Case law

Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.

786 F. Supp. 1518 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 11, 1991

In Parker v. … Later, Robbins also sent letters like these to the County of Sacramento, the City of Los Angeles, the City of San Diego and the State of California Water Resources Board. 32 .

Paulissen v. US LIFE INS. CO. IN CITY OF NY

205 F. Supp. 2d 1120 · District Court, C.D. California · May 13, 2002

Berger v. … See Sprague v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 177 F.R.D. 78 (D.N.H.1998); Shapardon v. West Beach Estates, 172 F.R.D. 415 (D.Haw.1997); Brown v. Best Foods, 169 F.R.D. 385 (N.D.Ala.1996). Dr. Weiss never treated Mr.

Russo v. APL Marine Services, Ltd.

135 F. Supp. 3d 1089 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 24, 2015

When the Plaintiff boarded the vessel on December 4, 2012, she was excited about being with Captain Londagin again. (SUF 21.) … Co. v. Buckley, 521 U.S. 424, 430 , 117 S.Ct. 2113 , 138 L.Ed.2d. 560 (1997)); see also Wahlstrom v.

Loma Linda Community Hospital v. Shalala

907 F. Supp. 1399 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 1995

See Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. de la Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141 , 102 S.Ct. 3014 , 73 L.Ed.2d 664 (1982); Norfolk Energy, Inc. v. Hodel, 898 F.2d 1435 (9th Cir.1990); McLaughlin v. … See Kline v. Dept. of Health & Human Services, 927 F.2d 522, 524 (10th Cir.1991); Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corp., 823 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir.1987); Pellerin v.

League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson

908 F. Supp. 755 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 20, 1995

Co. v. … Michigan Canners & Freezers v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Board, 467 U.S. 461, 469 , 104 S.Ct. 2518, 2523 , 81 L.Ed.2d 399 (1984); Florida Lime & Avocado Growers v.

Flores v. Lynch

212 F. Supp. 3d 907 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 21, 2015

Brown v. United States, 2011 WL 333380 , *2 (C.D.Cal. Jan. 31, 2011). “Whether to grant a motion for reconsideration under Local Rule 7-18 is a matter within the court’s discretion.” Daghlian v. … See Flores v. Meese, 681 F.Supp. 665, 666 (C.D.Cal.1988). . ‘.'

Finance Express LLC v. Nowcom Corp.

564 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 18, 2008

The board noted that the term “express” conveyed to consumers that the services would be fast. Id. at *5 . … Co. v.

Arthur Gutierrez v. Anning-Johnson Company

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 6, 2023

Section 28 provides that the “Boards of Adjustment shall be created for the settlement of disputes.” Dkt. 18-2 at 451. … of the Board to resolve such differences.

Los Angeles Unified School District v. D.L.

548 F. Supp. 2d 815 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 10, 2008

Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 109 , 103 S.Ct. 1660 , 75 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); Lee v. Schmidt-Wenzel, 766 F.2d 1387, 1390 (9th Cir.1985). … W.G. v. Board of Trustees of Target Range School Dist. No. 23, 960 F.2d 1479, 1486 (9th Cir.1992).

Irma Olivarez Lucas v. Nancy A. Berryhill

District Court, C.D. California · May 6, 2020

See, e.g., Leon v. Berryhill, 880 F.3d 1041, 1046 (9th Cir. 2017); Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015); Burrell v. … v.

Lionel Valencia Ruiz v. LJ Milusnic

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 6, 2020

Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 935 (9th Cir. 2005). The exhaustion requirement applies to all inmate suits about prison life (Porter v. … In Albino v.

Telonious Lamar Taylor v. Josie Gastello

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2020

See Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 2002) (district court has discretion, 11 but is not required, to consider claims presented in party’s objections to magistrate judge’s report 12 and recommendation). … Stokley v. Ryan, 659 F.3d 802, 811 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Schriro v. 26 Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465, 474, 127 S. Ct. 1933, 167 L. Ed. 2d 836 (2007)).

Standard Wire & Cable Co. v. AmeriTrust Corp.

697 F. Supp. 368 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 22, 1988

PARTIES In addition to Standard, the Plaintiffs are Dickran Hampikian, Chairman of the Board and 50% shareholder of Standard; Betty Hampikian, his wife; Russell Skrable, President and 50% shareholder of Standard; and Jerrilyn … V. Associates Corp. of North America’s (ACONA) motion to dismiss.

Yohanna Rosally Urrutia Canizalez v. Warden, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 4, 2026

On March 24, 2026, an immigration judge ordered her removed; she timely appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) on April 15, 2026, and that appeal remains pending, so her removal order is not administratively … Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 308–09 (2018).

Maljack Productions, Inc. v. UAV Corp.

964 F. Supp. 1416 · District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 1997

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323 , 106 S.Ct. at 2552-53 ; British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 951 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 1790 , 60 L.Ed.2d 241 (1979). … Gracen v.

Todd Vincent Davie v. Sheriff Alex Villanueva

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 20, 2020

Schell v. … Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Carden v.

In Re Computer Sciences Corp. Erisa Litigation

635 F. Supp. 2d 1128 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 13, 2009

Devereaux v. Abbey, 263 F.3d 1070, 1076 (9th Cir.2001) (citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)). … See Alvidres v. Countrywide Fin. Corp., No. 07-5810, 2008 WL 819330 , at *3, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27431 , at *7 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 18, 2008) (citing Pegram v.

Coulombe v. Jolly

447 F. Supp. 2d 1117 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 2006

Jolly, Director of the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (“Jolly”). … See FW/PBS, Inc. v.

United States v. Stringfellow

661 F. Supp. 1053 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 4, 1987

State of New York v. Shore Realty Corporation, 759 F.2d 1032, 1044 (2d Cir.1985); United States v. Cauffman, *1061 21 ERC 2167 (1984); United States v. Wade, 577 F.Supp. 1326, 1333 (E.D.Pa.1983). … Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Company v. United States, 250 U.S. 123, 125 , 39 S.Ct. 407, 408 , 63 L.Ed. 889 (1919). See also, Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1487, 1491 (9th Cir.1983); United States v.

Tarek Fazel v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 27, 2023

Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492. 9 Remand is warranted on this issue. 10 11 V.