Case law

Tam v. Federal Deposit Insurance

830 F. Supp. 2d 850 · District Court, C.D. California · Nov 14, 2011

See also 73 Fed.Reg. 56710 (Sept. 30, 2008) (“The interim rule is effective on September 26, 2008, the date on which the FDIC Board of Directors approved the interim rule”). E. … Bowen v.

Amy Crush v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 25, 2020

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 12 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Bunnell v. … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494 (an ALJ’s erroneous 24 assessment of a claimant’s testimony is harmless only if it is “inconsequential to the 25 ultimate nondisability determination”) (citing Molina v.

C.D. v. Atascadero Unified School District

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 5, 2023

Legal Framework and Standard of Review 8 The Court in School Board of the City of Norfolk v. Brown, 769 F. Supp. 2d 928, 9 945–46 (E.D. … Plaintiff cites M.C. v.

Wilkinson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

111 F.R.D. 432 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 28, 1986

For example, in NAACP v. … Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603-04 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 684 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967) (holding unconstitutional an anticommunist New York “loyalty oath” required of university teachers); Sweezy v.

J.G. ex rel. Jimenez v. Baldwin Park Unified School District

78 F. Supp. 3d 1268 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 20, 2015

State statutes, and regulations enacted pursuant to those statutes, also apply in IDEA cases, see Board of Educ. of the Hendrick Hudson Central Sch. Dist., Westchester County v. … See Board of Educ. of Hendrick Hudson Central Sch. Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 205-07 , 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3050-51 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982).

Federal Trade Commission v. J.K. Publications, Inc.

99 F. Supp. 2d 1176 · District Court, C.D. California · Apr 7, 2000

(See id. at 305 [Resolution of the Board of Directors of TAL]; 311-322 [merchant agreement].) … IBM Corp. v. Brown, 857 F.Supp. 1384, 1387 (C.D.Cal.1994) (citing Dresser, 628 F.2d at 1375).

Kunin v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance

696 F. Supp. 1342 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 19, 1988

Dockray v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 801 F.2d 1149, 1152 (9th Cir.1986); Jung v. FMC Corp., 755 F.2d 708, 711-712 (9th Cir.1985.) … In Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield v.

Christine Gonzalez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 27, 2019

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 27 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015); Burrell v. Colvin, 775 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Molina 28 v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493 7 (quoting Bunnell v. Sullivan, 947 F.2d 341, 345-46 (9th Cir. 1991) (en banc)).

Felica Ann Calloway v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 30, 2022

Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 19 | F.3d at 492 (citations omitted).

Orlando Garcia v. CWI Santa Barbara Hotel, LLP

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 30, 2022

Garcia v. Guadalupe Alcocer & Digit. Currency Servs., Inc., No. CV 2 08419-VAP (JEMx), 2022 WL 495051, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2022) (quoting 3 Brown v. … See Brown, 3 | 246 F.3d at 1190. 4 The Court need not address whether the ADA’s cost-shifting provision is 5 || “contrary” to Rule 54(d)(1) or whether Marx impliedly overruled Brown.

Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.

943 F. Supp. 2d 1028 · District Court, C.D. California · May 2, 2013

Ethicon, Inc. v. … Id.; ADA Solutions, Inc. v.

Gable v. National Broadcasting Co.

727 F. Supp. 2d 815 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 22, 2010

See, e.g., Brown Bag Software, 960 F.2d at 1473-74 (relying on expert testimony to identify the objective points of comparison among different computer software programs); Swirsky v. … Swirsky was quoting Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1472 (9th Cir.1992), which in turn quoted from Anderson v.

Ramon Lopez Martinez v. Senior Warden, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 27, 2026

Petitioner appealed that removal order the same day to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). … Thiravong v. Scott, 2026 WL 1382356, at *2 (W.D. Wash. May 18, 2026).

Marquise Bailey v. Santa Fe Express Hand Car Wash, Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 3, 2025

(Dkt. 15, 18); see generally Becker v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Inc., No. 10- cv-2799, 2012 WL 6005759, at *4, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170729, at *10 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2012). … Brown Federal Building and Courthouse and Courthouse 3420 Twelfth Street 255 East Temple Street 411 W. 4th Street Room 125 Suite 170 (Terrace Level) Room 1055 (1st Floor)

Synoptek, LLC v. Synaptek Corp.

326 F. Supp. 3d 976 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 6, 2017

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown , 564 U.S. 915 , 919, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). … See Daimler AG v.

Gebhard v. S. S. Hawaiian Legislator

284 F. Supp. 634 · District Court, C.D. California · May 10, 1968

In Gutierrez v. Waterman S. S. … In Robillard v. A. L.

Cambridge Electronics Corp. v. MGA Electronics, Inc.

227 F.R.D. 313 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 22, 2004

Co., supra, 9 Cal.App.4th at 1213 , 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 918 (citing Arnold v. Browne, 27 Cal.App.3d 386, 394 , 103 Cal.Rptr. 775 (1972)); but cf. Slottow v. American Cas. … Co. v.

Perfect 10 v. Google, Inc.

416 F. Supp. 2d 828 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 17, 2006

Ctr. v. … Ctr. v.

United States v. Rosen

365 F. Supp. 2d 1126 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 23, 2005

United States v. … United States v.

Greene v. Armco, Inc.

696 F. Supp. 1328 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 1, 1988

During those months, Meeder had appeared for his clients in proceedings before the EEOC and the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, as well as in Greene I and Greene II. … See, e.g., Bartulica v. Paculdo, 411 F.Supp. 392 , 397 n. 3 (W.D.Mo.1976); Pettway v.