Case law

Meta-Film Associates, Inc. v. MCA, Inc.

586 F. Supp. 1346 · District Court, C.D. California · May 14, 1984

In Chern v. … Smith v.

Aanestad v. Air Canada, Inc.

382 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, C.D. California · Sep 30, 1974

This was reiterated in Susquehanna, etc., v. Blatchford, 11 Wall 172, 78 U.S. 172 , in 1870, where the court said: Susquehanna, etc. v. … It was so adjudged as early as 1808 in Chappedelaine v. Dechenaux, 4 Cranch 307 [306] 2 L.Ed. 629 * * * *. This ruling was followed in Childress v. Emory, 8 Wheat 669 [642], 5 L.Ed. 705 , and in Osborn v.

Tomlinson v. Indymac Bank, F.S.B.

359 F. Supp. 2d 891 · District Court, C.D. California · Feb 18, 2005

Bonnell v. … Medical Board of California, 31 Cal.4th 1255, 1264 , 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 532 , 82 P.3d 740 (2003) (explaining that, in California, "agency interpretations are not binding or ... authoritative” and "[c]ourts must, in short, independently

PIH Health Hospital-Whittier v. CIGNA Healthcare of California Inc

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 16, 2021

Cigna included the Declaration of Karen Brown (“Brown 6 Decl.”), whereby Cigna provided “the Patient M.A. claim as a single example of 7 claims asserted by Plaintiffs that arise out of and depend on the terms … (Brown Decl. ¶¶ 2, 5–6, Exs. A & B, ECF No. 1-2.)

Cucci v. Edwards

510 F. Supp. 2d 479 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 2, 2007

Artusi is a Texas resident who became a member of Powerwave’s Board of Directors in December 2002, and served at all relevant times on the Company’s Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. … Plaintiff, citing Ginns v.

Pauline Hunter v. Alex Villanueva

District Court, C.D. California · May 31, 2023

See United States v. … Howell, 23 231 F.3d 615, 631-22 (9th Cir. 2000) (district judge did not abuse discretion in refusing 24 to consider factual allegations not presented to the magistrate judge); see also Brown v. 25 Roe, 279 F.3d 742,

In re Paxil Litigation

218 F.R.D. 242 · District Court, C.D. California · Aug 29, 2003

Co. v. … Cloud v.

Dorian Carter v. Tracy Sheen

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 10, 2020

See Gaus v. … It does not have an open enrollment policy and board membership is uncompensated and unelected.’”)). Additionally, the Los Angeles Superior Court action, Dorian Carter v.

Paula D. Gotlibowski v. Nancy A. Berryhill

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 18, 2020

Orn v. … Bray v.

Douglass v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

662 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 8, 1987

Hubbard v. … Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 13 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2848 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983).

Tom Blake v. Davis

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 12, 2023

v. … (quoting Lantzy v. Centex Homes, 31 Cal. 4th 363, 370 (2003)). Relatedly, tolling generally occurs for the period when an inmate pursues mandatory exhaustion of administrative remedies. See Brown v.

Jennifer M. Burright v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 23, 2020

Benton, 331 4 F.3d at 1040; Brown-Hunter v. … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495; Bunnell, 336 F.3d at 19 1115-16.

Hanoi Barbaro Acosta v. C. Lepe, Warden, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 17, 2026

See Witkin v. Arnold, 757 F. … Brown, 59 F.3d 8 | 102, 104-05 (9th Cir. 1995) (loss of good time credits is not “punishment” for 3 || purposes of double jeopardy because it serves remedial goals, and even if it were 10 || punitive, it

Rose v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

396 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 27, 2005

Bank of San Jose v. … For in *1123 stance, in Abel v.

United States v. Robert P. Hess

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 13, 2021

) Petitioner, ) NOTICE OF HEARING AND 15 ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. … Brown Federal Building. 24 3420 Twelfth Street, Courtroom 1, Riverside, CA on the 1st day of November, 25

Sullivan Equity Partners, LLC v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Sep 15, 2023

The Board of Public Works (“Board”) upheld this decision on appeal. Id. §{ 104. … Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976). Here, plaintiff first presented testimony and evidence, including regarding allegations of bias, at public hearings before the Board and the Bureau.

Cynthia Lynn Ford v. Carnival Corporation

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 9, 2021

“‘[T]he owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are 23 on board . . . the duty of exercising reasonable care under the circumstances of each 24 case.’” Id. (quoting Kermarec v. … See Wallis v.

Bertha Elizarraras v. Nancy A. Berryhill

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 29, 2020

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 21 2015) (as amended); Parra v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (citation omitted). 17 B.

Sheikh v. United States Department of Homeland Security

685 F. Supp. 2d 1076 · District Court, C.D. California · Dec 15, 2009

For example, in Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir.2002), the Ninth Circuit applied section 701(a)(2) to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) refusal to reopen sua sponte a deportation proceeding. Id. at 1156 . … Petitioners appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

Leticia S. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 30, 2026

Burrell v. … (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d, 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)).