Case law

Owens D. Kelly v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 27, 2024

P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. … Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”); Ash v.

Vanessa West v. Rheem Manufacturing Company et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 30, 2026

Brown v. Accellion, Inc., No. 5:21-CV- 01155-EJD, 2023 WL 1928210, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2023) (quoting Gonzalez v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, No. 16-cv-01891-DAD-JLT, 2018 WL 3689564, at *3 (E.D. Cal. … San Jose Mercury News, Inc v. US. Dist. Ct, 187 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir. 1999).

Madden v. Independence Bank

771 F. Supp. 1510 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 1, 1991

In late May 1989, Fulvio Dob-rich became Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Independence Bank. … Douglas v. Anderson, 656 F.2d 528, 534 (9th Cir.1981).

In re Russo

53 F.R.D. 564 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 17, 1971

United States v. Thoresen, swupra; Loux v. United States, 389 F.2d 911, 916 (9 Cir. 1968). … As the Supreme Court observed in Brown v.

Omid T. Moghadam v. Sheriff of Los Angeles County

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 4, 2026

Stockton v. Brown, 152 F.4th 1124, 1138 (9th Cir. 2025) 28 1 (citation omitted). … v.

Davies v. Valdes

462 F. Supp. 2d 1084 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 1, 2006

The decision of a prison disciplinary board does not violate due process if it is supported by “some evidence.” Superintendent, Mass. Corr. Inst. v. … Rather, it is satisfied if there is “any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Id. at 455-56 , 105 S.Ct. 2768 .

National Ass'n of Chain Drug Stores v. Schwarzenegger

678 F. Supp. 2d 995 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 22, 2009

Id. at 6-7 (citing Devose v. … See Global Horizons, Inc. v.

Ellick v. Barnhart

445 F. Supp. 2d 1166 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2006

2004 WL 883447 *4 (N.D.Iowa Apr. 22, 2004) (reducing fees from $7,872.50 to $4,750 for a de facto hourly rate of $180.95; noting that the time spent researching issue that was neither complex nor unusual seemed high); and Brown … v.

Myers v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

109 F. Supp. 3d 1331 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 16, 2015

See also Fortyune v. … Co. v. Super.

Sara Muncy v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Dec 23, 2022

Brown-Hunter v. … Smartt v.

Anhing Corp. v. Thuan Phong Co.

215 F. Supp. 3d 919 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 17, 2015

In Swiss Watch International, Inc. v. … Gallo Winery v.

Reyes v. Downey Savings and Loan Ass'n, FA

541 F. Supp. 2d 1108 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 29, 2008

The statutory language “suggests that Congress expressly contemplated, and approved, the Board’s promulgation of regulations superseding state law.” Id. … See also Fenning v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Gill

183 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 13, 2001

V. … The Court notes that there is no evidence that suggests that CRCA has a Board of Directors or any corporate officers. 5 .

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc.

985 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 17, 1997

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323 , 106 S.Ct. at 2552-53 ; *956 British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 951 (9th Cir.1978). … Inc. v.

Derwin Jules Jackson v. T.L. Campbell

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 21, 2024

Drury v. … Brown v. Ahern, 676 F.3d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 2012) 15 (citation omitted).

Chris W. Kibunguchy v. Tylenol Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 2, 2020

See Crawford v. … Under California state law, he has the right to a hearing before the Board of Parole Hearings to contest his mental-health classification. See Cal. Penal Code § 2966(a).

Doe v. Unocal Corp.

67 F. Supp. 2d 1140 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 5, 1999

In City of Los Angeles v. … In ASARCO Inc. v.

Fabian Financial Services v. Kurt H. Volk, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan

768 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 31, 1991

The Court has described section 514(a) of ERISA as a “virtually unique preemption provision” (see Franchise Tax Board v. … As stated by the Second Circuit in Bird v.

Richard Blair v. Martin O'Malley

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 23, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. 14 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation omitted). 15 III 16 Plaintiff contends that the ALJ erred in discrediting … Burrell v.

Patricia Carrillo v. Martin O'Malley

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 21, 2025

See Hiler v. … Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th 14 Cir. 2008) (quoting Thomas v. Barnhart, 278 F.3d 947, 958 (9th Cir. 2002)); see 15 Brown-Hunter v.