Case law

Brown v. County of San Bernardino

250 F. Supp. 3d 568 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2017

WHEN DEPUTIES ASKED BROWN WHAT HER NAME WAS SHE REFUSED TO GIVE HER NAME MULT TIMES AND SAID FUCK YOU. DO [sic] TO BROWN BEING A PRIOR UB SHE COULDN’T BE BOOKED INTO BB JAIL AND WAS TAKEN TO WVDC. … BROWN TRIED TO KICK OUT THE WINDOW IN THE UNIT SO SHE WAS HOBLED [sic], BROWN WAS COMBATIVE AND WVDC WAS ADVISED. BROWN REFUSED TO SIGN HER CITATION SO I COMPLETED A PC DEC FOR HER.

Bankruptcy Recovery Network v. Brown (In re Brown)

235 B.R. 644 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 29, 1999

Brown no longer possessed the necklace. BRN could not offer to forbear reclamation of goods that Mr. Brown did not have. … See Diamontiney v. Borg, 918 F.2d 793, 797 (9th Cir.1990) (explaining that action based on reasonable interpretation of court’s order prevents application of contempt); Shuffler v.

Brown v. United States

290 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 2, 1968

“THE CLERK: Does defendant Tommie Louis Lee Brown waive reading of the Indictment ? “DEFENDANT BROWN: Yes, I will. … Harris v. United States, 338 F.2d 75,80 (9th Cir. 1964). PETITIONER’S SECOND CONTENTION That there was an abridgment of the constitutional rights set forth in Machibroda v. United States.

Brown v. County of Santa Barbara

427 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 14, 1977

The 1974 Amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 203 , were not stricken across the board. … Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 , 97 S.Ct. 451 , 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976); Frontiero v. Richard *114 son, 411 U.S. 677 , 93 S.Ct. 1764 , 36 L.Ed.2d 583 (1973); Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 , 92 S.Ct. 251 , 30 L.Ed.2d 225 (1971).

Berjikian v. Franchise Tax Board

93 F. Supp. 3d 1151 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 12, 2015

Board of Educ. of the Lynwood Unified School Dist., 149 F.3d 971 , 983 (9th Cir.1998). … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

United States ex rel. Brown v. Celgene Corp.

226 F. Supp. 3d 1032 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 28, 2016

Brown argues that Celgene violated the AKS in four ways: (1) by hiring physicians as promotional speakers in exchange for prescriptions, (2) by offering physicians paid clinical trials, advisory board positions, and ghost-written … Clinical Trials, Admsory Board, Positions, and Ghost-Written Articles Brown offers a single sentence in her brief asserting that Celgene “rewarded doctors with paid clinical trials, advisory board positions, and authorship

Brown v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.

356 F. Supp. 3d 949 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 29, 2019

(Board Certified in Family, Occupational and Aerospace Medicine). (1861-66.) Dr. … See Demer v. IBM Corp.

DMI Furniture, Inc. v. Brown, Kraft & Co.

644 F. Supp. 1517 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 1986

See Ayala v. … Santa Fe Indus., Inc. v.

Kaufman v. Board of Trustees

168 F.R.D. 278 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 28, 1996

The plaintiff names as *280 defendants the Board of Trustees of the HUSD, the President of HUSD’s Board of Education, members of HUSD’s Board of Education, Marcy Savage (school principal), Lori Masiel (a parent), and Does … Brown Act, specifically California Government Code § 54957. In federal question cases, federal law determines whether there is a privilege. See Fed.R.Evid. 501; Kerr v.

Vogel v. Torrance Board of Education

447 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 1978

V. … In Johnson v.

State of Cal. by and Through Brown v. Watt

520 F. Supp. 1359 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 18, 1981

They are intended to be involved in every stage of the planning from drawing board to execution. … NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965).

L'Garde, Inc. v. Raytheon Space & Airborne Systems

805 F. Supp. 2d 932 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 26, 2011

See also Wallis v. … See Locke v.

Baker v. Downey City Board of Education

307 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 17, 1969

Dresser v. District Board ([135] Wis. [619]), 116 N.W. 232, 235 , [16 L.R.A.,N.S., 730] (1908).” [Emphasis added.] Dr. … Board of Education, etc., 286 F.Supp. 988, 991-992 (N. D.Ill.1968); and Schwartz v. Schuker, 298 F.Supp. 238, 240-242 (E.D.N.Y. 1969).

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

311 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 12, 1970

In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), the Supreme Court was dealing, simply, with racial segregation. … In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), the Supreme Court was dealing, simply, with racial segregation.

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

384 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 12, 1974

See, Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 311 F.Supp. 501 (C.D.Cal.1970). … See, Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 375 F.Supp. 1304 (C.D.Cal.1974).

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education

375 F. Supp. 1304 · District Court, C.D. California · May 3, 1974

Brown v. Board of Education II, supra; Raney v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 443 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 727 (1968); Green v. County School Board, supra. … “De jure” and “de facto” are only adjectives that give some attempted “legal” distinction to the aims of Brown v. Board of Education I, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), and Brown v.

Lahr v. National Transportation Safety Board

453 F. Supp. 2d 1153 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 31, 2006

Katzman v. Cent. … Recovery Fund v.

Brown & Caldwell v. Institute for Energy Funding, Ltd.

617 F. Supp. 649 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 5, 1985

See Burke v. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc., 592 F.2d 542 (9th Cir.1979) (jurisdiction proper over third-party complaint for indemnity ancillary to main action); Glens Falls Indem. Co. v. … Co. v.

Robinson v. California Board of Prison Terms

997 F. Supp. 1303 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 1998

. § 1983 against defendants California Board of Prison Terms (“BPT”) and Does 1-100 claiming, in the first cause of action, that the BPT has acted in a “Racketeer Influencefd] and Corrupted Organizationt[s] manner” 1 to deny … Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 (9th Cir.1996). To have standing to bring a civil RICO claim, a plaintiff must have suffered an injury to business or property by the alleged unlawful conduct.

Hankison v. Board of Prison Terms

768 F. Supp. 720 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 27, 1991

In Townsend v. … Brown, 417 F.Supp. 340 (E.D.Pa.1976). 8 This Court also cannot ignore the probable existence of pressures upon Myklyn to help the father she still professes to love. See Iowa v.