Case law

In Re Bankamerica Securities Litigation

636 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 10, 1986

Compare Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 785 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982) (applying state law) with Greenspun v. Del E. … Under the leading Delaware case of Aronson v.

In re American Apparel, Inc.

855 F. Supp. 2d 1043 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 13, 2012

. 22 On May 12, 2010, Capps resigned from the Board, but remained as Board Observer. 23 On March 30, 2011, Capps resigned as Board Observer, and Lea and Richardson resigned from the board, all citing “conflicts of interest … Silicon Graphics, 188 F.3d at 993 (Browning, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (quoting 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-5(c)(l)(B), 77z-2(c)(1)(B)); Alaska Elec. Pension Fund v.

Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley College

883 F. Supp. 1407 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 14, 1995

Nicholson v. Board of Educ., 682 F.2d 858, 865 (9th Cir.1982). … This case may thus be distinguished from Doe v. University of Michigan and UWM Post, Inc. v. Board of Regents. IV.

Leftwich v. Jett

453 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 1978

Appeal to the National Parole Commission Appeals Board pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4215 (b) and 28 C.F.R. § 2.26 . … See also Coronado v. United States Board of Parole, 551 F.2d 275 (10th Cir. 1977).

Kaufman v. Chubb Ltd.

386 F. Supp. 3d 1270 · District Court, C.D. California · May 3, 2019

Under the director's liability exception there is no coverage for "any damages for any covered person's actions or failure to act as an officer or member of a board of directors of any corporation or organization." … In order to be considered "a publication," the false statement must be made to at least one person other than the defamed. *1276 Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal., Inc. , 68 Cal.

Scotti v. Los Robles Regional Center

117 F. Supp. 2d 982 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 29, 2000

Distributors v. … See Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 23-24 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). The doctrine is limited but does apply to state law claims preempted by ERISA.

Galen v. County of Los Angeles

322 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 2004

Again in Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County v. … Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Artukovic v. Rison

628 F. Supp. 1370 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 6, 1986

This matter is before the court upon a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the nature of a review of the decision of Magistrate Volney V. Brown, Jr., ordering extradition of petitioner to Yugoslavia to answer charges of murder. … AMENDED OPINION August 8, 1985 VOLNEY V. BROWN, Jr., United States Magistrate.

Michael Bernard Potere v. The Board of Trustees of the State Bar of California

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 12, 2022

See Bates v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 511 F.3d 974, 26 985 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting O’Shea v. … See Commc’ns Telesystems Int’l v. Cal. Pub.

Bryant v. Oxxford Express, Inc.

181 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 5, 2000

Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc., 946 F.2d 622 (9th Cir.1991); Decker Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 805 F.2d 834, 843 (9th Cir.1986). Guthy-Renker Fitness, L.L.C. v. … Northwest Airlines, Inc. v.

California v. Luros

332 F. Supp. 1049 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 28, 1970

People v. Sun Era, Inc., et al, No. Cr. A-5818. … Brown DAVID M. BROWN Attorney for Petitioner *1053 *1054 *1055 . The State Complaint is an exhibit to the Petition for Removal, and both are attached hereto as an Appendix.

Gibson v. County of Riverside

181 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 4, 2002

See Town of Northborough v. Collins, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 978 , 653 N.E.2d 598 (Mass.1995); Colony Cove Assoc. v. Brown, 220 Cal.App.3d 195 , 269 Cal.Rptr. 234 (1990). … The County also cites Colony Cove Assoc, v. Brown, 220 Cal.App.3d 195 , 269 Cal.Rptr. 234 (1990), for the proposition that a blanket 55-or-older policy is permissible under the Unruh Act.

Ossur hf v. Manamed Inc.

331 F. Supp. 3d 1005 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2017

James V. Selna, District Judge Plaintiffs Ossur hf and Ossur Americas Inc. (collectively, "Ossur"), moved for a preliminary injunction. Mot., Docket No. 11-1. Defendants Manamed Inc. … Because "brown ale" is a traditional category of ales, "honey brown" merely described a subcategory-"brown ales made with honey." Id. at 149 .

Root v. Schenk

953 F. Supp. 1115 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 21, 1997

Co. v. … were so employed, that the Board was comprised solely of private practitioners, and that success in the Board’s efforts would possibly redound to the personal benefit of members of the Board.

Riley v. Tokola Offshore, Inc.

626 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 1985

Under Allis v. Chalmers they are all shielded from such contingencies. … The “substantial State interest” exception to preemption Alternatively, Tokola quotes Farmer v.

Palm Springs Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Desert Hospital

628 F. Supp. 454 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 9, 1986

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). See Senate Rep., reprinted in [July-Dec.] Antitrust & Trade Reg.Rep. … San Mateo-Burlingame Board of Realtors, 724 F.2d 1347, 1350 (9th Cir.1983); Dimidowich v. Bell & Howell, 590 F.Supp. 45, 48-49 (E.D.Cal.1984); Rosack v.

Burkow v. City of Los Angeles

119 F. Supp. 2d 1076 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 2000

City of Cincinnati v. … See S.O.C., Inc. v.

Klvana v. State of Cal.

911 F. Supp. 1288 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 1995

From 1980-83, petitioner was on probationary status with the California Medical Board (hereafter Board, then known as the Board of Medical Quality Assurance) as a result of his misdemeanor convictions of 26 counts of prescribing … See also Justus v.

California v. Bournemouth

318 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 1970

At the time he boarded the ship he did not notice any oil in the water near the ship. … In support of this proposition, counsel cites Sweeney v. *842 Erving, 228 U.S. 233 , 33 S.Ct. 416 , 57 L.Ed. 815 (1913), and Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 46 , 68 S.Ct. 391 (1948).

Disney v. United States

267 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, C.D. California · May 3, 1967

A strikingly parallel instance arises in the case of Warwick v. … The recent case of McDonell v. Commissioner, CCH Tax Ct.Rep. Tax Ct.