Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,084 results
1.41s
292 F. Supp. 2d 1212 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 10, 2003
Brown’s disdain. Mr. Brown expressed to Plaintiff his dislike of Iran and Iranians. Mr. Brown began a perpetual habit of rebuffing, degrading and criticizing Plaintiff without provocation or justification. … In Christensen v.
Reversed on other grounds by Bassiri v. Xerox Corp., 463 F.3d 927 (2006)Cited 4 timesPublished444 F. Supp. 2d 1063 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 1, 2006
Inmates of Nebraska Penal, 442 U.S. 1, 7 , 99 S.Ct. 2100 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979) and Board of Pardons v. … Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) (denial of admission to bar); United States ex rel. Vajtauer v.
Cited 17 timesPublished667 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 1987
However, Kearl was totally rejected by a court in the same appellate district in Brown v. … Defendants have brought the decision in Brown v.
Cited 33 timesPublishedFederal Trade Commission v. Crittenden
823 F. Supp. 705 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 16, 1993
ORDER GRANTING IRS’ MOTION TO DISALLOW RECEIVER’S INTENDED DISTRIBUTION TO FRANCHISE TAX BOARD DAVIES, District Judge. … The Franchise Tax Board did not file a written response to the IRS’ motion.
Cited 3 timesPublished281 F. Supp. 507 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 1968
Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 601 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 682-683 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629, 639 (1967). … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943).
Reversed by Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)Cited 18 timesPublishedBoard of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan v. March On Productions, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 29, 2019
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On July 9, 2019, plaintiffs Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan, and Board of … See Compl. §§ 16-17; Dkt 12-2, Declaration of Chris Tashchyan (“Tashchyan Decl.”) §] 12-14; 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g); Boards of Directors of Motion Picture Indus. Pension Plan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown350 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 1972
Deitrick v. Greaney, 309 U.S. 190, 200-201 , 60 S.Ct. 480, 484, 485 , 84 L.Ed. [694;] 1036; Board of Com’rs of Jackson County v. United States, 308 U.S. 343 , 60 S.Ct. 285 , 84 L.Ed. 313 ; Sola Electric Co. v. … Moragne v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedRedken Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol Incorporated
350 F. Supp. 1301 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 15, 1972
This refusal was upheld by the Board. 158 U.S.P.Q. 471 . … The Board cited Standard International Corporation v. American Sponge and Chamois Company, Inc., 157 U.S.P.Q. 630 and La Maur, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc., 146 U.S.P.Q. 654 as authorities for its conclusions.
Modified by Redken Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol, Incorporated, 501 F.2d 1403 (1974)Cited 2 timesPublished203 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2002
Government Claims Board (formerly State Board of Control) (“Board”) within six months after the accrual of the cause of action. … However, DiCarlo has submitted a declaration from the Custodian of Records for the Board stating that Gallardo never filed a claim with the Board as to the March 24, 2000, incident.
Cited 19 timesPublished250 F. Supp. 3d 596 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 20, 2017
Furthermore; both Walker and Mortel promoted Space Chariot hover-boards via their personal social media accounts. SUF at no. 15. … See Octane Fitness, LLC v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCase-Swayne Co., Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.
355 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, C.D. California · May 6, 1971
The various District Boards in turn selected representatives to a larger Executive Board which regulated and prorated sales from the several districts. … Sunkist Growers, Inc. is an outgrowth of the informal Boards of Exchange and Executive Board organized in Southern California in 1893.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSilverton v. Department of the Treasury
449 F. Supp. 1004 · District Court, C.D. California · May 5, 1978
Shipp v. Todd, 568 F.2d 133 (9th Cir. 1978). 2. … Vogel v. Torrance Board of Education, 447 F.Supp. 258 (C.D.Cal.1978); League of Academic Women v. Regents, 343 F.Supp. 636 (N.D.Cal.1972). 4.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCable v. Department of Developmental Services
973 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 15, 1997
(citing United States v. Board of Comm’rs of Sheffield, Alabama, 435 U.S. 110, 134 , 98 S.Ct. 965, 980-81 , 55 L.Ed.2d 148 (1978)). … Board of Regents, 916 F.Supp. 1005 , (S.D.Cal.1995) (dismissing ADA claims against an individual).
Cited 18 timesPublishedPerkins v. Regents of the University of California
353 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 19, 1973
Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, at 601 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972) ; Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, at 571 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). 6 . … We have rejected this approach in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, at 575, n. 14 , 92 S.Ct., at 2708.” Perry v. Sinderraann, supra, 408 U.S., at 599, n. 5, 92 S.Ct., at 2698. 7 . Board of Regents v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedNguyen v. Radient Pharmaceuticals Corp.
946 F. Supp. 2d 1025 · District Court, C.D. California · May 17, 2013
Hollinger v. Titan Capital Corp., 914 F.2d 1564, 1569 (9th Cir.1990). A corporation’s scienter is shown by showing scienter for its officers or directors. Brown v. … Vucinich v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedProfessional Towing, LLC v. The City of Orange
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 22, 2023
Royal Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Control, 99 Cal. 16 App. 3d 788, 794 (1979). … Carrancho v. California Air Resources 14 Board, 111 Cal. App. 4th 1255, 1265 (2003). 15 3. Analysis. 16 a.
Cited 0 timesUnknown351 F. Supp. 676 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 12, 1972
See United States v. Stephens, 449 F.2d 103 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Pregerson, 448 F.2d 404 (9th Cir. 1971). … The Policy Statement of the Parole Board means merely that the Board will honor sentences validly imposed after May 1, 1971, granting the possibility of parole for crimes committed before that date.
Cited 5 timesPublishedRegents of University of California v. Shalala
872 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 6, 1994
Board”) denying it certain cost reimbursements under the Medicare program. … See Vlandis v.
Cited 0 timesPublished581 F. Supp. 753 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 1980
Justice Rehnquist issued an opinion in his capacity as Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit in Board of Education of City of Los Angeles v. … Crawford v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.3d 280 , 130 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 551 P.2d 28 (1976); the recent decisions of Justice Rehnquist and the California Supreme Court, supra; Sierra Club v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGipson v. Kajima Engineering & Construction, Inc.
972 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 1997
[and] do not become seamen because they happen to be working on board a vessel when they are injured.” Id. … See Cabral v. Healy Tibbits Builders, 1995 A.M.C. 2099 , 1995 WL 510326 (D.Haw.1995) (discussed above); Browning v. B.F. Diamond Const. Co.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna