Case law

Jacobson v. Schwarzenegger

357 F. Supp. 2d 1198 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 30, 2004

This action appears to have been precipitated by the removal of the plaintiff from an “attorney appointment list” maintained by the California Board of Prison Terms (“BPT”) from which attorneys are appointed to represent … The statute further provides that "any state employee at any rank and file, supervisory, or managerial level found by the State Personnel Board to have intentionally engaged in ... retaliation ... shall be liable in damages

Church of the Soldiers of the Cross of Christ v. City of Riverside

886 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 2, 1995

Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 460-63 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290-91 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980) (striking down ban on residential picketing that exempted labor picketing); and Police Department of Chicago v. … Carreras v.

Adam Acosta v. District Council 36 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 22, 2019

For example, prior to a board meeting, Fowler told Plaintiff, “there are too many of you,” referring to his Latino race. … See Andrews v. Board of Trustees of the California State University, No. CV 18-9832 PSG, 2019 WL 4137622 (C.D. Cal. May 28, 2019): Kisaka v. University of Southern California USC, No.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ingram

694 F. Supp. 1437 · District Court, C.D. California · May 3, 1988

There was a discussion, later aborted, regarding a possible seat for Ingram on SSI’s board. 2 . … Basic Inc., et al. v.

Xu Tao v. Thomas Homan, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 11, 2026

Petitioner did not appeal that decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Id. … Rosebrock v. Mathis, 745 F.3d 963, 971 (9th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted). This may occur when interim relief deprives the Court of the ability to redress the party’s injuries. See United States v.

D.K. Ex Rel. Kumetz-Coleman v. Huntington Beach Union High School District

428 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 22, 2006

Collinsgru v. Palmyra Board of Education, 161 F.3d 225, 231 (3rd Cir. 1998). D.K. and his parents make two arguments in support of their ability to proceed in this action pro se. … Lucht v.

James C. Howe v. Martin Gamboa

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 1, 2022

In Ground One, Petitioner contends that the 9 Board of Parole Hearings (the “Board”) violated recent California law by 10 considering his prior convictions in concluding that he was not suitable for 11 parole, and … App’x 616, 617 4 (9th Cir. 2012) (claim that the Board’s decision was not supported by some 5 evidence in violation of petitioner’s due process rights was foreclosed by 6 Cooke); Johnson v. Sec’y of Cal.

Ralph Johnson v. J. Scott

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 28, 2021

California has not waived its 17 Eleventh Amendment immunity with respect to section 1983 claims. 18 Brown v. Calif. … The denial of a religious practice, 2 or a religious meal, on a single isolated occasion does not constitute 3 a “substantial burden” and thus does not violate the First Amendment. 4 See, e.g., Brown v.

Fabian Financial Services v. Kurt H. Volk, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan

768 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 31, 1991

The Court has described section 514(a) of ERISA as a “virtually unique preemption provision” (see Franchise Tax Board v. … As stated by the Second Circuit in Bird v.

Cellular Accessories for Less, Inc. v. Trinitas LLC

65 F. Supp. 3d 909 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 5, 2014

Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1472 (9th Cir.1992) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). … Music, Inc. v. E.

In re Quality Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation

60 F. Supp. 3d 1095 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 20, 2014

Defendant Ra-zin is the founder of QSI and served as the Chairman of the Board during the Class Period. (AC ¶ 26.) … Corp. v.

In Re Amgen Inc. Securities Litigation

544 F. Supp. 2d 1009 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 1, 2008

The data safety monitoring board stopped the study because of a higher rate of blood clotting in patients randomized to the normal-level group. (Id.) … Defendant Sharer was, at all relevant times, Amgen’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. (CAC, 1! 14.)

Hollinquest v. St. Francis Medical Center

872 F. Supp. 723 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 26, 1994

Young v. Anthony’s Fish Grottos, Inc., 830 F.2d 993, 998-998 (9th Cir.1987) 7 ; Stallcop v. … For instance in Caterpillar Inc. v.

Export-Import Bank v. United California Discount Corp.

738 F. Supp. 2d 1047 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 7, 2010

See Bd. of Trade of S.F. v. … Nat’l Bank v.

Cohen v. United States

63 F. Supp. 2d 1131 · District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 1999

Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358, 365-66 , 66 S.Ct. 637 , 90 L.Ed. 718 (1946). … Plaintiffs seek to rely on Buffalo Bills, Inc. v.

Nathan Kogen v. Nancy A. Berryhill

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 27, 2019

Brown-Hunter v. … May 10, 2017) (finding claimant’s reliance on Brown–Hunter 6 “unavailing” for similar reason); see also Fisher v. Berryhill, 7 No. 1:17-cv-01189-GSA, 2018 WL 5979457, at *8 (E.D. Cal.

Jacob Andrew Bergeron v. Kiry K. Gray

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 26, 2020

See McDonald v. Smith, 19 472 U.S. 479, 484, 105 S. Ct. 1827, 86 L. … (citation omitted); see also 22 Brown v. Villaraigosa, 2010 WL 11483802, at *12 (C.D. Cal.

Jose De Jesus Cardenas v. George Jaime

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 9, 2021

See Brown v. … Jones v.

Lisker v. Knowles

651 F. Supp. 2d 1097 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 6, 2009

Jackson, 513 F.3d at 1076 ; Hayes v. Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 984 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). … See Hayes v. Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 984 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) {citing United States v. Zuno-Arce, 339 F.3d 886, 889 (9th Cir. 2003)).

Sandoval v. Saticoy Lemon Ass'n

747 F. Supp. 1373 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 31, 1990

An enforcement action brought by the union against Saticoy before the National Labor Relations Board was unsuccessful. … Furthermore, many Seaboard Board members who had directly confronted this issue became Saticoy Board members after the merger.