Case law

United States v. Richmond

274 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 21, 1967

See also Uffelman v. United States (9 Cir.) 230 F.2d 297 ; Clark v. United States (9 Cir.) 236 F.2d 13 ; Frank v. United States (9 Cir.) 236 F.2d 39 ; Yaich v. … Cannon v. United States (9 Cir.) 181 F.2d 354 , cert. den. 340 U.S. 892 , 71 S.Ct. 199 , 95 L.Ed. 647 ; Local Draft Board No. 1 of Silver Bow County, Montana v. Connors (9 Cir.) 124 F.2d 388 ; Richter v.

Arroyo Vista Partners v. County of Santa Barbara

732 F. Supp. 1046 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 1990

As noted above, federal courts do not sit as a super zoning board or a zoning board of appeals. Raskiewicz v. Town of New Boston, 754 F.2d 38, 44 (1st Cir.1985) cert. denied Raskiewicz v. … The Supreme Court, as stated in Chongris v. Board of Appeal of Town of Andover, 811 F.2d 36, 40 (1st Cir.1987) cert. denied Chongris v.

Rossi v. Trans World Airlines

350 F. Supp. 1263 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 13, 1972

In Andrews v. … In Bower v.

United States v. Meulener

351 F. Supp. 1284 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 4, 1972

In United States v. … New York, supra, and Adams v.

Pardee v. Operating Engineers Pension Trust

408 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 24, 1976

See Phillipson v. Board of Administration, 3 Cal.3d 32 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 (1970). Of course, if Congress intended to regulate this area, it has the power to do so. Cf. Wissner v. … In re Marriage of Brown, 15 Cal.3d 838 , 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 (1976).

Gciu-Employer Ret. Fund & Bd. of Trs. of the Gciu Emp'r Ret. Fund v. Quad/Graphics, Inc.

302 F. Supp. 3d 1124 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 9, 2018

Trustees of Screen Actors Guild-Producers Pension & Health Plans v. NYCA, Inc. , 572 F.3d 771 , 776 (9th Cir. 2009). 24. … V.

Orrin W. Fox Co. v. NEW MOTOR VEH. BD., ETC.

440 F. Supp. 436 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 14, 1977

Fahey v. Mallonee, 332 U.S. 245 , 67 S.Ct. 1552 , 91 L.Ed. 2030 (1947). See also, Ewing v. … American Motors Sales Corp. v. New Motor Vehicle Board, 69 Cal.App.3d 983 , 138 Cal.Rptr. 594 (1977).

Blackwell v. Thornburgh

745 F. Supp. 1529 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 10, 1989

Brown, 713 F.Supp. 1056 (S.D. Ohio 1989) (granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (h) does not violate First, Fifth or Ninth Amendments); Escobar v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

MacIel v. City of Los Angeles

569 F. Supp. 2d 1038 · District Court, C.D. California · May 29, 2008

This is also true of the Sam Browne belt and its contents. … See Monahan, 95 F.3d at 1284 ; Hensley, 786 F.2d at 357 ; Robertson v. Board of County Comm’rs, 78 F.Supp.2d 1142, 1159 (D.Colo.1999). This Court finds the latter approach persuasive.

In Re Teledyne Defense Contracting Derivative Litigation

849 F. Supp. 1369 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 27, 1993

Ciresi v. … Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1347 (7th Cir.1983).

Independent Ink, Inc. v. Trident, Inc.

210 F. Supp. 2d 1155 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 3, 2002

See Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 . See also Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 792 F.2d 210, 218 (D.C.Cir.1986) (Bork, J.); Hornsby Oil Co., Inc. v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

Masotti v. Tustin Unified School District

806 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 9, 1992

Barlow-Gresham Union High School District No. 2 v. Mitchell, 940 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir.1991); See also Shelley C. v. … (No. 1) v. Burlingame Elementary School Dist., 886 F.2d 1558 -1559 (9th Cir.1989), supplemented at 897 F.2d 974 (9th Cir.1989); McSomebodies et al. (No. 2) v.

Tutor Perini Bldg. Corp. v. S. Cal. Dist. Council of Laborers

373 F. Supp. 3d 1309 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 2, 2019

Co. v. … V.

Runnels v. Parker

263 F. Supp. 271 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 27, 1967

Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners, 188 Cal. 525, 532 , 206 P. 70, 73 (1922). … In Tenney v.

Calnetics Corporation v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.

348 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 1972

In Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962), the Supreme Court sets forth the critical inquiry as: “ . . . … Chief Justice Warren in Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 .

Himebaugh v. Smith

476 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 1978

In In Brown v. … See Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co., supra, 287 F.Supp. at 775 ; Axelrod & Co. v. Kordich, Victor & Neufeld, supra, 451 F.2d at 843 . 14 .

Retail Digital Network, LLC v. Appelsmith

945 F. Supp. 2d 1119 · District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2013

Corp. v. … Miller v.

Kohn v. Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters

289 F. Supp. 2d 1155 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 2003

.”); Hudgens v. … See Alexander v.

Gonzales Ex Rel. Gonzales v. McEuen

435 F. Supp. 460 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 2, 1977

McEuen, with the Board of Trustees during' the hearings. No one doubts that a student charged with misconduct has a right to an impartial tribunal, see Wasson v. Trowbridge, 382 F.2d 807, 813 (2d Cir. 1967); Esteban v. … Withrow, supra, at 47 , 95 S.Ct. 1456 ; Jones v. Board of Educ., 279 F.Supp. 190, 200 (D.C., 1968).

Miller v. California Speedway Corp.

453 F. Supp. 2d 1193 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 8, 2006

Harper v. Wallingford, 877 F.2d 728 (9th Cir.1989). V. Plaintiff s ADA Claim A. … v.