Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

1.41s

  • Bassiri v. Xerox Corp.

    292 F. Supp. 2d 1212 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 10, 2003

    Brown’s disdain. Mr. Brown expressed to Plaintiff his dislike of Iran and Iranians. Mr. Brown began a perpetual habit of rebuffing, degrading and criticizing Plaintiff without provocation or justification. … In Christensen v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Bassiri v. Xerox Corp., 463 F.3d 927 (2006)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rosenkrantz v. Marshall

    444 F. Supp. 2d 1063 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 1, 2006

    Inmates of Nebraska Penal, 442 U.S. 1, 7 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979) and Board of Pardons v. … Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) (denial of admission to bar); United States ex rel. Vajtauer v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Morris v. Parke, Davis & Co.

    667 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 1987

    However, Kearl was totally rejected by a court in the same appellate district in Brown v. … Defendants have brought the decision in Brown v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Federal Trade Commission v. Crittenden

    823 F. Supp. 705 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 1993

    ORDER GRANTING IRS’ MOTION TO DISALLOW RECEIVER’S INTENDED DISTRIBUTION TO FRANCHISE TAX BOARD DAVIES, District Judge. … The Franchise Tax Board did not file a written response to the IRS’ motion.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Younger

    281 F. Supp. 507 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 1968

    Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 601 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 682-683 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629, 639 (1967). … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943).

    Reversed by Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan v. March On Productions, Inc.

    District Court, C.D. California · Oct 29, 2019

    INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On July 9, 2019, plaintiffs Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan, and Board of … See Compl. §§ 16-17; Dkt 12-2, Declaration of Chris Tashchyan (“Tashchyan Decl.”) §] 12-14; 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g); Boards of Directors of Motion Picture Indus. Pension Plan v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gabel v. Hughes Air Corp.

    350 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 1972

    Deitrick v. Greaney, 309 U.S. 190, 200-201 , 60 S.Ct. 480, 484, 485 , 84 L.Ed. [694;] 1036; Board of Com’rs of Jackson County v. United States, 308 U.S. 343 , 60 S.Ct. 285 , 84 L.Ed. 313 ; Sola Electric Co. v. … Moragne v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Redken Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol Incorporated

    350 F. Supp. 1301 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 15, 1972

    This refusal was upheld by the Board. 158 U.S.P.Q. 471 . … The Board cited Standard International Corporation v. American Sponge and Chamois Company, Inc., 157 U.S.P.Q. 630 and La Maur, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 146 U.S.P.Q. 654 as authorities for its conclusions.

    Modified by Redken Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol, Incorporated, 501 F.2d 1403 (1974)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gallardo v. DiCarlo

    203 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2002

    Government Claims Board (formerly State Board of Control) (“Board”) within six months after the accrual of the cause of action. … However, DiCarlo has submitted a declaration from the Custodian of Records for the Board stating that Gallardo never filed a claim with the Board as to the March 24, 2000, incident.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • UL LLC v. Space Chariot Inc.

    250 F. Supp. 3d 596 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2017

    Furthermore; both Walker and Mortel promoted Space Chariot hover-boards via their personal social media accounts. SUF at no. 15. … See Octane Fitness, LLC v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Case-Swayne Co., Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.

    355 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, C.D. California · May 6, 1971

    The various District Boards in turn selected representatives to a larger Executive Board which regulated and prorated sales from the several districts. … Sunkist Growers, Inc. is an outgrowth of the informal Boards of Exchange and Executive Board organized in Southern California in 1893.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Silverton v. Department of the Treasury

    449 F. Supp. 1004 · District Court, C.D. California · May 5, 1978

    Shipp v. Todd, 568 F.2d 133 (9th Cir. 1978). 2. … Vogel v. Torrance Board of Education, 447 F.Supp. 258 (C.D.Cal.1978); League of Academic Women v. Regents, 343 F.Supp. 636 (N.D.Cal.1972). 4.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cable v. Department of Developmental Services

    973 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 15, 1997

    (citing United States v. Board of Comm’rs of Sheffield, Alabama, 435 U.S. 110, 134 , 98 S.Ct. 965, 980-81 , 55 L.Ed.2d 148 (1978)). … Board of Regents, 916 F.Supp. 1005 , (S.D.Cal.1995) (dismissing ADA claims against an individual).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. Regents of the University of California

    353 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 1973

    Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, at 601 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972) ; Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, at 571 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). 6 . … We have rejected this approach in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, at 575, n. 14 , 92 S.Ct., at 2708.” Perry v. Sinderraann, supra, 408 U.S., at 599, n. 5, 92 S.Ct., at 2698. 7 . Board of Regents v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Nguyen v. Radient Pharmaceuticals Corp.

    946 F. Supp. 2d 1025 · District Court, C.D. California · May 17, 2013

    Hollinger v. Titan Capital Corp., 914 F.2d 1564, 1569 (9th Cir.1990). A corporation’s scienter is shown by showing scienter for its officers or directors. Brown v. … Vucinich v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Professional Towing, LLC v. The City of Orange

    District Court, C.D. California · Aug 22, 2023

    Royal Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Control, 99 Cal. 16 App. 3d 788, 794 (1979). … Carrancho v. California Air Resources 14 Board, 111 Cal. App. 4th 1255, 1265 (2003). 15 3. Analysis. 16 a.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mirenda v. Ulibarri

    351 F. Supp. 676 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 1972

    See United States v. Stephens, 449 F.2d 103 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Pregerson, 448 F.2d 404 (9th Cir. 1971). … The Policy Statement of the Parole Board means merely that the Board will honor sentences validly imposed after May 1, 1971, granting the possibility of parole for crimes committed before that date.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Regents of University of California v. Shalala

    872 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 6, 1994

    Board”) denying it certain cost reimbursements under the Medicare program. … See Vlandis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kaisaki v. Superior Court

    581 F. Supp. 753 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 1980

    Justice Rehnquist issued an opinion in his capacity as Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit in Board of Education of City of Los Angeles v. … Crawford v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.3d 280 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 551 P.2d 28 (1976); the recent decisions of Justice Rehnquist and the California Supreme Court, supra; Sierra Club v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gipson v. Kajima Engineering & Construction, Inc.

    972 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 1997

    [and] do not become seamen because they happen to be working on board a vessel when they are injured.” Id. … See Cabral v. Healy Tibbits Builders, 1995 A.M.C. 2099 , 1995 WL 510326 (D.Haw.1995) (discussed above); Browning v. B.F. Diamond Const. Co.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.