Case law

Kennedy v. SHEET METAL WORKERS INT. ASS'N LOCAL 108

289 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 1, 1968

Brown, 284 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. den. 366 U. *83 S. 934, 81 S.Ct. 1659 , 6 L.Ed.2d 846 (1961). … That is the function of the Board." Modern v. Building Trades Council, 55 LRRM 2589, 2591 (D.Conn.1964).

Kevorkian v. Arnett

939 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 1996

In Donaldson v. … Id. at 1646, 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 793 , quoting Newland v. Board of Governors, 19 Cal.3d 705, 711 , 139 Cal. Rptr. 620 , 566 P.2d 254 (1977).

Hook v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

42 F. Supp. 2d 976 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 2, 1998

Durfey v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours Co., 59 F.3d 121, 125 (9th Cir.1995); Hanford Downwinders Coalition, Inc. v. Dowdle, 71 F.3d 1469, 1477 (9th Cir.1995). … Brown knew something was wrong in the 1980’s. Mr. Signorelli suffered from bronchitis six years ago; saw black plumes coming from Lockheed prior to 1995; and watched the news.

United States v. Hughes Tool Co.

415 F. Supp. 637 · District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 1976

United States v. Marine Bancorporation, 418 U.S. 602, 618 , 94 S.Ct. 2856, 2868 , 41 L.Ed.2d 978, 989 (1974); Brown Shoe Co. v. … In Brown Shoe Co. v.

Clemente v. United States

568 F. Supp. 1150 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 1983

See Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). In Mahroom v. … Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 , 100 S.Ct. 1398 , 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v.

Victor Shawn Brown v. The People of the State of California

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 19, 2019

STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTOR SHAWN BROWN … See Strickland v.

Nairn v. United States

290 F. Supp. 157 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 19, 1968

Norris v. Wilson, 378 F.2d 324, 326 (9th Cir. 1967); Wallace v. Heinze, 351 F.2d 39, 40 (9th Cir. 1965); Davis v. United States, 347 F.2d 374, 375 (9th Cir. 1965); Harris v. … In Thomas v.

Hill v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

896 F. Supp. 1492 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 7, 1995

Similarly, in Brown v. … Step 3 provides that a complaint should be submitted to a Board of Adjustment with two representatives of the Board chosen by the union and two by the employer.

Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. Creative House Promotions, Inc.

728 F. Supp. 1442 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 6, 1989

V 1981), which provides no protection for any work that became part of the public domain prior to January 1, 1978, the effective date of the Act. See Brown v. Tabb, 714 F.2d 1088, 1090 (11th Cir.1983). … Application of the rationale articulated by Professor Nimmer to a case analogous to the case at hand is found in Brown v. Tabb, 714 F.2d 1088 (11th Cir.1983).

Robinson v. City of San Bernardino Police Department

992 F. Supp. 1198 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 26, 1998

Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, 123 Cal.App.3d 211, 226 , 176 Cal.Rptr. 439 (1981); Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. State Board of Equalization, 238 Cal.App.2d 372, 389 , 47 Cal.Rptr. 848 (1965). … Fund v. Brown, 32 Cal.App.4th 188, 203 , 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 98 (1995). 7 .

Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1277 v. SunLine Transit Agency

663 F. Supp. 1560 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 7, 1987

Finally, if the General Manager does not resolve the dispute, the matter is submitted to “the Board of Arbitration” (“the Board”). … The Board then “render[s] a nonbinding recommendation to the Agency’s Board of Directors within thirty ... days of the date the matter is submitted to the Board.” Kleptar Declaration at 6.

In re Live Concert Antitrust Litigation

863 F. Supp. 2d 966 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 2012

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … Although Brown Shoe involved a claim under Clayton Act § 7, its submarket analysis is applicable in Sherman Act cases. See Greyhound [Computer Corp., Inc. v.

Gregory Ackers v. University of California Board of Regents

District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 2024

Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987); see also Baker v. Director, U.S. Parole Comm’n, 916 F.2d 725, 726 (D.C. … See, e.g., Doremus v.

Christopher White v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 16, 2020

Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); 17 see also Link v. Wabash R.R. … See Ferdik v.

Arias v. United States

388 F. Supp. 736 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 28, 1975

During the course of the final conversation following this brief disappearance, a brown bag appeared in Arellanes’ possession. None of the officers testified that they witnessed Arias actually possessing the brown bag. … Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 89 , 91 S.Ct. 210, 220 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970).

Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan

51 F. Supp. 3d 910 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 2014

The defendants are the Motion Picture Industry (“MPI”) Health Plan and the Board of Trustees of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan (together “the plan”). … Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co., 458 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir.2006) (en banc). Oldoerp, 500 Fed.Appx. at 576-77 (¶ break added, ■ alterations and brackets omitted) (nn. 3 and 4 omitted); see also Brown v. Life Ins.

United States v. $60,201.00 U.S. Currency

291 F. Supp. 2d 1126 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 2003

Brown, a former arbitrator for the Los Angeles County Bar Association Attorney Fee Dispute panel. Mr. … Brown has attested “it is common for experienced federal litigators in the Los Angeles area ... to bill in one-quarter hour (0.25) increments for each task performed.” (Dec! of Thomas M. Brown ¶ 6.) The Court finds Mr.

United States v. Richmond

274 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 21, 1967

See also Uffelman v. United States (9 Cir.) 230 F.2d 297 ; Clark v. United States (9 Cir.) 236 F.2d 13 ; Frank v. United States (9 Cir.) 236 F.2d 39 ; Yaich v. … Cannon v. United States (9 Cir.) 181 F.2d 354 , cert. den. 340 U.S. 892 , 71 S.Ct. 199 , 95 L.Ed. 647 ; Local Draft Board No. 1 of Silver Bow County, Montana v. Connors (9 Cir.) 124 F.2d 388 ; Richter v.

Twentieth Century Fox Television v. Empire Distribution Inc.

161 F. Supp. 3d 902 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 1, 2016

Brown v. Elec. Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1242 (9th Cir.2013) (emphasis added). Accordingly, the Court will consider this case under the two-pronged Rogers test. 1. … Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1241 (9th Cir.2013) (holding that the “Rogers test is reserved for expressive works.”)

Arroyo Vista Partners v. County of Santa Barbara

732 F. Supp. 1046 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 7, 1990

As noted above, federal courts do not sit as a super zoning board or a zoning board of appeals. Raskiewicz v. Town of New Boston, 754 F.2d 38, 44 (1st Cir.1985) cert. denied Raskiewicz v. … The Supreme Court, as stated in Chongris v. Board of Appeal of Town of Andover, 811 F.2d 36, 40 (1st Cir.1987) cert. denied Chongris v.