Case law

United States v. Pritchard

993 F. Supp. 2d 1203 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 30, 2014

(alterations in original) (quoting Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 942 (9th Cir.2007)). … In Crawford v.

Zavala v. BARNIK

545 F. Supp. 2d 1051 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 8, 2008

Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1982). A trial court may dismiss a claim upon motion of the defendant or sua sponte pursuant to F.R.C.P. … Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d at 268 . As also noted above, a one-time incidence of verbal harassment of a prisoner does not violate the Eighth Amendment. See Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d at 1171 ; Keenan v.

United States v. Ortiz

714 F. Supp. 1569 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 1989

Accordingly, they argue that pursuant to United States v. Davis, supra, airport screenings are valid “only if they recognize the right of the person to avoid searches by electing not to board the aircraft.” … the airplane before placing their suitcase on board.

Mandel v. Hutchinson

336 F. Supp. 772 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 21, 1971

City of Long Beach v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, 50 Cal.2d 674 , 328 P.2d 964 (1958). … Cockerell, 161 F.2d 163 (4th Cir. 1947) ; a suit to require a board of assessors to specifically perform an agreement to abate taxes, Lawrence Print Works, Inc. v.

Kadomatsu v. Superior Court

503 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 1980

Justice Rehnquist issued an opinion in his capacity as Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit in Board of Education of City of Los Angeles v. … Crawford v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.3d 280 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 551 P.2d 28 (1976); the recent decisions by Justice Rehnquist and the California Supreme Court, supra; Sierra Club v.

Angley v. UTI Worldwide Inc.

311 F. Supp. 3d 1117 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 19, 2018

Binder v. … Defendants rely solely on Brown v. China Integrated Energy, Inc., 2014 WL 12576643 (C.D. Cal. 2014), in support of their contention.

Chapman v. United States

314 F. Supp. 549 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 5, 1970

International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union v. Kuntz, 9 Cir., 334 F.2d 165 , 169, n. 5.” See also Gifford v. Travelers Protective Assn. (9 Cir. 1946), 153 F.2d 209 ; Byrnes v. … See Elliott v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, D.C., 233 F. Supp. 578 for the court’s opinion.

Mangels v. City of Orange

678 F. Supp. 1452 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 22, 1988

Such rules apply in actions brought under section 1983, Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 486-87 , 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1796-97 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980), and section 1986, Donoghue v. … Patsy v. Florida Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496, 504 , 102 S.Ct. 2557, 2561 , 73 L.Ed. 2d 172, 180 (1982).

Mays v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

354 F. Supp. 3d 1136 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 29, 2019

Brown , 705 F. App'x at 645 . … See also Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co. , 28 Cal.

City of Los Angeles v. United States

355 F. Supp. 461 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 1972

In Ayers v. … Leslie Miller, Inc. v. Arkansas, 352 U.S. 187 , 77 S.Ct. 257 , 1 L.Ed.2d 231 ; Johnson v. Maryland, 254 U.S. 51, 55-57 , 41 S.Ct. 16 , 65 L.Ed. 126 ; Paul v.

Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley College

883 F. Supp. 1407 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 14, 1995

Nicholson v. Board of Educ., 682 F.2d 858, 865 (9th Cir.1982). … This case may thus be distinguished from Doe v. University of Michigan and UWM Post, Inc. v. Board of Regents. IV.

Barantsevich v. VTB Bank

954 F. Supp. 2d 972 · District Court, C.D. California · May 29, 2013

for approval. 36 Plaintiff followed Zuzin’s instructions, wiring the funds as requested and presenting the expenses to the Zao Labs board. 37 The board did not question the Vestax and Bigland transfers. 38 In early 2009, … Calvert v.

Cherry v. United States

264 F. Supp. 969 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 3, 1967

Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 572 , 85 S.Ct. 1162 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965); Hanover Bank, Executor v. Commissioner, 369 U.S. 672, 687 , 82 S.Ct. 1080 , 8 L.Ed.2d 187 (1962) ; Samson Tire & Rubber Corp. v. … See: Boss v. United States, 290 F. 167 (9th Cir. 1923); W. S. Dudley v. Commissioner, 15 B.T.A. 570 (1929); J. T. S. Brown’s Son Company v. Commissioner, 10 T.C. 840 (1948); Gaines v. Commissioner, par. 53,157 P-H Memo.

Quinteros v. Hernandez

419 F. Supp. 2d 1209 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 2006

Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 12 , 99 S.Ct. at 2106 ; Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 377-78 , 107 S.Ct. 2415, 2420-21 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987); McQuillion v. … The Parole Board’s decision and findings were proper. Lodgment, Exh. L at 283-84. “The Board of Prison Terms enjoys broad discretion in parole-related decisions.

Toxic Injuries Corp. v. Safety-Kleen Corp.

57 F. Supp. 2d 947 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 28, 1999

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. … United Food and Commercial Workers v. Brown Group, 517 U.S. 544, 551 , 116 S.Ct. 1529, 1534 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). Plaintiff claims that neither the first nor third requirements are satisfied in this case.

OPTICAL DISC CORP. v. Del Mar Avionics

275 F. Supp. 2d 1087 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2001

An informative case on this issue is Chemcast Corp. v. Arco Indust. … See Acme Resin Corp. v.

Gibson v. County of Riverside

181 F. Supp. 2d 1057 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 4, 2002

See Town of Northborough v. Collins, 38 Mass.App.Ct. 978 , 653 N.E.2d 598 (Mass.1995); Colony Cove Assoc. v. Brown, 220 Cal.App.3d 195 , 269 Cal.Rptr. 234 (1990). … The County also cites Colony Cove Assoc, v. Brown, 220 Cal.App.3d 195 , 269 Cal.Rptr. 234 (1990), for the proposition that a blanket 55-or-older policy is permissible under the Unruh Act.

Wesley Jessen Corp. v. COOPERVISION, INC.

233 F. Supp. 2d 1233 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 20, 2002

Laitram Corp. v. Rexnord, Inc., 939 F.2d 1533, 1535 (Fed.Cir.1991). … Coopervision’s lenses are made in aqua, blue, gray, hazel, green and brown. (Shull Deck, Ex. E at 81-83). The lenses are sold in the United States in all colors except brown. (Id. at 83). 8 . Docket No. 87.

Flores v. Stock

715 F. Supp. 1468 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 6, 1989

In Goldberg v. … See Ford v.

Northrop University v. Harper

580 F. Supp. 959 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 18, 1983

Judicial review of agency action is precluded in “those rare instances where ‘statutes are drawn in such broad terms that in a given case there is no law to apply.’ ” Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. … Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 403, 410 , 91 S.Ct. 814, 817, 820 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971); Arizona Power Pooling Association v.