Stephen Yagman.
Cited 3 timesPublished911 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 27, 1995
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), was another 9-0 decision, and yet, it was obviously a new rule, given that it overruled Plessy v. … Brown, 347 U.S. at 494-95 , 74 S.Ct. at 691-92 . Nor was Austin dictated by Halper. Halper provided a new framework for determining whether a given sanction constitutes punishment or remediation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNovalogic, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard
41 F. Supp. 3d 885 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 2013
Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc., 2009 WL 8763151 (C.D.Cal. Sept. 23, 2009). … Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc. is currently on appeal to the Ninth Circuit. The Brown case was consolidated with Keller v.
Cited 11 timesPublished88 F. Supp. 2d 1108 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2000
Smolen, 80 F.3d at 1288 ; Higbee v. Sullivan, 975 F.2d 558, 561 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam); Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir.1983). … See Ghant v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedChuidian v. Philippine National Bank
734 F. Supp. 415 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 9, 1990
.”); Wohl v. … See, Lapin v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHomeowners Emergency Life Protection Committee v. Lynn
388 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 30, 1974
of Water and Power Commissioners, and the President of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners. … Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp., 321 F.Supp. 923, 930 (N.D.Cal.1970); Coffee Dan’s, Inc. v. Coffee Don’s Charcoal Broiler, 305 F.Supp. 1210, 1213 (N.D.Cal.1969). See King v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPublic Employees' Retirement System v. Stanley
605 F. Supp. 2d 1073 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 6, 2009
Gould v. Nat’l Life Ins. … Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 40 (2d Cir.1993) (internal citation and quotation omitted).
Cited 7 timesPublishedStanding Committee on Discipline v. Yagman
856 F. Supp. 1384 · District Court, C.D. California · May 18, 1994
See, e.g., Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, 482 U.S. 569 , 107 S.Ct. 2568 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987). … Moreover, the Panel notes that given the disqualification of Chief Judge Real in Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublished561 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 22, 1983
The AP, relying primarily upon Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 , 100 S.Ct. 2814 , 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980) and U.S. v. … In extending a first amendment right of access to voir dire, Chief Judge Browning, quoting from the recent Supreme Court decision in Globe Newspaper Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished528 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 10, 1981
Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, 461 F.Supp. 99 (E.D.N.Y.1978) (available procedures provided inadequate remedy for Section 504 claim); see also Rosado v. … Board of Higher Educ., 461 F.Supp. 99 (E.D.N.Y.1978); Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America, 451 F.Supp. 7 (E.D.Mich.1977); Cruz, 84 F.R.D. 307 (D.P.R.1979); see also Larry P. v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedUnited States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc.
232 F. Supp. 2d 1092 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 20, 2002
(“the Access Board”) pursuant to the ADA. … In this language, the Board uses “inferior lines of sight” to refer to uncomfortable viewing angles, not just to obstructions. AMC also relies on Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America v.
Reversed on other grounds by United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc., 549 F.3d 760 (2008)Cited 12 timesPublishedSiebert v. Standard Insurance Co. Group Long-Term Disability Policy
220 F. Supp. 2d 1128 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 9, 2002
(citing Brown v. … Clark v.
Cited 2 timesPublished828 F. Supp. 2d 1133 · District Court, C.D. California · May 4, 2011
Diouf v. Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2011). … U.S. v. Ramos, 623 F.3d 672, 682 (9th Cir.2010).
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States v. Outpost Development Corp.
369 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 1973
Board as to whether the activity complained of in fact constitutes an illegal activity. … United States v. Baren, 305 F.2d 527, 533 (2d Cir. 1962); Linden v. United States, 254 F.2d 560, 566 (4th Cir. 1958).
Cited 7 timesPublished367 F. Supp. 1115 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 1973
The Review Board recommended that plaintiff be restored to his employment with the City. 10. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) or Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · Nov 17, 2023
CV 23-8708 FMO (SKx) Date November 17, 2023 Title Board of Trustees Teamsters Miscellaneous Security Trust Fund v. … P. 4 & 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R.
Cited 0 timesUnknown65 F. Supp. 2d 1104 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 7, 1999
In that case, defendant DeLoach and codefendant Brown were indicted together on various charges. See id. at 1002-3 . Brown had earlier been tried on related charges. See id. … See e.g., Huey v.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna