Case law

Abdirahman Aden Kariye, et al. v. Markwayne Mullin, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, et al.

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 31, 2026

If only a 12 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins). … This provision is not intended to modify whatever 7 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 8 without prior privilege review.

Mina Boules v. United States of America; Federal Protective Service

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 19, 2024

Except as otherwise provided in 4 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 5 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the 6 material … If only a 12 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 14 in the margins).

Daniel Rodas v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company

District Court, C.D. California · May 27, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 13 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 14 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 25 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins

INI, LLC v. MMAD Games, LLC and Imagination Gaming Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Nov 17, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 8 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 9 … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 24 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 25 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 26 margins

Gene Pool Technologies, Inc. v. Coastal Harvest, LLC

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 7, 2022

Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., 3 Section 6.3 below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that 4 qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly … If only a 12 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 14

Peloza v. Capistrano Unified School District

782 F. Supp. 1412 · District Court, C.D. California · Jan 16, 1992

The defendants further claim that the framework notes that the question of “creation science” was “thoroughly studied by leading scientific societies, and rejected as not qualifying as a scientific explanation.” … “It is clearly established in the case law, and perhaps also in common sense, that evolution is not a religion and that teaching evolution does not violate the Establishment clause.” McLean v.

Angela Heard v. Torrance Memorial Medical Center

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 13, 2023

Torrance argues that it qualifies 2 Case 2:22-cv-09466-DSF-JPR Document 25 Filed 03/13/23 Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:469 as a “person” under the … implementation of its federal duties that the private person faces a significant risk of state-court ‘prejudice, just as a government employee would in similar circumstances, and may have difficulty in raising an immunity

Kimberly Marroquin v. Unidentified LAPD Officer

District Court, C.D. California · Feb 1, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the 12 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 14 … This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure 9 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior 10 privilege review.

John Doe v. Saige Star Rowley

District Court, C.D. California · Oct 22, 2025

Except as otherwise provided in 7 || this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material 8 |/ that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 25 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 26 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins)

Dota v. United States

368 F. Supp. 3d 1354 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 30, 2018

Thus, Petitioner has established cause. He has also established prejudice. … Because Petitioner has established both cause and actual prejudice, his procedural default is excused. Petitioner has also established actual innocence.

Edwards v. First American Corp.

251 F.R.D. 454 · District Court, C.D. California · Jun 6, 2008

Rule 23 establishes two sets of requirements for class certification. First, every proposed class action must satisfy the four prerequisites of Rule 23(a). … Las Vegas Sands, Inc., 244 F.3d 1152 , 1162 (9th Cir.2001) (“The record indicates clearly that [the class representative] understands his duties and is currently willing and able to perform them.”).

Seth Gordon v. Create Music Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Jan 4, 2022

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 21 || qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 22 || portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 4 || protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 5 || (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins)

Lewis v. Ollison

571 F. Supp. 2d 1162 · District Court, C.D. California · Jul 14, 2008

1983, a plaintiff must allege that: (1) the defendants were acting under color of state law at the time the complained of acts were committed; and (2) the defendants’ conduct deprived plaintiff of rights, privileges, or immunities … Clearly, therefore, there is no question that Plaintiff is incorrect in asserting that Defendants’ policy “discontinued” the use of prayer oil.

Robert Lee Manning, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California · Jun 14, 2022

s claims against the State and state agencies unless the State has waived its immunity or Congress has overridden that immunity. … Amendment immunity,” Kentucky v.

Isaac Davidson-Gesser, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals v. Abquor Technologies, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company; Aequor Healthcare Services, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company; and Does 1-10, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Jul 6, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 14 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 15 … This provision is not intended to modify 7 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 8

Montoya Anthony Jr. Jones v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Officer Michael A. Newsom, Officer Nathan G. Soliven, Sergeant Geraldine Brawner

District Court, C.D. California · Mar 12, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 19 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 20 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of the material 2 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 3 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 4

Lorrie Herman v. Hillstone Restaurant Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California · Aug 28, 2025

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 1 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 2 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). … If only a portion or portions of 12 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 13 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 14

Sunset Junior, LLC v. AMCO Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California · May 9, 2023

Except as otherwise provided in 2 this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure of Discovery Material 3 that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before 4 the material … If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 11 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 12 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Giovanni Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles, Joe Lumbreras, Blanca Lopez, Augustin Lopez, Jerome Michalezak, N. Magpoc, M. Depasquale, Officer Reynolds, B. Bert, and Unidentified Employees of the

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 27, 2026

If only a 10 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party 11 also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 12 in the margins … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 22 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 23 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

Anna Anka and David Johansson v. LFK Engineering, a general partnership dba AuXX-Lift, Christoph Klooth, Lutz Friedrich Klooth, and Does 1 through 3, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California · Apr 22, 2026

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 7 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 8 the … If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 23 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify 24 the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the 25 margins