Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscacd

4,084 results

0.68s

  • Deacon v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 12

    273 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 6, 1967

    Board. … While the case of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, etc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Corder v. Gates

    688 F. Supp. 1418 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 1988

    motion off calendar (Roy Brown). … Bennett v. Brown, 212 Cal.App.2d 685 , 28 Cal.Rptr. 485 (1963); Shain v. City of Albany, 106 Cal.App.3d 294 , 165 Cal.Rptr. 69 (1980). 3 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • MacIel v. City of Los Angeles

    542 F. Supp. 2d 1082 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 21, 2008

    This is also true of the Sam Browne belt and its contents. … See Monahan, 95 F.3d at 1284 ; Hensley, 786 F.2d at 357 ; Robertson v. Board of County Comm’rs, 78 F.Supp.2d 1142, 1159 (D.Colo. 1999). This Court finds the latter approach persuasive.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Tran. U., 1277 v. Sunline Tran. Agcy.

    663 F. Supp. 1560 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 1987

    Finally, if the General Manager does not resolve the dispute, the matter is submitted to "the Board of Arbitration" ("the Board"). … The Board then "render[s] a nonbinding recommendation to the Agency's Board of Directors within thirty ... days of the date the matter is submitted to the Board." Kleptar Declaration at 6.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Los Angeles Police Protective League v. Gates

    579 F. Supp. 36 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 17, 1984

    LAPD charged Gibson with insubordination, and the Board of Rights sustained the charge. … The search on February 10, 1982, of Gibson’s "Sam Browne" gun belt is no longer in issue because plaintiffs have not included this incident in their amended complaint. 6 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Robert John Garcia v. The BPH Board of Parole Hearings

    District Court, C.D. California · Sep 22, 2020

    Cooper v. Calderon, 274 F.3d 1270, 1273 (9th 18 Cir. 2001) (per curiam). … See Clark v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Quintana v. Gate

    88 F. Supp. 3d 1102 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 13, 2015

    In Brown v. … (citing Brown, 337 F.3d at 1161 ). In Davis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American Hotel & Lodging Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles

    119 F. Supp. 3d 1177 · District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2015

    Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Brown (“Brown”), 554 U.S. 60, 69 , 128 S.Ct. 2408 , 171 L.Ed.2d 264 (2008) (quoting Livadas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107, 119 , 114 S.Ct. 2068 , 129 L.Ed.2d 93 (1994)). 2. … Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60 , 128 S.Ct. 2408 , 171 L.Ed.2d 264 (2008).

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • In re Computer Sciences Corp. Derivative Litigation

    244 F.R.D. 580 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 24, 2007

    P. 23.1 (requiring particularized pleading for a plaintiffs failure to make a demand on the board); see also Shoen v. … Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927, 934 (Del.1993).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Chism v. County of San Bernardino

    159 F.R.D. 531 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 23, 1994

    This declaration does not satisfy the Kelly v. City of San Jose and Miller v. … Miller v. Panucci, 141 F.R.D. 292, 300, 301, supra. In Kelly v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • United States v. Newman

    297 F. Supp. 678 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 26, 1969

    The Court of Appeals, this Circuit, in the case of Welsh v. … Knox v. United States, 200 F.2d 398, 401 (9th Cir. 1952).”

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cochran v. NYP Holdings, Inc.

    58 F. Supp. 2d 1113 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 3, 1998

    She sarcastically notes the “less than pleasant” result of “this innocent-looking transaction” being Cochran’s boarding Louima’s team. … Simpson is in fact responsible for the death of Nicole Brown Simpson.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • McCoy v. Southwest Airlines Co.

    211 F.R.D. 381 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 7, 2002

    See Lesal Interiors, Inc. v. … These system boards “ ‘are the mandatory, exclusive, and comprehensive system for resolving grievance disputes.’ ” Kozy v. Wings West Airlines, Inc., 89 F.3d 635, 639 (9th Cir.1996) (quoting Long v.

    Cited 119 timesPublished
  • Donovan v. Mobley

    291 F. Supp. 930 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 17, 1968

    See Smith v. Cremins, 308 F.2d 187, 189, 190 , 98 A.L.R.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1962); Lambert v. Conrad, 308 F.2d 571 (9th Cir. 1962). … Findings by the Board are to be final.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Carothers

    697 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 22, 2010

    Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). In Brown v. Ohio, the Supreme Court clarified how double jeopardy applies to greater and lesser-included offenses. … Brown, 432 U.S. at 167 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fox

    481 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 17, 1979

    Board of School Commissioners v. Jacobs, 420 U.S. 128, 129 , 95 S.Ct. 848 , 43 L.Ed.2d 74 (1975); DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312, 317 , 94 S.Ct. 1704 , [1707], 40 L.Ed.2d 164 (1974). … of the Board and/or the federal common law; 3.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Blumberg v. Gates

    144 F. Supp. 2d 1221 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 13, 2001

    Gates, 99 F.3d 911 (9th Cir.1996) (“Trevino II”) and Cunningham v. … Ekergren v. City of Chicago, 538 F.Supp. 770, 772-773 (N.D.Ill. 1982); Brown v. City of Chicago, 573 F.Supp. *1224 1375, 1379 (N.D.Ill.1983).” Trevino II, 99 F.3d at 917 . Neither case is mentioned in Navarro . 7 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Washington Mutual Overdraft Protection Litigation

    539 F. Supp. 2d 1136 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 17, 2008

    Ford v. … the Board’s interpretation of its own regulation.”); Household Credit Services, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ankhenaten Ra El v. Crain

    560 F. Supp. 2d 932 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 4, 2008

    Moreover, Plaintiff (1) does not dispute that Brown supplied all of the documents requested except those with *949 held as privileged; (2) supplies no evidence that any delay by Brown was purposeful and done in bad faith, … V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Spin Master, Ltd. v. ZOBMONDO ENTERTAINMENT, LLC

    778 F. Supp. 2d 1052 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 22, 2011

    November 2001 v. … Robi v. Five Platters, Inc., 918 F.2d 1439, 1444 (9th Cir.1990); see also eCash Techs., Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.