Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,916 results
2.17s
Jane S. Orcutt v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2024
If only a 12 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 13 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 14 markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 17 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 18 without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Mar 12, 2026
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 19 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 20 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material 2 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 3 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 4
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Apr 1, 2026
Except as otherwise provided in 27 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material that 28 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 1 material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 19 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 20 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownEstate of Alicia Upton v. County of Riverside
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 15, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 3 … If only a portion or portions of 13 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 14 identify the
Cited 0 timesUnknownLorrie Herman v. Hillstone Restaurant Group, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 2 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 12 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 14
Cited 0 timesUnknownSunset Junior, LLC v. AMCO Insurance Company
District Court, C.D. California · May 9, 2023
Except as otherwise provided in 2 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 3 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 4 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 11 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 12 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknown501 F. Supp. 403 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 31, 1980
In other words, a claim is insubstantial if “its unsoundness so clearly results from the previous decisions of this court as to foreclose the subject and leave no room for the inference that the questions sought to be raised … FEE AWARD Once entitlement to fees is established, the Ninth Circuit, recognizing the difficulty of weighing factors relevant to the determination of reasonable fees, grants district courts wide discretion in setting attorneys
Cited 41 timesPublishedLao v. Wickes Furniture Co., Inc.
455 F. Supp. 2d 1045 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 4, 2006
Never, for example, have I seen floor statements of Canadian MP’s cited concerning the meaning of a United States statute; only statements by Members of Congress qualify. … Next, subsection (d)(4), in language that clearly contrasts with the discretional language of subsection (d)(3), emphatically commands that a “district court shall decline to exercise jurisdiction under paragraph (2)” (emphasis
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · May 31, 2024
a deliberate indifference claim. 6 Plaintiff objects that Defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity because 7 Plaintiff had a right to decide his own medical care. … As stated previously, Plaintiff established only that he had a difference of 22 opinion with his doctor, which does not create a triable issue for a deliberate 23 indifference claim. (Dkt.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTommy R. Mercurio v. Estate of Christopher Mercurio, et al.
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 6, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a 14 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 15 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material on a 26 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 27 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHealthcare Ally Management of California LLC v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 11, 2024
If only a 18 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 19 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 20 in the margins). … If only a 2 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 3 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 4 in the margins).
Cited 0 timesUnknownA&A Global Imports, LLC v. Lerman Container Corp.
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 9, 2025
If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 19 20 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion … If only a portion of the material on a page 9 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 10 protected portion
Cited 0 timesUnknownR.S. By & Through His Guardian Ad Litem v. Berryhill
357 F. Supp. 3d 1033 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 24, 2019
Administrative Evaluation of Childhood Disability Claims To qualify for childhood disability benefits an "individual under the age of 18" *1036 ( i.e. , "child" or "claimant") must establish that he has "a medically determinable … The ALJ further observed that "[d]uring the evaluation, the [plaintiff] was talkative and clearly expressed his thoughts and ideas." (AR 30) (citing Exhibit 15F at 8 [AR 534] ).
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. California · Jun 20, 2025
Designations 14 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an 15 improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development 16 process or to impose … This provision is not intended 15 to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that 16 provides for production without prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHunter Kerhart v. United Best Sheet Metal, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · May 21, 2025
If only a portion or portions 7 of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must 8 clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 9 margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 26 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without 27 prior privilege review.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTopalsson GmbH v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
District Court, C.D. California · Mar 15, 2024
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 7 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 8 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 24 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and
Cited 0 timesUnknownJane Doe v. Dhanuba Hospitality, Inc.; Pravin R. Ahir; Sureshbhai R. Ahir
District Court, C.D. California · Sep 2, 2026
If only a portion of the material on a page 6 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 7 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 8 A Party … If only a portion of the material on 18 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 19 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 20 (b)
Cited 0 timesUnknownPatricia A. Krage v. City of Lakewood
District Court, C.D. California · Oct 19, 2021
Defendants’ motions based on prosecutorial and qualified 24 immunity are DENIED, without prejudice; 25 3. … State the facts clearly, in your own words, and without citing legal authority or argument.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, C.D. California · Oct 20, 2025
If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 2 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 12 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13
Cited 0 timesUnknownMelisha Iereneo-Blount v. Amazon.Com Inc.
District Court, C.D. California · Feb 15, 2023
If only a portion or portions of the material on 13 a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 14 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a 24 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 25 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 26 markings
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna